Pregnant woman with fetus

(Credit: Alexa Mat/Shutterstock)

In a Nutshell

  • For the first time globally, women now have higher fertility rates than men, a crossover that occurred in 2024 and is driven by a growing surplus of men at childbearing ages worldwide.
  • Declining death rates and narrowing gaps in male-female mortality have left more men alive during their reproductive years, spreading births across a larger male population and pulling the male fertility rate down.
  • The trend is expected to widen through at least 2100, raising concerns about male childlessness, marriage market imbalances, and the long-term social consequences of surplus male populations, particularly in East Asia.

For most of recorded history, men have had higher fertility rates than women. That might sound impossible, since it takes one of each to make a baby. But the math behind fertility rates depends on dividing the number of births by the number of people of childbearing age in each sex. When one sex has fewer people in that age range, their rate goes up. For centuries, wars, higher male mortality, and the fact that men tend to die younger meant there were simply fewer men around, which pushed their fertility rate above women’s.

In 2024, that long-standing pattern quietly reversed. A study by researchers at the Max-Planck Institute for Demographic Research found that women now have higher fertility rates than men on a global scale, for the first time. And this is not a move toward equality between the sexes. It’s a growing gap heading in the opposite direction, driven by a surplus of men at childbearing ages that is pulling male fertility rates down.

Gender symbols
Women now out-reproduce men on a global scale. (© itakdalee – stock.adobe.com)

Why the Fertility Rate Gap Flipped

The study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, identifies several forces that converged to flip this pattern. Death rates have been declining around the world, and the gap between how often men and women die has been narrowing. As fewer young men die before reaching the age when they might have children, the male surplus at those ages grows. On top of that, in some countries, decades of sex-selective abortion, the practice of ending pregnancies based on the sex of the fetus, has produced generations with far more boys than girls.

These forces have created a growing surplus of men among people of childbearing age worldwide. More men competing for fewer women means the same number of births gets spread across a larger male population, dragging the male fertility rate down. Meanwhile, with fewer women in that age bracket, each birth contributes more to the female rate, pushing it higher.

The researchers used population data from the United Nations to estimate past, current, and future differences between male and female fertility rates around the world. Their analysis confirmed that the global crossover, the moment female fertility rates passed male fertility rates, happened in 2024.

Fertility rate flip infographic
(Infographic generated by StudyFInds)

Where the Gap Between Men and Women Is Widest

While the crossover is a worldwide event, it is far from even. The study finds that the gap is expected to grow most sharply in countries like China and India, where decades of sex-selective abortion have deepened population imbalances. In those nations, the difference between male and female fertility rates is projected to reach as much as 20 percent.

That number points to a deep structural imbalance, with large numbers of men facing serious barriers to partnership and parenthood. In a world where men and women existed in roughly equal numbers at childbearing ages, their fertility rates would be nearly identical, with small differences driven by things like age gaps between partners. A 20 percent gap signals a fundamental mismatch in the population.

Fertility rate gap infographic
(Infographic generated by StudyFinds)

A Problem With No Quick Fix

The study stands out not only for identifying the crossover but for showing that the trend has no signs of slowing down. The growing surplus of men at childbearing ages is expected to keep shaping fertility patterns for decades. The researchers describe this as a widening gap rather than a correction toward balance.

This matters for reasons well beyond individual family planning. Societies with large surpluses of unmarried young men have historically faced serious problems. Other researchers have linked surpluses of unmarried young men to higher rates of crime and sexually transmitted diseases, particularly in East Asian countries. The study itself sticks to the demographic picture rather than predicting specific social consequences. What the study’s authors do stress is that sex differences in fertility have been dramatically understudied. Most demographic research focuses on female fertility rates, often ignoring the male side entirely.

The surplus of men is not a problem that can be fixed quickly, even in countries that have taken steps to ban sex-selective abortion. Children born during periods of extreme imbalance are already growing up and entering their childbearing years. The demographic consequences of those imbalances are locked in for a generation.

For the billions of people living in the countries most affected by this shift, particularly across large parts of Asia, the growing gap between male and female fertility rates will shape personal lives and national policy alike. Beyond individual lives, the shift raises policy questions around elder care, social support for the childless, and the long-term stability of marriage markets, though those effects were not directly modeled in the study.

By tracing the reversal and its expected path forward, the study makes the case that male fertility, and the structural forces shaping it, deserves far more attention from researchers and policymakers than it currently receives. The historical assumption that men reproduce at higher rates than women is now officially outdated, and the reversal is only picking up speed.


Paper Notes

Limitations

The study relies on an indirect method to estimate male fertility rates, which is necessary because birth records in most countries track the mother’s information far more reliably than the father’s. This method, while well established, depends on the accuracy of underlying population data from the United Nations. Projections about future fertility differences also depend on assumptions about future death rates, migration patterns, and whether sex-selective abortion continues or stops, all of which carry built-in uncertainty. Readers should keep in mind that the further into the future these projections extend, the less certain they become.

Funding and Disclosures

Research was supported by several institutions and grants. Henrik-Alexander Schubert received funding from the Gro Harlem Brundtland Visiting Fellowship from the Centre for Fertility and Health. Schubert and Dudel were supported by grants to the Max Planck-University of Helsinki Center from the Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation, the Max Planck Society, the Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Helsinki, and the Cities of Helsinki, Vantaa, and Espoo. Skirbekk received financial support from the NIH (R01 grant no. R01AG069109-01), the Research Council of Norway (grant numbers 296297, 262700, and 288083), and the European Research Council Advanced Grant Project 101142786-HOMME. Open access funding was provided by the Max Planck Society. The authors declare no competing interests.

Publication Details

Title: Masculinization of populations reverses sex differences in fertility

Authors: Henrik-Alexander Schubert, T. Spoorenberg, Christian Dudel, V. Skirbekk

Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2533317123

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply