
(Credit: Andrew Neel from Pexels)
In A Nutshell
- A large genetic study found significant overlap between certain psychiatric conditions and 73 physical diseases, covering roughly 1.9 million case records.
- ADHD, PTSD, and major depression showed the strongest genetic overlap with physical diseases, in some analyses surpassing the average overlap seen among physical diseases themselves.
- Researchers identified a single shared genetic signal spanning 21 physical disorders across six medical categories, validated in an independent sample of nearly 30,000 patients.
- Genetic correlation reflects shared risk, not cause and effect: the biological mechanisms behind these connections remain to be determined.
Mental illness and physical illness have long been handled as separate problems. One is handled by psychiatrists, the other by the rest of medicine. A sweeping new genetic study, published in Nature Communications, finds that divide is far thinner than medicine has assumed, and for millions of people living with both depression and diabetes, or ADHD and chronic pain, science may finally be closer to explaining what their daily experience already tells them.
Researchers at the University of Colorado Boulder and collaborating institutions analyzed genetic data tied to 73 physical diseases and 13 psychiatric disorders, covering roughly 1.9 million case records of physical illness. Conditions like ADHD, PTSD, and major depression share significant genetic overlap with diseases of the heart, lungs, gut, and beyond. In some comparisons, the average genetic overlap between certain psychiatric conditions and physical diseases appeared higher than the overlap seen among many physical diseases themselves.
If the same genetic wiring is quietly fueling both a person’s depression and their chronic lung disease, treating these conditions in isolation could mean missing a much bigger picture, one where prevention strategies might eventually target shared risk pathways rather than chasing individual diagnoses one at a time.
Uncovering the Genetic Link Between Mental and Physical Illness
Lead author Jeremy M. Lawrence and his team at the University of Colorado Boulder’s Institute for Behavioral Genetics used a statistical method that pulls together publicly available results from large genetic studies, even when those studies drew from completely different groups of participants. They also introduced a new analytical tool designed to identify hidden patterns of genetic overlap across many traits without having to decide ahead of time how those relationships should be organized.
Physical diseases spanned eight broad categories: neurological, respiratory, circulatory, digestive, hormonal and metabolic, genitourinary, musculoskeletal, and cancer. On the psychiatric side, researchers worked with five established groupings based on shared genetic signals, with some conditions appearing in more than one group: compulsive disorders (including anorexia nervosa, OCD, and Tourette’s syndrome), psychotic and thought disorders (bipolar disorder and schizophrenia), neurodevelopmental conditions (ADHD, autism, PTSD, major depression, and Tourette’s syndrome), internalizing disorders (PTSD, major depression, and anxiety), and substance use disorders (alcohol, cannabis, and opioids).
Why ADHD, PTSD, and Depression Show the Strongest Genetic Link to Physical Disease
Not all psychiatric categories showed the same pattern. Compulsive disorders had almost no meaningful genetic overlap with physical diseases, with one notable exception: a negative genetic relationship with a cluster of digestive conditions including acute pancreatitis, appendicitis, gallstones, and peptic ulcers, meaning those genetic patterns were associated with lower risk of those conditions. Psychotic and thought disorders showed modest connections with digestive, musculoskeletal, and respiratory conditions, with bipolar disorder driving most of that signal rather than schizophrenia.
Neurodevelopmental, internalizing, and substance use disorders told a very different story. All three showed large genetic correlations with physical disease factors across every one of the eight medical categories. ADHD, PTSD, and major depression stood out as the strongest individual drivers, with their average genetic correlation to the full range of physical diseases, in some analyses, even exceeding the average genetic overlap seen among physical diseases themselves. Substance use disorders stood apart for a different reason: the shared genetic signal across alcohol, cannabis, and opioid disorders appeared broadly and uniformly tied to physical disease risk, rather than being driven by any one substance.
Mapping a Single Shared Genetic Signal Across Dozens of Physical Diseases
Researchers then asked whether a single, broad shared genetic signal might cut across all 73 physical conditions. A data-driven analysis identified a common factor spanning 21 disorders across six of the eight medical categories, with 27 distinct regions of the genome linked to that broad physical disease risk.
To test whether those findings held up in the real world, the team analyzed data from the Penn Medicine BioBank, a hospital-based collection of approximately 29,883 participants. Genetic scores for the common physical disease factor were linked to a wide range of conditions in that independent sample, including chronic airway obstruction, type 2 diabetes, obesity, high blood pressure, heart disease, sleep apnea, and acid reflux disease.
When that 21-disorder physical factor was modeled alongside the five psychiatric groupings, it showed large genetic correlations with the substance use, internalizing, and neurodevelopmental factors, with values of 0.63, 0.61, and 0.68 respectively. In genetics research, those are large numbers.
Worth noting: genetic correlation alone does not reveal the direction of cause and effect. One possibility is that psychiatric conditions, or the behaviors tied to them, directly raise the risk of physical disease through a cascading chain. Another is that some upstream biological or behavioral process, perhaps genetically influenced personality traits or patterns like physical inactivity, independently elevates the risk of both at once.
“These findings suggest a need for an additional classification system, conceptualizing illnesses as outcomes from systems of interconnected risk, likely unrelated to particular phenotypic presentations,” the authors wrote. Such a framework would point toward shared causes that could inform prevention strategies targeting underlying risk rather than its many downstream consequences.
For millions of people managing both a psychiatric diagnosis and a chronic physical condition, these findings suggest that these conditions may not be as separate as they’ve long appeared to be. They could share deeper biological roots.
Disclaimer: This article is based on an observational genetic study. Findings reflect shared genetic associations across large datasets and do not establish cause and effect between psychiatric and physical conditions. Results were derived primarily from individuals of European ancestry and may not generalize to all populations. Readers should consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any decisions about their health or treatment.
Paper Notes
Limitations
Genetic data in this study were restricted to individuals of European ancestry, which limits how broadly the findings apply to other populations. Analyses captured risk sharing through common genetic variants only (those with a minor allele frequency above 1%), meaning rarer genetic differences were not included. Genetic scores for the 21-disorder common physical factor did not significantly predict psychiatric disorders in the Penn Medicine BioBank, though researchers attribute that gap to a smaller number of psychiatric cases available in that sample rather than a true absence of association. As with any exploratory analysis, the Genomic E-SEM method relies on investigator judgment for determining the number of factors and factor loading cutoffs, which underscores the need for future replication.
Funding and Disclosures
Jeremy M. Lawrence was supported by NIMH Grant T32MH016880. Andrew D. Grotzinger and Lukas S. Schaffer were supported by NIH Grant R01MH120219. Grotzinger and Isabelle F. Foote were supported by NIA Grant R01AG073593. Travis T. Mallard was supported by NIH Grant K08MH135343. Sophie Breunig was supported by the Shurl and Kay Curci Foundation. Penn Medicine BioBank support was provided by the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, the Smilow family, and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences under CTSA award UL1TR001878. Scott M. Damrauer discloses research support from RenalytixAI and in-kind research support from Novo Nordisk, both outside the scope of this study. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Publication Details
Title: Shared Genetic Liability across Systems of Psychiatric and Physical Illness | Authors: Jeremy M. Lawrence, Isabelle F. Foote, Sophie Breunig, Lukas S. Schaffer, Siraj Lyons, Sarah A. Abramowitz, Michael G. Levin, Scott M. Damrauer, Penn Medicine BioBank, Travis T. Mallard, and Andrew D. Grotzinger | Journal: Nature Communications (2026), 17:2993 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69218-1 | Lead author affiliation: Institute for Behavioral Genetics and Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder. Additional affiliations include the University of Louisville, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School. | Corresponding author: [email protected] | Pre-registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YBA58







