pompeii

Censer no. 2 in situ in the domestic shrine at Boscoreale. (Credit: Eber, Johannes et al. “Ashes from Pompeii: Incense Burners, Residue Analyses and Domestic Cult Practices.” Antiquity (2026): 1–20. Web. / Pompeii, Archivio Fotografico inv. H6803)

In A Nutshell

  • Scientists chemically analyzed ash from two ancient incense burners found in and near Pompeii, identifying for the first time what Romans actually burned at their home altars.
  • Residues included woody plants such as laurel and stone fruit varieties, likely used as both fuel and ritual offerings.
  • One censer contained traces of an exotic imported resin, probably elemi from sub-Saharan Africa or tropical Asia, marking the first archaeological evidence of imported incense in Pompeii’s domestic cult.
  • Possible wine traces were also detected, consistent with a well-documented Roman pre-sacrifice ritual combining wine and incense.

Roman worship wasn’t confined to temples. In homes across the empire, nearly every family kept a small shrine where daily offerings were made to protective household gods. Incense was central to those rituals, mentioned repeatedly in Roman poetry and literature for centuries. But until now, no direct chemical evidence had confirmed what was actually burning inside those little clay vessels. Chemical analysis of residues from two incense burners found near Pompeii has finally answered that question, and part of the answer came from thousands of miles away.

Researchers examined the burnt remains inside two terracotta censers, small fireproof vessels designed for burning fragrant offerings, recovered from domestic sites in and around Pompeii. One turned up in a building being converted into an inn when Mount Vesuvius buried the city in AD 79. The other was discovered exactly where it had been left, inside a fully furnished household shrine at a country villa in Boscoreale, a town just outside the city. Both had been sitting in Italian archives for decades, their blackened interiors unanalyzed.

Using microscopes and chemical analysis, a team from institutions in Switzerland, Germany and Ireland identified woody plants, exotic resin and traces of what may have been wine among the substances burned. Published in the journal Antiquity, their results offer the first archaeological confirmation of imported incense in Pompeii’s domestic cult, giving physical form to what ancient texts and wall paintings had only described.

How Romans Used Incense at Home

Household religion sat at the center of daily Roman life. Most families kept a shrine called a lararium, dedicated to protective spirits including the Lares, guardians of the home and land, and the Penates, protectors of the pantry. About 570 such shrines have been identified in Pompeii alone. Roman writers and poets describe offerings of incense, wine, fruit and grain as routine acts of piety, carried out on birthdays, festivals and ordinary days alike. For all that documentation, no one had actually tested the ash itself.

Both censers held evidence of burned woody plants, most likely including laurel and stone fruit varieties related to mulberry, cherry or plum, used as fuel or as deliberate plant offerings. Oak also appears among the tentative plant identifications, and Roman texts cited in the paper note it was sacred to Jupiter, while laurel was burned in honor of Apollo, so even the choice of firewood carried its own religious meaning.

pompeii
Censer no. 2 (PAP inv. 40196) (photograph by J. Eber). (Credit: Eber, Johannes et al. “Ashes from Pompeii: Incense Burners, Residue Analyses and Domestic Cult Practices.” Antiquity (2026): 1–20. Web.

First Physical Proof of Pompeii Incense Offerings Confirmed

More revealing was what turned up in the second censer, the one from the Boscoreale villa shrine. Analysis identified the chemical fingerprints of a Burseraceae resin, a plant family that includes frankincense and myrrh. Specific compounds are consistent with elemi, a fragrant resin from the Canarium tree, which grows across tropical and subtropical regions of sub-Saharan Africa and Asia, including India. Notably, chemical analysis of the first censer found no preserved resin or organic markers at all, meaning every trace of aromatic and possible wine residue comes exclusively from the Boscoreale vessel.

Ancient graffiti and inscriptions from Pompeii had mentioned incense purchases. One shopping list from a food stall recorded the price of incense alongside oil, cheese and dates. A funerary inscription noted that 10 kilograms of frankincense were burned at a magistrate’s burial. But those were words scratched in stone. No one had ever pulled the physical evidence of exotic incense directly from a Pompeian censer. This analysis did, providing direct archaeological evidence of imported aromatic resin in the city’s domestic cult.

Getting elemi to a household shrine in Pompeii required a supply chain spanning continents. Aromatic resins from East Africa and South Asia moved northward across the Red Sea from at least the first century BC, eventually reaching Italian ports before traveling inland. An ivory statuette of the Indian goddess Lakshmi found in a Pompeian home had long suggested the city’s reach into distant trade networks, and ancient records confirm incense merchants working at those same Italian ports. Chemical traces in an altar bowl now make that connection physical.

Wine and Incense: Inside Pompeii’s Altar Rituals

Analysis of the Boscoreale censer also turned up markers consistent with a grape-derived product, possibly wine. Roman religious practice included a preliminary offering called the praefatio, combining wine and incense before a sacrifice, and wall paintings in Pompeii depict exactly this ritual. The grape markers here could represent one of the first physical traces of that practice. Researchers caution, though, that because the censer wasn’t excavated under modern conditions and no surrounding soil samples survived, some contamination can’t be ruled out. Resin evidence stands on considerably stronger ground.

Three small female figurines on the rim of the Boscoreale censer tell another part of the story. Two busts flank a reclining woman, figures the authors suggest likely represent deceased individuals venerated by their families. With incense residue and possible wine traces confirmed inside, the vessel fits squarely into early Roman funerary customs, where both were routine offerings to the dead.

Most Roman homes had an altar, and Roman families fed it regularly with fire, plants and fragrant smoke. Now, the chemistry of those offerings can be read directly from the ash, confirming that the private spiritual lives of Pompeii’s residents were connected to trade routes stretching from Italy to the rainforests of India and the savannas of Africa.


Paper Notes

Limitations

Both censers were recovered during 20th-century excavations, one in 1954 and one in 1986, rather than under modern controlled conditions. No soil or sediment control samples from the surrounding deposits were preserved, meaning that post-depositional contamination of the organic residues cannot be fully excluded. The sparsely documented post-excavation histories of both objects add another layer of interpretive caution. Plant identification from phytolith assemblages is described by the authors as indicative rather than definitive, reflecting standard capture biases and taphonomic filtering inherent to the method. Only two censers were analyzed, which limits broader conclusions about the full range of Pompeian domestic cult practices.

Funding and Disclosures

This study was co-funded by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (ERC-2015-StG 678901-Food-Transforms), as part of Philipp Wolfgang Stockhammer’s ERC Starting Grant project, FoodTransforms. Johannes Eber’s research was supported by the Distant Worlds Munich Graduate School for Ancient Studies (GSC 1039). Robert C. Power’s research was funded by Research Ireland (32/PATH-A/9284). Analyses were authorized by the Parco Archeologico di Pompei. No conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Publication Details

The paper, “Ashes from Pompeii: incense burners, residue analyses and domestic cult practices,” was authored by Johannes Eber (University of Zurich), Shira Gur-Arieh (Christian Albrecht University of Kiel), Robert C. Power (University College Dublin), Maxime Rageot (University of Bonn) and Philipp Wolfgang Stockhammer (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich and Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology). It was published in 2026 in the journal Antiquity by Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2026.10320

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment