alien hunting

The SETI Institute's Allen Telescope Array. Credit: Photo by Isabel Gerrard; edited by Ananya Kalapatapu

Search For Alien Signals Finds Only Earthly Noise So Far

In A Nutshell

  • A pilot search found no deliberate alien signals in a narrow slice of sky.
  • Every candidate was noise or Earth-based interference.
  • Best case, a narrow Arecibo-class beam could have been caught 124 light-years away.
  • A four-year survey of far more sky is underway.

A pilot search using a radio telescope built for alien hunting found no sign of deliberate alien signals in a narrow slice of sky. The test was sensitive enough to catch a transmitter as powerful as the retired Arecibo radar, once the strongest on Earth, from more than 100 light-years away, under the best conditions.

Finding an alien message is a needle-in-a-haystack problem, with countless directions, times, and radio channels to check. A civilization hoping to be heard would likely save energy by aiming a beam at a target and sending it only occasionally, which makes the signal easy to miss unless both sides know when to tune in.

Game theory offers a shortcut. Aliens living near the flat plane that Earth orbits in could watch Earth cross the Sun’s face, the same way astronomers here spot planets crossing distant stars. The middle of that crossing is a moment both sides could work out without ever talking, what game theorists call a Schelling point, an obvious meeting place two strangers might pick independently. From Earth, the matching position is a point in the sky directly opposite the Sun. Light’s travel time would force a timing correction, most likely by the sender, a feat an advanced civilization could manage.

Scientists have discussed this idea for decades, yet large earlier radio surveys likely spent only 0.0004 percent of their time on the spot, all by accident. A team from the SETI Institute and partner universities set out to fix that with the Allen Telescope Array, a 42-dish radio observatory in Hat Creek, California, starting with a pilot test in summer 2023. The study was published in The Astronomical Journal.

Two Beams Separate Alien Signals From Earth Interference

Because that spot sits opposite the Sun, it is above the horizon only at night. Of the array’s 42 dishes, the pilot used 20, tuned to a lower band of radio frequencies than the full survey will use. That band included the frequency hydrogen gas emits, a long-proposed channel for cosmic conversation.

To tell alien signals from Earth interference, the telescope points two beams at once. One aims straight at the target spot, while a second aims a short distance away as a control. A real signal from deep space should appear strongly in the first beam and far weaker in the second. Interference from satellites and other human technology shows up in both. Signals from distant worlds should also slide slowly in frequency as Earth rotates, a shift like the changing pitch of a passing siren, while most local interference holds steady.

Antisolar Point SETI Pilot Study
Scientists listened for alien messages timed to Earth’s path across the Sun and heard only interference, for now. (Image by StudyFinds)

Three-Night Pilot Search Finds No Alien Signals

Over three nights, the telescope logged about 17 hours of observations, less than 1 percent of what the full survey will gather. Software flagged 1.9 million narrow radio blips. About 1.3 million showed up identically in both beams, a sign of Earth interference, leaving roughly 580,000 candidates.

Researchers then examined the most promising candidates by eye, more than 2,100 in all, and every one turned out to be noise or Earth-based interference. One drifting signal looked interesting at first, but its strength differed too little between beams to come from a distant source, and it sat in a band used for satellite communications.

Coming up empty still produced a measurement. Depending on how a signal was positioned and how much it drifted in frequency, the test could have spotted an Arecibo-class beam squeezed onto one narrow radio channel, out to 44 light-years in the worst case and 124 in the best. That holds only for the small slice of sky the pilot covered, roughly one twenty-fourth of the way around the full circle.

Lessons from the pilot changed the plan. The lower radio frequencies were so crowded with interference that the search software ran about ten times slower, so the full survey moves to higher frequencies, at the cost of covering less area. The full survey tackles satellite interference, with a satellite company pausing or limiting transmissions as its satellites cross the telescope’s beam, since phone-service satellites can otherwise swamp the entire band for about 15 seconds.

Sweeping the entire band of sky where such an alignment could occur should take about four years, since the array also serves other projects. By the full survey’s end, the team estimates it could catch the same kind of transmission from roughly 32 to 79 light-years away, depending on conditions, a shorter reach than the pilot’s but across far more sky. A promising signal would trigger saving that night’s recording and a recheck on later nights. More than 121 additional nights of data have already been recorded, with first-year results due in a future paper.

Three quiet nights cannot say whether anyone is out there, and the approach rests on a guess about how aliens think. Still, if an alien civilization is timing messages to Earth’s transit across the Sun, scientists are now listening in the right neighborhood at the right time.


Disclaimer: This article summarizes a single pilot study and is intended for informational purposes only. Three nights of observing cannot show that alien transmitters are absent, and conclusions may change as the full survey is completed. Readers interested in the science should consult the original paper and qualified astronomers.


Paper Notes

Limitations

Pilot data came from only three nights in summer 2023, about 0.8% of the planned survey, using 20 of the array’s dishes and a lower frequency range (1,064 to 2,378 megahertz) that the team has since replaced with 2,356 to 3,700 megahertz. It searched only a stretch of sky spanning roughly 20.266 to 21.312 hours of right ascension, and the null result applies to narrowband signals about 1 hertz wide above a flux density threshold of 115 to 936 janskys. Broader or weaker signals are not ruled out. Researchers inspected only the top-ranked candidates, 2,114 of roughly 580,000 remaining hits (the top 500 from each night plus 614 flagged by a second beam-comparison test), rather than every one. The completed survey will also cover only about 10% of the antisolar region’s width in ecliptic latitude, and the approach assumes a transmitter deliberately aimed at Earth that is positioned to watch Earth cross the Sun. The paper adds that no coherent Doppler correction for Earth’s motion was applied before processing, a step that can recover more power from drifting signals but demands heavy computing.

Funding and Disclosures

According to the acknowledgments, the Allen Telescope Array’s refurbishment and operations received substantial support from Franklin Antonio, with additional contributions from Frank Levinson, Greg Papadopoulos, the Breakthrough Listen Initiative, and other private donors. The Paul G. Allen Family Foundation provided major support for the array’s design and construction, alongside contributions from Nathan Myhrvold, Xilinx Corporation, Sun Microsystems, and other private donors. The array has also received support from the US Naval Observatory and the US National Science Foundation. One author acknowledged a National Science Foundation MPS-Ascend Postdoctoral Research Fellowship (grant No. 2138147), and another author’s participation was supported through the SETI Institute REU program funded under NSF award No. 2051007. Several authors are affiliated with the SETI Institute, which operates the array. The paper contains no separate competing-interest statement.

Publication Details

Sofia Z. Sheikh, Eleanor Hort, Bárbara Cabrales, Isabel Gerrard, Wael Farah, Nick Tusay, David R. DeBoer, Saul Balcarcel-Salazar, Joe S. Bright, Luigi F. Cruz, Ben Jacobson-Bell, Mark Masters, Alexander W. Pollak, Seth Shostak, Carol Shumaker, and Andrew Siemion wrote “A Large-scale Technosignature Survey of the Antisolar Point with the Allen Telescope Array: Survey Design and Pilot Results.” Sheikh, the first-listed author, is affiliated with the SETI Institute and the Berkeley SETI Research Center, and other authors come from universities in the US, UK, and Malta. It appeared in The Astronomical Journal, Volume 172, Article 288 (December 2026), after being received November 6, 2025, revised September 3, 2026, accepted September 9, 2026, and published November 3, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aeaa59. The article is open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license and published by the American Astronomical Society.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor