Closed,Up,Of,Crocodile,Legs,And,Tail.the,Crocodile’s,Hind,Legs

Credit: Hary Purwanto on Shutterstock

Newly-Named Prehistoric Reptile Roamed Ancient Arizona 215 Million Years Ago

In A Nutshell

  • Scientists discovered a new Triassic reptile in Arizona called Sonselasuchus cedrus, a strange crocodile relative that looked surprisingly like an ostrich.
  • The fossils come from Petrified Forest National Park and include more than 950 bones from at least 36 individuals.
  • The animal had toothless jaws that likely supported a beak-like covering.
  • Its limb bones suggest younger animals may have relied more on four legs before becoming more hind-limb-dominant as they grew.

A creature that looked like an ostrich and walked upright on two legs but was actually a close relative of crocodiles just got a name: Sonselasuchus cedrus. Found at Petrified Forest National Park in Arizona, this 215-million-year-old animal is shaking up what scientists know about one of the strangest groups of reptiles that ever lived. Even more surprising, its bones suggest younger animals may have relied more on all four legs before becoming more hind-limb-dominant as they grew.

Paleontologists Elliott Armour Smith and Christian A. Sidor of the University of Washington’s Department of Biology and Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture described the new species in the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. Their work draws on more than 950 fossil bones representing at least 36 individuals, the largest collection of its kind from any single site in the world. The animal belonged to a group called shuvosaurids, ancient relatives of crocodiles that independently evolved a body shape eerily similar to the ornithomimids, the famous “ostrich mimic” dinosaurs of the Late Cretaceous. Like those dinosaurs, shuvosaurids were toothless, had large eye sockets, and walked upright. But they weren’t dinosaurs at all.

A Massive Fossil Haul From Ancient Arizona

The fossils come from a single dig site called the Kaye Quarry, located within the rock layers of Petrified Forest National Park. The site preserves a chaotic jumble of nearly all separated bones, meaning the skeletons had been broken apart before burial, from multiple species of ancient animals. Shuvosaurid bones make up roughly 33% of everything recovered from the quarry, an extraordinary concentration.

Dating methods place the site at approximately 215 million years old, during the Late Triassic period, when the supercontinent Pangaea was still largely intact and Arizona looked nothing like it does today. The surrounding rock layers record a period of increasing dryness, with the region shifting from wetter conditions to a more arid environment. The fossils were found in sediments that scientists believe were deposited when a river channel overflowed its banks onto a nearby floodplain, which helps explain why the bones are so thoroughly scattered yet well preserved.

Sharing this ancient ecosystem with Sonselasuchus were large amphibians, early dinosaurs, and a variety of other reptiles, including the armored aquatic reptile Vancleavea campi and early relatives of pterosaurs. The diversity of animals preserved at this single site paints a vivid picture of a busy ecosystem in the deep past.

Sonselasuchus
Artist’s reconstruction of Sonselasuchus cedrus in its environment in what is now Petrified Forest National Park, 215 million years ago. (Credit: Artwork by Gabriel Ugueto)

What Made This Toothless Reptile Unique

Smith and Sidor identified the new species primarily from features of the upper jaw. The main bone of the upper jaw behind the nostril had a reduced and extremely thin front portion, creating a deeply scooped-out rear margin of the nostril opening. An enlarged opening between the nostril and the jaw was bigger than in its relatives. The back end of the upper jaw bone was flattened and paddle-shaped, a feature unlike anything seen in other members of the group.

Like its relatives, Sonselasuchus was completely toothless. Instead of teeth, the edges of its jaws formed sharp cutting ridges, similar to the beak-like structures found in turtles and some dinosaurs. Dense clusters of tiny holes on the jaw surfaces, traces of blood vessels and nerves, suggest the living animal had a horn-like covering over its jaws, much like a bird’s beak. This beak may have been used for eating soft vegetation, consistent with earlier ideas that shuvosaurids may have fed on soft vegetation.

Beyond the skull, much of the rest of the skeleton was broadly similar to what has been described for other shuvosaurids, though subtle differences appeared throughout. The researchers described bones from nearly every region of the body, from the neck down to the toe claws, providing the most detailed look at shuvosaurid anatomy from any single species.

How Sonselasuchus May Have Learned to Walk on Two Legs

One of the most interesting parts of the study is the analysis of how body proportions changed as Sonselasuchus grew. With thigh bones ranging from 7.5 to 17.8 centimeters in length across dozens of individuals, the researchers had an unusually large sample to work with. Most of the individuals appear to have been skeletally immature, meaning they hadn’t finished growing.

By comparing the dimensions of front-leg bones to hind-leg bones across this range of body sizes, Smith and Sidor found that as the animals got bigger, their front legs became proportionally smaller compared to their back legs. This pattern is consistent with the idea that their bones suggest younger animals may have relied more on all four legs before becoming more hind-limb-dominant as they grew.

Walking on two legs is one of the features that made shuvosaurids look so eerily similar to later ornithomimid dinosaurs. Showing that this trait may have developed gradually during growth, rather than being present from hatching, adds a new dimension to how these animals lived and how their body plan came to be.

Filling a Gap in Time and Geography

Before this discovery, only three named shuvosaurid species existed in the scientific literature. Shuvosaurus inexpectatus comes from western Texas and is roughly 219 to 220 million years old. Effigia okeeffeae hails from Ghost Ranch in northern New Mexico and is younger, at about 204 to 208 million years old. Sillosuchus longicervix is known from Argentina but lacks skull material, making detailed comparisons difficult. At approximately 215 million years old, Sonselasuchus cedrus slots neatly between the Texas and New Mexico species in both time and geography.

A family-tree analysis placed Sonselasuchus in a group with Effigia and Shuvosaurus, though the exact branching order among the three couldn’t be fully worked out, likely because different bones are preserved for different species, making direct comparisons incomplete in some areas. The researchers noted that the oldest known shuvosaurid fossils come from the Middle Triassic, including discoveries in Zambia, indicating the group had a long evolutionary history stretching across much of the ancient supercontinent.

With 36 or more individuals of varying sizes from a single site, Sonselasuchus cedrus offers a rare window into the life history of a single species, something almost unheard of for animals this ancient. The sheer volume of material will likely fuel research for years to come, helping scientists understand not just shuvosaurids but the broader story of how crocodile-line reptiles once rivaled dinosaurs in ecological diversity before their dramatic decline. For an animal that looked like an ostrich but was built on a crocodile blueprint, that story remains one of evolution’s most surprising plot twists.


Paper Notes

Limitations

Because nearly all bones from the Kaye Quarry were found separated and not connected to one another, individual skeletons cannot be reconstructed, and referring specific bones to specific individuals is not possible. The minimum number of 36 individuals is based on the most abundant unique element, the lower portion of the left thigh bone, meaning the actual number of individuals could be higher. The size variation in the sample is attributed to differences in growth stage, though the authors acknowledge that other sources of variation within a single species may offer alternative explanations. The family-tree analysis could not fully resolve the relationships among the three named shuvosaurid groups, likely because of non-overlapping missing data, particularly for the skull of Shuvosaurus. Additionally, Sillosuchus longicervix was not observed firsthand by the authors; comparisons were based on published descriptions. Skull bones from the quarry are relatively rare, and certain body bones may lack the distinguishing features needed to confidently identify them as shuvosaurid.

Funding and Disclosures

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors. No specific external funding sources were detailed in the paper.

Publication Details

Authors: Elliott Armour Smith and Christian A. Sidor, Department of Biology and Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A. | Title: “Osteology and relationships of a new shuvosaurid (Pseudosuchia, Poposauroidea) from the Upper Triassic Chinle Formation of Petrified Forest National Park, Arizona, U.S.A.” | Journal: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology | DOI: 10.1080/02724634.2025.2604859 | Published online: March 8, 2026 | Submitted: May 29, 2025; Revisions received: November 13, 2025; Accepted: November 18, 2025

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment