Iceberg in Antarctica

(© marcaletourneux - stock.adobe.com)

In A Nutshell

  • Antarctica, not the Indian Ocean, hosts Earth’s strongest nonhydrostatic geoid depression when scientists measure against a reference frame that isolates internal mantle dynamics
  • The depression has existed for 70 million years but shifted position between 40-30 million years ago and grew 30% stronger over the past 35 million years
  • Hot rock rising from near Earth’s core works alongside sinking ocean slabs to create the anomaly, challenging earlier explanations that focused only on cold, dense material pulling downward
  • The timing coincides with major Antarctic events including the continent’s breakup from Australia and the onset of glaciation 34 million years ago

For decades, textbooks and science articles have pointed to the Indian Ocean as home to Earth’s deepest geoid low, the term scientists use for depressions in the planet’s gravity field. Pull up a standard map of Earth’s geoid and you’ll see a prominent blue depression in those tropical waters. Case closed, right?

Not quite. The strongest nonhydrostatic geoid depression on the planet sprawls across the Ross Sea, tucked between Victoria Land and Marie Byrd Land in Antarctica. New research has traced this massive feature back 70 million years and revealed how hot rock rising from near Earth’s core has been reshaping the frozen continent since before the dinosaurs went extinct.

The confusion comes down to what is being measured. Standard geoid maps show the planet’s full gravity field relative to a smooth, spinning Earth shape. But when scientists subtract the part caused simply by Earth’s rotation, what’s left (the nonhydrostatic signal) tells a different story. That’s when Antarctica’s massive depression emerges as the undisputed heavyweight.

Scientists Petar Glišović and Alessandro M. Forte wanted to know where this Antarctic geoid low came from. Their research, published in Scientific Reports, uses a back-and-forth nudging technique to reconstruct mantle flow backward through time, tracking the movement of rock deep underground all the way back through the Cenozoic Era: the last 66 million years of Earth’s history.

A Depression on the Move

Antarctica’s geoid low has existed for at least 70 million years, but it hasn’t stayed put. At the dawn of the Cenozoic, around 65 million years ago, the strongest depression sat over the South Atlantic Ocean. Then, between 40 and 30 million years ago, something dramatic happened. The depression shifted rapidly toward its present position over the Ross Embayment. Over the following millions of years, from about 35 million years ago to today, the depression grew 30 percent stronger.

What caused this migration? Deep beneath the Northwest Antarctic margin, ancient slabs of ocean floor have been sinking for millions of years. These cold, dense slabs (remnants of tectonic plates that dove beneath the continent during subduction) created massive downwellings of material that plunged toward Earth’s core. Some of this rock now rests at the core-mantle boundary, more than 1,800 miles below the surface.

But cold, sinking slabs explain only half the story. The models revealed an unexpected broad upwelling of hot rock rising from the deepest part of Earth’s mantle, pushing upward directly beneath the geoid low. This upwelling has been active throughout the Cenozoic and probably started even earlier, back in the Mesozoic Era when dinosaurs still roamed.

Earlier research assumed Antarctica’s geoid depression came mainly from those cold, heavy slabs pulling downward. Some scientists thought contributions from shallower depths came from hydration-induced buoyancy above the subducting plates. Glišović and Forte’s reconstruction tells a different story. The rising material comes from the D-double-prime layer, a distinct zone just above where the mantle meets the core. The results point strongly to heat from deep within Earth as the main driver, rather than just water-rich material from shallower depths.

ross sea antartica
Ross Sea, Antarctica: The true location of the deepest depression in Earth’s gravity field. (Credit: Risto Raunio on Shutterstock)

The Balance Shifts

For the first 35 million years, contributions from different mantle depths rose and fell, making the geoid low fluctuate in strength. The deepest mantle provided a stable foundation, accounting for 30 to 50 percent of the depression. But around 35 million years ago, the balance changed. Material from mid-depths started contributing less while shallower hot rock grew more important. Today, this upper material accounts for 40 percent of the geoid low’s total strength.

The ascent of hot rock from the deep mantle into shallower regions over the past 35 million years amplified Antarctica’s geoid depression by 30 percent. As that hot upwelling rose closer to the surface, it made the geoid anomaly stronger rather than weaker: a counterintuitive result that speaks to the complex physics of how mass and buoyancy interact inside a churning planet.

To verify their reconstruction, the researchers looked at Earth’s rotation axis. When massive amounts of mantle material shift position inside the planet, they change Earth’s moment of inertia and cause the rotation axis to wander, a phenomenon called True Polar Wander. The models predicted a sharp hairpin turn in the axis path around 50 million years ago. According to the authors’ comparison, this prediction matches in timing and character the trajectories derived from paleomagnetic data, which records how Earth’s magnetic field direction changed through time.

The reconstruction also lines up with geology at the surface. Sixty-five million years ago, the modeled downwelling system extended from the southern Atlantic to the Weddell Sea margin, matching geological evidence of volcanic activity along the South Scotia Ridge during that period. The timing of major shifts in the geoid low corresponds with the final breakup of Australia and Antarctica between 58 and 50 million years ago, when seafloor spreading accelerated along the Southeast Indian Ridge.

What It Means for Antarctica

The hot mantle upwelling beneath Antarctica may help explain why parts of the continent sit at such high elevations despite being covered in miles of ice. West Antarctica’s elevated topography and the towering Gamburtsev Subglacial Mountains in East Antarctica both sit above this rising upwelling of deep rock. The results suggest that deep-mantle buoyancy may have contributed to supporting this high topography alongside lithospheric processes, including the stretching and thinning that occurred during ancient rifting events.

The major transition between 40 and 30 million years ago raises an intriguing question. Antarctic glaciation began around 34 million years ago, transforming a relatively temperate continent into the frozen wasteland we know today. Changes in the geoid can alter relative sea level by changing the height difference between the ocean surface and the solid Earth. The timing overlaps, but the authors stress that testing whether mantle-driven sea level changes helped create conditions for ice sheet formation will require future modeling that couples mantle flow, geoid changes, and sea-level physics.

Antarctica’s geoid low emerged from cold ocean slabs sinking toward the core and hot rock rising from the depths: two opposing forces that created the strongest nonhydrostatic geoid depression on the planet. That depression has persisted for at least 70 million years, but its evolution tells a story of Earth’s restless interior, where rock flows on geological timescales and reshapes the surface world above.


Paper Notes

Study Limitations

The authors acknowledge several limitations in their reconstruction methodology. The seismic tomography models used to initialize the convection simulations have inherent resolution limits, particularly in regions like Antarctica where seismic station coverage is sparse. Checkerboard resolution tests for the GyPSuM model show cross-correlation values of 0.59–0.90 and amplitude recovery of 53–87 percent across different depth ranges, with the weakest recovery occurring in the Southern Hemisphere oceans between 175–525 km depth.

The time-reversed convection modeling employs an adiabatic geotherm without thermal boundary layers to minimize thermodynamic instabilities, which may not fully capture temperature variations in the lithospheric mantle and above the core-mantle boundary. The treatment of non-thermal density anomalies (compositional variations not captured by the mineral physics scaling) as an effective temperature field means that in regions containing such residuals, the reconstructed temperature should not be interpreted literally as thermal perturbations.

The study reconstructs mantle structure only back to 70 million years ago and assumes approximately steady mantle flow before this time. This assumption is based on the observation that passive tracers reside in the high-viscosity lower mantle before 70 Ma, where flow patterns are relatively stable, but cannot be verified directly.

The quantitative amplitude and precise timing of geoid evolution show some sensitivity to the choice of mantle viscosity profile and seismic tomography model, though the qualitative features and major transition between 50–30 Ma appear robust across different model combinations tested. The potential connections to Antarctic glaciation and relative sea level changes remain hypothetical and require future coupled modeling that solves the self-gravitation sea-level problem with appropriate rheology.

Funding and Disclosures

This work was funded by the French “Programme d’investissements d’avenir” under the GYPTIS project (ANR 19 MPGA 0007) at the Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris. Petar Glišović received additional support from the Stephen Cheeseman Geoselenic Research Project at Queen’s University. Alessandro M. Forte acknowledges support from the University of Florida and NSF grant EAR 1903108. Additional support was provided by GEOTOP, Université du Québec à Montréal.

The authors declare no competing interests. Data availability: All data used in this study have been previously published in cited references. Additional results and data are available from the corresponding author. Code availability: The executable code supporting these findings is available from the corresponding author, with all numerical methods previously published in cited references.

Publication Details

Authors: Petar Glišović (Équipe de Géomagnétisme, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris, France; Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada; GEOTOP, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada) and Alessandro M. Forte (Équipe de Géomagnétisme, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris, France; GEOTOP, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada; Department of Geological Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States) | Journal: Scientific Reports | Title: Cenozoic evolution of earth’s strongest geoid low illuminates mantle dynamics beneath Antarctica | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-28606-1 | Publication Information: Scientific Reports (2025) 15:45749 | Received: 17 June 2025; Accepted: 11 November 2025; Published online: 19 December 2025

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment