Lake Placid, NY

Photo by Gary Yost

Going Outside Won’t Help Loneliness Unless You’re Paying Attention to Nature, Study Finds

In A Nutshell

  • A Norwegian study of 2,544 people found that spending time on or along a lake was associated with lower loneliness, but socializing wasn’t the key driver.
  • Feeling connected to nature and emotionally attached to a specific place were the factors most strongly linked to reduced loneliness.
  • Doing lake activities alone was associated with an even stronger effect, though researchers caution that too much solitude can also be harmful.
  • The study is observational and cannot prove cause and effect; lonelier people may also seek out nature independently of any benefit it provides.

A quiet walk along the water might do more for loneliness than joining a group activity there. But the reason appears to be more personal than most people would expect.

That’s one of the more thought-provoking takeaways from a large survey-based study out of Norway published in Health and Place, where researchers found that spending time on or along a lake was associated with lower loneliness. What drove that link wasn’t bumping into neighbors or joining a group paddle. It appeared to flow through something more internal: a felt sense of oneness with nature and an emotional bond with a specific place. Doing those activities alone was associated with a stronger version of that effect, though the researchers are careful to note that solitude is not a simple fix.

Loneliness has been rising for years. According to the World Happiness Report cited in the study, 19 percent of young adults reported having no one they could count on for social support in 2023, a 39-percent increase from 2006. Health researchers have linked the condition to depression, premature death, dementia, and cardiovascular disease.

The Social-Contact Assumption

For years, the leading explanation for why outdoor activities help with loneliness centered on socializing. Get people outside, the thinking went, and they’d naturally cross paths with others, join walking groups, and rebuild fraying social ties. Programs designed to combat loneliness have leaned heavily on this model. But the evidence has always been surprisingly thin. Prior research has consistently found that interventions built around social interaction opportunities are not particularly effective at reducing loneliness.

Researchers Sindre Cottis Hoff of the Norwegian University of Science and Technology and Helga Synnevåg Løvoll of Volda University College designed this study to explore a different possibility: that the link between outdoor activities and reduced loneliness runs through a person’s internal connection to nature and place.

Inside Norway’s Largest Lake Region

Hoff and Løvoll surveyed residents living near Mjøsa, Norway’s largest lake, a region spanning 12 municipalities with forests, farmland, and freshwater. Mjøsa is widely seen as a defining part of local identity. In the fall of 2024, 15,000 people aged 18 and older received a text message inviting them to participate. The final sample included 2,544 respondents.

Participants reported how often they engaged in nine activities on or along the lake, including fishing, walking along the shore, exercising along the shore, enjoying life along the shore, summer and winter swimming, walking on the ice, paddling, and boating. They also reported how often they did those activities alone. Separate sections measured their sense of connection to nature, their emotional attachment to Mjøsa, and their loneliness levels.

Loneliness was assessed in multiple ways. One question asked people directly how lonely they’d felt in the past seven days. A separate six-item scale measured two distinct types of loneliness indirectly, without ever using the word “lonely,” an important distinction, since stigma around loneliness can lead people to underreport it when asked outright. One type captures missing close, intimate relationships. The other reflects feeling disconnected from a broader social group.

A woman in a jean jacket on a fall trail
Researchers found that feeling connected to nature, not socializing, may be what makes time outdoors ease loneliness. (Photo by Katie Drazdauskaite on Unsplash)

What the Data Showed, and What It Didn’t

More frequent activities on or along Mjøsa were linked to a stronger sense of connection to nature and a deeper attachment to the lake. Those feelings, in turn, were associated with lower loneliness scores.

Connectedness to nature, a sense of kinship with animals, plants, and the broader living world, showed the strongest association and was linked to reduced loneliness across all three measures the study used. Attachment to Mjøsa was also associated with reduced loneliness, but only for the type related to feeling disconnected from a social group or community.

Not every activity had the same effect. Enjoying life along the shore, walking along it, and walking on the ice showed the strongest ties to feeling connected to nature. For place attachment, the top three were enjoying life along the shore, walking, and summer swimming. Exercising along the shore stood out at the other end, with the weakest association with nature connection and the weakest with place attachment among all nine activities. Researchers attribute this to how attention is directed. Activities involving sensory noticing and aesthetic appreciation appear to deepen the bond with nature, while exercise-focused activity tends not to.

Solitude Strengthened the Effect, with a Caveat

When people reported doing lake activities alone, the indirect link between those activities and reduced loneliness grew stronger. Solitude, the researchers suggest, gives people mental space to turn their attention outward toward the environment rather than inward toward conversation.

That said, the authors note that both too much and too little time alone can be harmful. The finding does not mean isolating oneself in nature is a reliable path to wellbeing. Worth noting as well: the study is cross-sectional and cannot establish cause and effect. Lonelier people may actively seek out nature to compensate for unmet social needs, a pattern supported by research showing ostracized individuals have a stronger desire to connect with nature, which would partly reverse the assumed direction.


Disclaimer: This article is based on a single observational study and should not be taken as medical or psychological advice. The findings are associational and do not establish that spending time in nature causes reductions in loneliness. Anyone experiencing persistent loneliness or related mental health concerns is encouraged to speak with a qualified healthcare professional.


Paper Notes

Limitations

This study has several important limitations. Most critically, the data are cross-sectional, meaning they capture a single snapshot in time and cannot establish that outdoor activities cause reductions in loneliness. The researchers acknowledge that lonelier individuals may seek out nature as compensation, a possibility supported by earlier research on ostracized individuals’ desire to connect with nature. The sample skewed older than the general population, with people aged 18 to 30 underrepresented and those aged 61 to 70 overrepresented. Only about 17 percent of those contacted responded, raising additional concerns about representativeness. The study focused on a single geographic area, the Mjøsa region of Norway, where outdoor recreation is culturally embedded, and results may not generalize to other settings. The connectedness to nature scale had not been formally validated in Norway, though a Norwegian translation had previously demonstrated strong reliability in a student population. The relatively low proportion of variance explained for connectedness to nature (13.7%) indicates that this construct is strongly influenced by factors not captured in the model.

Funding and Disclosures

The paper includes no external funding disclosure. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. In an acknowledgments section, the researchers thank Arild Blekesaune for advice on the statistical analyses. During manuscript preparation, the authors used Microsoft Copilot to generate a list of grammatical errors in a draft; they reviewed and edited the content afterward and take full responsibility for the published article. Data will be made available upon request.

Publication Details

Authors: Sindre Cottis Hoff (Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway) and Helga Synnevåg Løvoll (Department of Physical Education, Volda University College, Volda, Norway). | Journal: Health and Place, Volume 98, 2026, Article 103617. Published as part of a special issue entitled “Loneliness Environment.” | Title: “Activities in natural environments as remedy to loneliness: The role of connectedness to nature and place attachment” | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2026.103617 | Received: August 31, 2025. Accepted: January 12, 2026. Available online: January 20, 2026. | License: Open access under CC BY 4.0. | Corresponding author: Sindre Cottis Hoff, [email protected]

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply