
(Photo by Pixabay from Pexels)
In A Nutshell
- Heat stress during wheat’s 15-day flowering window is projected to increase 32% by 2050 and 77% by 2090, while drought stress during that same period actually decreases in many regions
- Temperatures above 86°F during flowering can sterilize pollen and slash grain numbers: earlier flowering helps wheat dodge drought but can’t outrun rising heat
- China’s most vulnerable sites could see yields cut by more than half in rare extreme years by 2090; Canada faces the steepest relative increases in heat stress (up 243% by 2090)
- The findings suggest plant breeders may need to prioritize heat tolerance during flowering alongside traditional drought resistance to protect global food supplies
Global wheat production faces a climate plot twist. After decades of worrying about drought, scientists have discovered that extreme heat is rapidly becoming a serious threat, and it all comes down to 15 critical days.
A study modeling wheat at 53 sites representing about 91% of global growing regions found that drought stress during the flowering period will actually decrease in many regions as temperatures rise. But heat stress during that same narrow window? It’s projected to increase 32% by 2050 and surge 77% by 2090 under a high-emissions scenario.
Here’s why those two weeks matter so much. When wheat flowers, it’s exceptionally fragile. Experiments show air temperatures above about 86°F can disrupt pollen development and damage developing seeds. Severe water shortages during the same period can cause the plant’s reproductive organs to simply give up. Either way, fewer grains form. Strike before or after this window and the damage is usually far less severe.
The Unexpected Climate Flip
Scientists modeled wheat growth at 53 sites across 33 countries, tracking how heat and drought during flowering would affect harvests through 2090.
The drought finding surprised researchers. Warmer temperatures push flowering earlier by one to three weeks. Plants spend less time in the ground, which means they use less water overall before reaching their vulnerable stage. By the time wheat flowers, more water remains available in the soil. The plants essentially finish developing before the worst drought conditions arrive.
Heat stress works differently. Even flowering three weeks early can’t help wheat escape rising temperatures. The study measured actual canopy temperature (what the plant experiences) not just air temperature readings. Those measurements show daily maximums during flowering are crossing damaging thresholds more often, even in places where average growing season temperatures stay relatively moderate.
Who Gets Hit Hardest by Wheat Climate Change
In the most vulnerable sites modeled in China, rare extreme heat years could cut yields by more than half by 2090 under a high-emissions scenario. Russia, Kazakhstan, Pakistan, the United States, Ukraine, Romania, and Turkey also rank high on the vulnerability list.
Canada shows the most dramatic shift. Heat stress during flowering is projected to jump 135% by 2050 and 243% by 2090 in extreme years: the steepest relative increases among major wheat producers.
Why do some countries fare worse than others? Temperature patterns tell the story. In China, Ukraine, and Romania, daily temperatures swing wildly during the growing season. Average temperatures might look reasonable, but extreme spikes during the two-week flowering window happen frequently enough to cause serious damage.
India and Bangladesh show the opposite pattern. Average temperatures run higher, but daily swings stay flatter. Fewer days cross the danger zone during flowering.
For drought, the picture varies dramatically. Argentina, China, Bulgaria, Turkey, Iran, Spain, and South Africa face continued severe water shortages during flowering: available soil water can drop to the equivalent of just a couple of inches or less. Brazil, Paraguay, Ethiopia, Mexico, and New Zealand have better water availability and show minimal drought stress now and in future scenarios.
A few countries buck the global drought trend. Mexico, Morocco, and Tunisia may actually see drought stress increase at flowering because climate models project less rainfall during their growing seasons.
What It Means for Your Grocery Bill
Wheat provides roughly 20% of global calories and protein. About a quarter of production crosses international borders, meaning harvest failures in major exporters don’t stay local, they trigger worldwide price spikes.
The findings, published in Climatic Change, suggest breeders may need to give heat tolerance during flowering the same urgency long given to drought. That remains important, but now breeders face pressure to develop varieties that stay fertile when temperatures spike during those 15 critical days. It’s not a simple switch: heat tolerance during flowering involves different genetic traits than drought tolerance.
Within countries, vulnerability varies by region. In China, drought stress peaks in Xuchang while heat stress hits hardest in Luancheng. The United States shows similar patterns, with Lind, Washington most vulnerable to drought and Manhattan, Kansas to heat.
The researchers looked at severe stress events expected roughly once every 20 years. These rare years can devastate yields even when typical years show smaller losses. Those are the harvests that can strain grain reserves and push food prices higher.
For decades, the focus stayed locked on drought. But as temperatures climb, those 15 days around flowering reveal a different threat emerging. One that earlier flowering alone can’t solve. The agricultural community needs new tools, new wheat varieties, and a new understanding of what climate change actually means for food security.
Disclaimer: This article reports findings from climate modeling research using a high-emissions scenario (SSP5-8.5) and focuses on rainfed wheat production. Projected impacts represent rare extreme events (roughly once every 20 years) at the most vulnerable sites within countries, not average national yields. Actual future outcomes will depend on emissions pathways, agricultural adaptation strategies, and ongoing plant breeding efforts.
Paper Notes
Study Limitations
The analysis used one wheat model rather than multiple models. Only the highest emissions scenario was examined. All wheat varieties were assumed equally sensitive to stress, though actual varieties vary. Potential adaptations like adjusted planting dates or irrigation weren’t evaluated. The study focused exclusively on rainfed production. Benefits from elevated carbon dioxide on water efficiency weren’t included due to data limitations. Combined heat and drought stress occurring simultaneously wasn’t modeled.
Funding and Disclosures
Rothamsted Research receives grant-aided support from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council through the Delivering Sustainable Wheat strategic programme (BB/X011003/1). N.G. Halford is supported at Rothamsted by the Lawes Trust. The authors declare no competing interests.
Publication Details
Authors: Nimai Senapati, Nigel G. Halford, Malcolm J. Hawkesford, Peter R. Shewry, Mikhail A. Semenov, all from Sustainable Soils and Crops, Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, UK | Journal: Climatic Change, Volume 179, Article 28, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-025-04054-8 | Received: February 19, 2025 Accepted: October 7, 2025 | The research was published as an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








I’ve experienced something similar with tomatoes.
In 2021, we had an early heat wave, in May. We produced lots of heritage tomato breeds, and they were all in bloom.
The heat hit 34°C (93°F). All our tomatoes lost their blossoms.
The indeterminate tomato varieties went back into bloom, and they gave us a harvest. But about half our tomatoes were determinate, and never produced any fruit at all that season.