astronautgut

A new study from the University of Copenhagen in collaboration with NASA provides an idea of what happens in the stomach without the influence of gravity. (Credit: Frans Wej/Jean Beaufort/Elionas2)

Space Travel Slows Astronauts’ Digestion, and Their Gut Bacteria Are Adapting to It

In A Nutshell

  • A study of 52 astronauts found that gut bacteria appear to shift from digesting fiber to digesting protein during spaceflight, likely due to slower intestinal transit in microgravity.
  • The shift produces byproducts that return to normal within days of landing but have been linked in other research to cell aging, altered brain activity, and kidney disease risk.
  • Diet explained only about 27.5 percent of the metabolic changes seen, with caffeine and fish intake dropping during missions.
  • Researchers suggest adding more fiber to astronaut diets could help ease the problem on future long-duration missions.

Constipation is a well-documented problem among astronauts. Now, a new study points to a likely explanation. The bacteria in their gut appear to start feeding on protein instead of fiber once astronauts leave Earth’s gravity. A study tracking 52 astronauts before, during, and after stays on the International Space Station identified this shift as one of the clearest metabolic patterns in the astronauts’ blood, and the team suggests that adding more fiber to space diets could help address it.

Published in Nature Communications, the study analyzed blood samples from astronauts who flew missions lasting between two and nine months aboard the ISS between 2006 and 2018. Researchers used a highly sensitive chemical analysis technique to scan for hundreds of compounds circulating in the bloodstream, ultimately zeroing in on about 40 that changed during spaceflight. Several of the clearest changes pointed to altered activity by gut bacteria, particularly an increase in protein fermentation.

Slower Digestion in Orbit Pushes Gut Bacteria Toward Protein

Bacteria in the large intestine normally feed on fiber and carbohydrates, but when digestion slows, those preferred fuel sources can run out. The microbes may then switch to breaking down protein instead, a process that generates a different set of chemical byproducts, several of which researchers detected at elevated levels in astronauts’ blood during flight. When the astronauts returned to Earth, those levels came back down within days.

Some of those compounds carry baggage. One has been linked in recent research to accelerating cell aging. Others have been associated in animal studies with changes in brain activity and anxiety-like behavior. In people with compromised kidney function, elevated levels of these compounds are tied to increased disease risk. Whether those same risks apply to otherwise healthy astronauts on missions is not yet established, though researchers consider the pattern worth taking seriously.

One additional marker that rose during flight, a compound called pimelic acid, has also been linked in human studies to slower movement of food through the gut. Its appearance in the data reinforces the broader picture researchers are drawing.

space constipation infographic
Astronaut blood samples reveal a gut bacteria shift during spaceflight that may explain a long-standing bathroom problem in orbit. (Image by StudyFinds)

Blood Chemistry Shifted Within Days of Launch and Reversed After Landing

Using blood samples collected at multiple time points, the research team tracked the metabolic arc of spaceflight in unusual detail. In total, 488 plasma samples were collected from 11 female and 41 male astronauts, with an average age of 48. Changes appeared shortly after launch, held roughly steady during the mission itself, then reversed within days of landing.

Previous spaceflight metabolism studies had largely relied on comparing samples only before and after flight, or had focused on just one or two subjects. This study’s size and its repeated sampling allowed the team to track which metabolic changes appeared during spaceflight and how they shifted after the astronauts returned to Earth. A statistical model built from the data correctly identified blood samples taken during spaceflight with an error rate of just 2.6%. Samples taken on Earth before launch were harder to classify by comparison, coming in at a 7.1% error rate, which researchers say may reflect the wider variety of diets and routines available on the ground.

Diet Explained Only 27.5 Percent of the Changes Seen

Not every metabolic change traced back to gut bacteria. About 27.5% of the changing features appeared to be related to what astronauts were eating, or not eating, during their missions. Caffeine-related compounds dropped during flight, which researchers suggest may reflect astronauts drinking less coffee or switching to instant coffee, which contains less caffeine than brewed. Markers tied to fish intake also declined, along with compounds typically associated with eating fatty fish or fish oils.

Researchers found no major sex-specific differences in how male and female astronauts’ metabolism responded to spaceflight, with one exception: the flight-related change in the fish intake marker was observed only in the female astronauts.

Despite established ISS dietary guidelines that include fish and seafood, the data suggest actual intake patterns shift in practice during missions. Prior NASA research had encouraged fish consumption partly for its potential protective effect against bone loss in space.

Researchers Say More Fiber in Space Diets Could Ease the Problem

Researchers propose that increasing the availability of slowly fermented carbohydrates, meaning dietary fiber, aboard the ISS could help reduce protein fermentation and support gut health during spaceflight. As the authors put it, “Increasing the consumption of slow-fermented carbohydrates at ISS to reduce protein fermentation might improve gastrointestinal health in astronauts in future human long-term spaceflights.”

Proving that microgravity itself causes this shift, rather than some other feature of life in orbit, will take further research, since this study could not isolate microgravity from every other aspect of spaceflight. Still, as space agencies plan future long-duration missions, gut health may deserve the same careful planning as the engineering challenges of getting there.


Paper Notes

Limitations

Several limitations apply to this research. Blood samples were collected under varying conditions across different protocols and years, and some storage differences, specifically whether plasma had been separated from the collection tube before freezing, had to be statistically accounted for. The study was observational in design, meaning researchers could identify associations and patterns but cannot prove that microgravity directly causes the gut changes observed. Diet during flight was not controlled or directly measured in this analysis; dietary influences were inferred from blood markers rather than from dietary records. The raw data cannot be publicly shared due to privacy laws, and access requires a formal request through NASA’s data archive.

Funding and Disclosures

This work was supported by the Novo Nordisk Foundation (PRIMA; grant no. NNF19OC0056246). Original sample collection studies were funded by the Human Health Countermeasures Element of the NASA Human Research Program. The authors declare no competing interests.

Publication Details

Paper title: Longitudinal metabolomics profiles reveal increased gut microbial protein fermentation during Spaceflight | Authors: Giorgia La Barbera, Jan Stanstrup, Sara R. Zwart, Scott M. Smith, Henrik M. Roager, and Lars Ove Dragsted | Affiliations: Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen (La Barbera, Stanstrup, Roager, Dragsted); Health and Human Performance, University of Houston (Zwart); Human Health and Performance Directorate, NASA Johnson Space Center (Smith) | Journal: Nature Communications, volume 17, article number 8384 (2026) | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-74979-w

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor