woman eating meat

Credit: Brock Wegner For Unsplash+

Women Over 50 With Low Protein Intake Face Dramatically Higher Odds of Losing Basic Physical Independence

In A Nutshell

  • Women aged 50 to 65 who ate the fewest protein-rich foods had more than double the odds of difficulty using the toilet compared to women who ate more protein.
  • A study of 38,073 adults across 27 European countries found that low protein intake was linked to higher odds of muscle weakness and physical difficulties in older adults.
  • Men with low protein intake were more likely to develop weak grip strength, while women were more likely to struggle with walking, bending, reaching overhead, and grocery shopping.
  • Older adults generally need more protein than younger adults, not less, because the body becomes less efficient at absorbing it with age.

Getting dressed, walking to the kitchen, or simply using the bathroom. These are everyday moments most people take for granted. But for millions of older adults across Europe, those tasks are becoming increasingly difficult. A large study tracking more than 38,000 adults across 27 countries has found that eating fewer protein-rich foods may be one warning sign linked to later physical difficulties, and the odds look different depending on age and gender.

Published in the journal Nutrients, the research drew on data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe and found that older adults who reported the lowest protein intake were more likely to develop muscle weakness and physical difficulties over time. Women between the ages of 50 and 65 in that lowest group had more than double the odds of difficulty using the toilet compared to women who ate more protein-rich foods.

Men with low protein intake were more likely to show weak grip strength, a well-established early warning sign of physical decline, while women were more likely to struggle with walking, bending, reaching overhead, and grocery shopping.

Low Protein Intake and Physical Decline: A 38,000-Person Dataset

Researchers analyzed data from 38,073 adults aged 50 and older across 27 European countries. Participants were first surveyed in 2019 and 2020, then followed up in 2021 and 2022, letting researchers track whether eating habits at baseline corresponded with physical difficulties that emerged over the following two years.

Rather than tracking exact grams of food, the study asked participants how often in a typical week they ate from three food groups: dairy products like milk, cheese, or yogurt; legumes and eggs; and meat, fish, or poultry. Researchers combined those answers into a single score, and those who fell in the bottom 10% were classified as having low protein intake.

Grip strength (how hard someone can squeeze with their hand) was tested using a handheld device, with scores below specific thresholds flagging potential muscle weakness. Participants were also asked whether they had lasting difficulty with activities from walking 100 meters and climbing stairs to bathing, using the toilet, and shopping for groceries.

Low protein intake was more common among people who were not physically active, those with higher depression levels, and those who had low grip strength at follow-up. People with higher education levels were somewhat more likely to eat protein-rich foods regularly, pointing to the role of nutritional knowledge and economic access.

protein intake
Everyday foods, such as milk, yogurt, eggs, legumes, fish, and poultry, may collectively support healthier aging when consumed regularly. (Credit: L. Yousif)

Men and Women Face Different Odds With Low Protein Intake

Results broke down differently by age and gender, and in some cases, the gaps were wide.

For grip strength, men were most affected. Men aged 50 to 65 with low protein intake had about 39% higher odds of weak grip strength compared to men who ate more protein. Men 66 and older showed about 35% higher odds. For women 66 and older, the increased odds were about 21%. Younger women showed no clear connection to grip strength in the data.

Walking 100 meters showed higher odds of difficulty across all four groups. For tasks like bending, kneeling, and reaching overhead, women were more likely to show difficulty, while men were not. Tasks involving raw strength, like pushing or pulling heavy furniture, were more affected in men.

Among women aged 50 to 65, those in the lowest protein intake group had more than double the odds of reporting difficulty using the toilet, the standout finding of the study. Women in that same age group also had about 65% higher odds of difficulty shopping for groceries. Older women were more concentrated at the lower end of the protein scale, and the study authors note that older European women tend to eat smaller meals and fewer protein-rich foods than men.

Why Protein Matters More as Bodies Age

Protein is what the body uses to maintain and repair muscle. As people grow older, muscles become less efficient at using the protein they consume, meaning older adults generally need more protein, not less, to hold on to their strength and mobility. Many older people eat less than recommended due to reduced appetite, dental problems, lower income, or other health conditions.

Current dietary guidelines cited in the study suggest adults under 65 should consume at least 0.8 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day, while those 65 and older are advised to aim for at least one gram per kilogram. Among participants, nearly 60% reported eating dairy every day, but only about 10% ate legumes or eggs daily, and just over 30% ate meat, fish, or poultry daily.

As participants aged, the link between low protein and physical difficulties grew stronger, consistent with the idea that the body’s ability to absorb protein becomes less efficient over time.

Because the study is observational, it cannot prove cause and effect. Still, a dataset of more than 38,000 people across 27 countries lends the findings considerable weight.

For aging adults in Europe and beyond, what ends up on the plate may be one piece of the puzzle when it comes to staying mobile and independent. For women especially, the years after 50 may be a window when protein intake starts to matter far more than most people realize.


Disclaimer: This article is based on a published scientific study and is intended for informational purposes only. It is not intended as medical advice. Readers should consult a qualified healthcare provider before making changes to their diet or health routine.


Paper Notes

Limitations

The study’s authors are transparent about several important limitations. Protein intake was self-reported using food frequency questions rather than precise nutritional measurements, which could lead to some misclassification. The protein intake index used in the study was not formally validated against detailed dietary assessments or nutritional lab tests. The follow-up period between the two survey waves was relatively short, limiting what can be said about long-term changes like progressive muscle loss. Because the study is observational, it cannot establish cause and effect; it is possible that low protein intake reflects existing poor health rather than causing it. Physical activity and protein quality were not jointly analyzed in the main models, which limits the ability to separate their individual effects. Most functional outcomes relied on self-reported difficulties rather than objective physical tests. The study also could not rule out attrition bias, since frailer individuals may have been less likely to participate in the follow-up survey. Residual confounding from factors like inflammation, detailed diet composition, or socioeconomic circumstances cannot be excluded.

Funding and Disclosures

The research was funded through the Ongoing Research Funding Program at King Saud University in Saudi Arabia, through project number ORF-2026-277. SHARE data collection was funded by the European Commission and additional sources including the German Ministry of Education and Research, the Max Planck Society, and the U.S. National Institute on Aging, among others. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The authors acknowledged the use of AI-based language tools, including Microsoft Copilot-Pro and/or ChatGPT-4o, to assist with grammar and language quality, with final content and conclusions remaining the sole responsibility of the authors.

Publication Details

Authors: Rizwan Qaisar, M. Azhar Hussain, Salma Naheed, Khalid Saeed, Asima Karim, Firdos Ahmad, Sandra Haider, Maha H. Alhussain, and Shaea A. Alkahtani | Journal: Nutrients, 2026, Volume 18, Article 1058 | Paper Title: “Low Protein Intake Is Associated with the Risk of Functional Impairment in Older Adults in an Age- and Gender-Specific Manner: A SHARE-Based Study” | DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18071058 | Data Source: Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), Waves 8 (2019/20) and 9 (2021/22). SHARE Wave DOIs referenced in the paper include: 10.6103/SHARE.w5.800, 10.6103/SHARE.w6.800, 10.6103/SHARE.w7.800, 10.6103/SHARE.w8.800.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment