
(© DisobeyArt - stock.adobe.com)
In A Nutshell
- A study on wild island birds found that individuals sharing nest duties ended up with more similar communities of anaerobic gut bacteria than birds that did not.
- Only anaerobic bacteria tracked social closeness; oxygen-tolerant bacteria spread through the shared environment regardless of how closely birds interacted.
- Researchers controlled for genetic relatedness, isolating social behavior as the key driver of the bacterial similarity.
- Prior findings on the same bird population suggest the bacteria most likely to be shared through close contact are beneficial, not harmful.
Most people don’t think much about what moves between them and their roommates beyond dishes in the sink and shared Wi-Fi. A new study on a tiny island songbird suggests something far more intimate is being exchanged: the bacteria living in their guts.
Research on the Seychelles warbler, a small cooperatively breeding bird, shows that the closer two birds interact, the more they share a specific kind of gut bacteria. Anaerobic bacteria, the oxygen-sensitive type thought to spread mainly through close physical contact, were most similar between birds sharing a nest and trading off egg-warming and chick-feeding duties. Birds that merely lived in the same territory but skipped close contact did not share them nearly as much.
Researchers say the principle likely extends to humans. Previous studies have found that spouses and long-term cohabitees tend to have more similar gut microbiomes than strangers, even when their diets differ. This bird research offers unusually direct evidence of the underlying mechanism: social closeness itself, not just shared environment, drives the exchange.
A Remote Island That Works Like a Laboratory
Cousin Island, a 29-hectare speck in the Seychelles, holds roughly 320 warblers across about 115 territories. Scientists have monitored this population since the mid-1980s. Nearly every bird is individually marked with colored leg rings, and researchers know the age, sex, family relationships, and social role of almost every individual on the island.
“Cousin Island is small, isolated, and the warblers never leave it,” said senior researcher Prof. David S. Richardson of the University of East Anglia. “That means every bird on the island can be individually marked and followed throughout its life.”
Warblers live in small social groups anchored by a dominant breeding pair. Because good territories are scarce, some birds delay starting families and become subordinates. Some act as “helpers,” incubating eggs and feeding chicks alongside the dominant pair. Others simply occupy the territory without contributing to chick-rearing.

Tracking Gut Bacteria Through Breeding Seasons
Between 2017 and 2022, across 10 breeding seasons, the team collected fecal samples from hundreds of warblers. Birds were caught in fine nets and placed in clean paper bags with sterile trays to collect droppings without contamination. Blood samples were also taken to assess genetic relatedness between pairs.
“To uncover how gut bacteria spreads between social partners, we meticulously collected the birds’ poo over several years,” said lead researcher Dr. Chuen Zhang Lee, also of UEA. “We gathered hundreds of samples from birds with known social roles, including breeding pairs, helpers, and non-helpers living in the same group.”
DNA from the fecal samples was sequenced to identify bacterial communities in each bird’s gut. Published in Molecular Ecology, the study analyzed 648 samples from 345 birds, generating more than 27,000 pair-by-pair comparisons. Bacteria were sorted into two categories: those that can tolerate oxygen and those that cannot.
The Type of Bacteria That Tracks Social Closeness
At the broadest level, birds from the same social group had more similar gut bacteria than birds from different groups, a pattern that held for both categories of bacteria. Within groups, however, only the oxygen-sensitive bacteria tracked social closeness.
“We found that the more social you are with another individual, the more you share similar anaerobic gut bacteria,” said Dr. Lee. “Birds who spent a lot of time together at the nest, breeding couples and their devoted helpers, shared a lot of this type of gut bacteria, which can only spread through direct, close contact.”
Oxygen-tolerant bacteria showed no such pattern within groups. Any bird living in the same territory tends to pick up similar oxygen-tolerant microbes from shared food sources and perches, regardless of how closely individuals interact. Oxygen-sensitive bacteria, by contrast, don’t survive well outside the body and are most likely to move between individuals through close contact, which nest-sharing likely provides. Birds living in the same territory but never sharing nest duties had significantly less similar oxygen-sensitive bacteria than birds that did.
Researchers also controlled for genetic relatedness, separating the effect of shared genes from shared behavior. Relatedness varies widely within warbler groups because not all subordinates are offspring of the dominant pair, giving the team the statistical leverage to isolate social behavior as the key variable.
What This Means for People Sharing a Home
Most oxygen-sensitive gut bacteria are beneficial. Many probiotics belong to this category, with known roles in digestion, immune defense, and gut stability. A previous study on these same warblers found that the bacteria linked to higher death rates were all oxygen-tolerant, not oxygen-sensitive, which hints that close-contact microbial sharing may be more helpful than harmful.
“Whether you’re living with a partner, housemate, or family, your daily interactions from hugging, kissing, and sharing food prep spaces may encourage the exchange of gut microbes,” said Dr. Lee. “Sharing beneficial anaerobic bacteria could strengthen immunity and improve digestive health across a household.” Those benefits haven’t been tested directly in humans.
Non-helping subordinates that occupy a warbler territory while avoiding close nest contact appear to miss out on that microbial exchange entirely. Whether those birds pay a health cost for keeping their distance is a question researchers say warrants follow-up. One small island, it turns out, may hold answers to what is quietly happening inside households everywhere.
Disclaimer: This article is based on observational research conducted on wild birds. Findings have not been tested directly in humans. Results reflect associations, not proven cause and effect. The potential health effects of socially transmitted gut bacteria in humans have not been measured in this study.
Paper Notes
Limitations
Several limitations apply. Fecal samples were not always collected from every member of a breeding group within the same field period, though all comparisons were restricted to samples from the same field season. Bacterial identification relied on 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, which resolves bacteria to the genus level but not species or strain level. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing would offer higher resolution and help clarify whether bacterial differences translate into functional differences for the birds. Aerotolerance classification was performed at the genus level using AI tools, primarily Google Gemini 2.0, whose assignments were validated at 96.3% accuracy against Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria. GPS tracking of individual birds within territories was not feasible because current lightweight tracking technology lacks sufficient accuracy relative to the extremely small territory sizes on Cousin Island.
Funding and Disclosures
Chuen Zhang Lee was funded by the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) Norwich Research Park Biosciences Doctoral Training Partnership (grant BB/T008717/1). David S. Richardson and Hannah L. Dugdale were funded by a Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) grant (NE/S010939/1). Sarah F. Worsley was funded by a Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellowship (ECF-2023-433). Falk Hildebrand was supported by the European Research Council H2020 StG (erc-stg-948219), a BBSRC Institute Strategic Programme grant, and Earlham Institute funding. Jan Komdeur and David S. Richardson received support from the Dutch Science Council (ALW NWO Grant No. ALWOP.531); Komdeur was also funded by NWO TOP grant 854.11.003 and NWO VICI 823.01.014. Hannah L. Dugdale received a Rosalind Franklin Fellowship from the University of Groningen. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Publication Details
Title: Social Structure and Interactions Differentially Shape Aerotolerant and Anaerobic Gut Microbiomes in a Cooperative Breeding Species | Authors: Chuen Zhang Lee, Sarah F. Worsley, Terry Burke, Jan Komdeur, Falk Hildebrand, Hannah L. Dugdale, David S. Richardson | Affiliations: School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia; Centre for Microbial Interactions, Norwich Research Park; Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield; Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen; Quadram Institute Biosciences, Norwich Research Park; Earlham Institute, Norwich Research Park; Nature Seychelles, Roche Caiman, Mahé, Seychelles | Journal: Molecular Ecology, 2026, Volume 35, Article e70304 | DOI: 10.1111/mec.70304 | Received: 11 August 2025 | Revised: 23 February 2026 | Accepted: 3 March 2026 | Open Access under Creative Commons Attribution License.







