Two angry women arguing in a park in winter

(© Antonioguillem - stock.adobe.com)

Americans Are Losing Friends Over Politics at Record Rates. Democrats Were More Likely to Say They Walked Away.

In A Nutshell

  • More than a third of Americans (37%) report having lost at least one relationship due to political differences, including friendships, family ties, coworker relationships, and romantic partnerships, with most losing more than one.
  • Democrats were more likely than Republicans to report a political breakup, and among those who had one, 66% of Democrats said they were the ones who ended it, compared to 27% of Republicans.
  • Political breakups have surged since 2016 and may be accelerating: the 2024 election produced a higher breakup rate than the 2016 election in roughly half the time, though researchers caution the evidence is limited.
  • People who experienced political breakups held more hostile and distorted views of the other side, rating opposing voters nearly eight points colder on a 100-point scale and significantly overestimating how extreme opponents’ beliefs actually are.

Friendships have ended over it. Family dinners have gotten awkward and stayed that way. For a growing number of Americans, politics hasn’t just created tension; it has cost them relationships entirely.

A large-scale study published in PNAS Nexus found that 37 percent of Americans reported losing a relationship with a friend, family member, romantic partner, or coworker because of political differences. That’s roughly four in ten adults who say politics actually ended a relationship. A clear pattern also emerged in who’s doing the splitting: Democrats were more likely than Republicans to report having lost a relationship over politics, and among those who had a breakup in one survey, Democrats were more likely to say they initiated the split.

“Given the role of exposure to opposing views in building political tolerance, these ‘political breakups’ are a troubling sign for the health of a democracy,” the researchers wrote. “And given the importance of relationships for well-being, they have implications for the health of citizens as well.”

Friendships Bear the Brunt of Political Breakups

Psychologists Mertcan Güngör and Peter H. Ditto, both from the University of California, Irvine, drew on four separate datasets with a combined 3,791 participants, supplemented by data from the American National Election Studies. Their most recent dataset came from a nationally representative sample of 1,000 U.S. adults surveyed through YouGov in April 2025.

Among those who reported a political breakup, 62 percent said they’d lost a friend, 40 percent a family member, 29 percent a coworker, and 10 percent a romantic partner. More than half said they’d lost more than one type of relationship.

Friendships may be especially at risk. Close enough that political disagreements tend to come up, but without the structural glue of shared finances, children, or decades-long bonds that hold romantic and family relationships together, friendships have fewer reasons to survive a serious political rift.

In the YouGov survey, about 46 percent of Democrats reported a political breakup, compared with roughly 29 percent of Republicans and 39 percent of Independents. Even after accounting for partisan strength and demographic differences, Democrats were still more likely to report having lost a relationship.

breakup
More than a third of Americans have had a political breakup, and the trend has been accelerating since 2016. (Photo by Alena Darmel from Pexels)

Democrats Are More Likely to Initiate Political Breakups

In a separate survey of about 950 adults conducted through Prolific the day before the 2024 presidential election, the researchers examined how these splits unfold. Among those who’d had a political breakup, 48 percent said they were the one who ended the relationship, while only 27 percent said the other person did. Twenty percent described it as mutual.

Among Democrats specifically, 66 percent of those who’d experienced a breakup said they were the ones who walked away, compared with just 27 percent of Republicans. Both parties tended to describe the person they split from as sitting at the extreme end of the political spectrum.

Political breakups also appear to have surged starting around 2016. Of participants who’d had a breakup, 96 percent placed their most painful split in 2016 or later, with spikes in presidential election years. After the 2016 election, about 14 percent of Americans reported losing relationships because of that race; a survey conducted only five and a half months after the 2024 election put that figure at 18 percent. Researchers said the pattern suggests the trend may be intensifying, though they cautioned that the evidence is limited and election timing may affect recall.

Political Breakups Are Tied to Distorted Views of the Other Side

Perhaps the most unsettling finding involves what political breakups appear to do to people’s attitudes. Those who had lost relationships felt notably colder toward political opponents, and that hostility was aimed more at ordinary voters than at political leaders.

On a standard 100-point warmth scale, people who’d had political breakups rated opposing voters nearly eight points colder than their fellow partisans who hadn’t had a breakup. Among those who initiated the breakup themselves, hostility toward opposing voters was even sharper.

People who’d experienced breakups also held more distorted views of what opponents actually believe. In a 2017 survey, Democrats with breakups overestimated the percentage of Republicans who agreed with white nationalists by about 12.6 percentage points more than Democrats without breakups. Republicans with breakups overestimated the percentage of Democrats who thought most white people in America are racist by about 14.6 percentage points more.

Researchers offered several possible explanations: losing someone with different views may remove one of the few windows into why the other side thinks the way it does, and after a split, people may gravitate toward exaggerated media portrayals to justify their decision. Because all studies were snapshots in time rather than tracking the same people over years, the team could not determine whether hostility comes before a breakup or results from it. Researchers suspect it runs both ways: a cycle where hostility leads to breakups that generate still more hostility.

As Americans retreat into politically like-minded circles, the cross-party relationships that research has linked to greater tolerance keep disappearing. Polarization, it turns out, isn’t just making social connections unpleasant. For millions of Americans, it’s ending them.


Disclaimer: This article is based on findings from a research study published in a peer-reviewed journal. The results reflect associations observed in survey data and should not be interpreted as definitive proof of cause and effect. Sample sizes, methodology, and potential limitations are discussed in the Paper Notes section below.


Paper Notes

Limitations

All datasets except one came from online opt-in panels, which tend to attract people more interested in politics than the general population, potentially inflating the breakup estimates. All data were self-reported, raising concerns about memory and motivation. Earlier breakups may be harder to recall, and friendships often dissolve gradually rather than through a clear conversation, meaning the person on the receiving end may not realize the relationship ended over politics. Social desirability may also play a role: the researchers found some evidence suggesting Republicans may underreport breakups while Democrats may over-report them. Finally, because all studies were cross-sectional rather than longitudinal, the team cannot establish whether political breakups cause increased hostility or result from it.

Funding and Disclosures

This research received no external funding. The authors declared no competing interests. Studies 1 and 2 were approved by the University of California, Irvine Institutional Review Board (protocols #3298 and #2007-5740, respectively). Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Publication Details

Title: Political breakups: Interpersonal consequences of polarization | Authors: Mertcan Güngör and Peter H. Ditto, Department of Psychology, University of California, Irvine | Journal: PNAS Nexus, Volume 5, Issue 5, 2026 | Published: May 5, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag067 | Editor: David Campbell | Data Availability: Datasets for Studies 1, 2, and 4 are available on OSF (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7CJHK). The Study 3 dataset is available through the Roper Center for Public Opinion Research. American National Election Studies data are available through the ANES website.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment

4 Comments

  1. Peter York says:

    it’s because both sides think the other is immoral. conservatives are right. leftists are hoodwinked by democrat propaganda.

    I first heard ‘Republicans are racist’ around 1959. my parents had voted for Adlai both times despite the fact that dad was a sergeant in Ike’s army in WWII, we were a Kennedy family, and everyone I knew seemed to believe that Republicans were indeed racist.

    it so happens that I’ve been reading since I was five years old, and as the decades have gone by I’ve realized which side is comprised of dirty grifter traitor power-mad criminals…funny how so many democrats have believed in those liars for over half a century!

    anyone asking me if I like Trump with a lit-up look in her eye is not worth answering: s/he has the mental development of a fourth grader and will not respond to any reasonable arguments, but rather will erupt in seething hate.

    the left are orcs. 90% of public school teachers are democrats; take a look at their brainwashed hateful racist product.

  2. Thomas Miller says:

    Well I can say this and this is that until 2018 I was a Republican. I was one for 55 years and then came Trump. By 2018 I concluded the Republican Party had lost its darn mind, heart and soul. I went independent. But my family is still 95% MAGA. It is impossible to have a discussion with my MAGA family, because you could say the sky is blue and they’ll say no, it is azure. They believe in myths, they will quickly change course if they find their position is not tenable and they spend so much time watching FOX they have honed a skill that is more about stomping on you than having a civil discussion about politics. They position themselves like Trump, a man who doesn’t like to present plans. If you have no plan, anything you say can be taken in any direction and that is how they are now. They will look you in the face and say, “I never said that” but I know for a fact that 5 minutes ago, they said it. I’m in my mid-70’s and the stress affects my breathing issues and I don’t have the time or stamina to deal with them. Maybe someday.

    1. Jake Fontaine says:

      @Thomas Miller – You’re not alone. Trump’s approval is in the low 30s and will continue to fall as gas hits $7/gal and all he can do is steal $1 billion from taxpayers for his gold-plated ballroom. The 68%+ that oppose him aren’t all Dems, either–plenty of center-right independents and former Repubs in the mix. These are your new friends.

    2. Peter York says:

      Thomas Miller: we believe in myths like the sovereignty of the INDIVIDUAL, not collectivist groups. the left finds the Constitution an obstacle to their drive for permanent power.

      if you don’t recognize that vital distinction, what kind of ‘Republican’ were you?