Heart-shaped steak

(Photo by Elena Zajchikova on Shutterstock)

In a nutshell

  • Fat hidden between muscle fibers may predict heart problems better than traditional measures like BMI or weight, especially in women. This type of fat can be detected through specialized imaging during routine heart scans.
  • For every 1% increase in muscle fat content, researchers found a 7% higher risk of serious heart problems, regardless of a person’s overall weight. The risk was highest in people who also had poor blood flow in their heart’s small vessels.
  • Not all body fat is harmful – the study found that fat under the skin actually showed some protective effects, while fat between muscles was linked to inflammation and blood vessel problems that could damage the heart.

Harvard study reveals potentially fatal flaw in how we measure obesity risk

BOSTON — Here’s something to think about the next time you’re choosing a steak: that prized marbling of fat running through the meat might be delicious, but when similar fat patterns appear in human muscles, it could signal serious health concerns.

New research published in the European Heart Journal demonstrates that people with higher amounts of fat hidden between their muscle fibers face greater risks of heart problems and death – and this risk exists regardless of their overall weight or body mass index (BMI). This discovery challenges our traditional understanding of how body fat affects heart health.

Obesity is now one of the biggest global threats to cardiovascular health, yet body mass index – our main metric for defining obesity and thresholds for intervention – remains a controversial and flawed marker of cardiovascular prognosis,” explains Professor Viviany Taqueti, who led the research as Director of the Cardiac Stress Laboratory at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Faculty at Harvard Medical School, in a statement. “This is especially true in women, where high body mass index may reflect more ‘benign’ types of fat.”

Think of your muscles like a marbled steak – some people have more fat woven between the muscle fibers than others. Scientists call this intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT), and the study found it might be particularly dangerous when combined with poor blood flow in the tiny vessels of the heart. Over six years of following 669 patients, researchers discovered that for every 1% increase in the amount of fat within muscle tissue, there was a 7% higher risk of serious heart problems – including heart attacks, heart failure, and death.

The study looked at a diverse group of patients who came to the hospital with chest pain or shortness of breath but showed no signs of blocked arteries – a surprisingly common condition that particularly affects women. Most participants (70%) were female, nearly half (46%) were non-White, and the average age was 63 years. About 46% of the participants were considered obese by traditional measures.

Using advanced imaging technology during routine heart scans, the research team created detailed maps of where fat was stored in the body. They looked at three main types: fat under the skin (the kind you can pinch), fat between muscles, and fat around internal organs. This comprehensive approach revealed something surprising – not all body fat affects health the same way.

“Compared to subcutaneous fat, fat stored in muscles may be contributing to inflammation and altered glucose metabolism leading to insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome,” says Professor Taqueti. “In turn, these chronic insults can cause damage to blood vessels, including those that supply the heart, and the heart muscle itself.”

In simpler terms, fat between muscles might trigger harmful changes in how the body processes sugar and responds to inflammation, ultimately damaging the heart’s blood vessels.

The study found that the traditional ways we measure obesity risk – like BMI or waist size – might miss important warning signs. Surprisingly, the fat layer under the skin (subcutaneous fat) showed some protective effects, while the hidden fat between muscles emerged as a stronger predictor of heart problems.

The research team paid special attention to how well the small blood vessels in the heart were working, measuring something called coronary flow reserve (CFR) – essentially, how effectively the heart’s blood vessels can increase blood flow when needed. Patients who had both high levels of intermuscular fat and poor vessel function were at the highest risk, with their annual risk of serious heart problems reaching 5.1% – significantly higher than those with just one or neither of these conditions.

These findings could help explain why some seemingly healthy-weight people develop heart problems while some overweight individuals remain heart-healthy. The discovery is particularly timely given the growing use of new weight-loss medications. “These findings could be particularly important for understanding the heart health effects of fat and muscle-modifying incretin-based therapies, including the new class of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists,” notes Taqueti.

The research team is now studying how different approaches – including exercise, diet changes, weight-loss medications, and surgery – might affect this dangerous fat distribution. They don’t yet know which treatments might work best for reducing intermuscular fat or whether reducing it would definitely improve heart health.

For doctors and patients alike, these findings suggest we need to look beyond the bathroom scale when assessing heart disease risk. This could be especially important for women and people without obvious signs of heart disease, who might benefit from more sophisticated screening approaches that consider both muscle quality and blood vessel function.

Paper Summary

Methodology

Researchers used cardiac PET/CT scans, which are typically used to check heart health, to also measure different types of body fat. They focused on a specific area around the 12th thoracic vertebra, using specialized software to distinguish between different types of tissue based on their density. The team tracked patients for about six years, monitoring for major cardiac events like heart attacks, heart failure hospitalizations, or death.

Results

The study found that people with more fat between their muscles had worse blood flow in their heart’s small vessels and faced higher risks of serious heart problems. For every 1% increase in the proportion of fat between muscles, there was a 2% higher chance of having poor small vessel function and a 7% higher risk of major heart problems. Patients with both high intermuscular fat and poor small vessel function had the highest risk, with an annual event rate of 5.1%.

Limitations

The research was conducted at a single medical center and was observational in nature, meaning it can’t prove direct cause and effect. The body composition measurements were taken only from the chest area, which might not perfectly represent fat distribution throughout the entire body. The study also couldn’t include exercise testing results since the heart scans were done using medication rather than exercise to stress the heart.

Discussion and Takeaways

The study reveals that fat between muscles might be more dangerous than previously thought, especially when combined with poor heart vessel function. This suggests that current methods of assessing heart disease risk using just BMI might be insufficient. The findings are particularly relevant for women and people without obvious heart disease, who might benefit from more sophisticated screening methods.

Funding and Disclosures

The research was supported by a Lemann Foundation Cardiovascular Research Postdoctoral Fellowship and the Gilead Sciences Research Scholars Program in Cardiovascular Disease, along with NIH funding. Several researchers reported receiving various research grants and consulting fees from pharmaceutical and healthcare companies, though these relationships didn’t appear to influence the study’s findings.

Publication Information

This study was published in the European Heart Journal in 2024, titled “Skeletal muscle adiposity, coronary microvascular dysfunction, and adverse cardiovascular outcomes.” The research was conducted by a team from multiple institutions, including Harvard Medical School, Mass General Brigham, and other prominent medical centers.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment