Bayou,La,Batre,,Alabama,,Usa,-,July,19,,2024:,A

Credit: Carmen K. Sisson on Shutterstock

Study Finds Delta-8 THC Labels Too Confusing To Be Useful, And The Cartoons Don’t Help

In A Nutshell

  • A new study of 140 delta-8 THC products found that most edibles contained far more intoxicating cannabinoids per piece than the standard 10-milligram serving used in regulated cannabis markets.
  • Nearly 70% of vape product labels were too ambiguous for researchers to calculate how much delta-8 THC was actually inside.
  • Only about 12% of front-facing product panels displayed any health warning, while cartoons, candy lookalikes, and “hemp” branding were common across the sample.
  • Researchers say the findings point to an urgent need for stronger labeling standards and regulatory oversight of delta-8 THC products in the United States.

A single gummy listed as “one serving” could, depending on fine print buried elsewhere on the package, actually contain five servings worth of an intoxicating compound. That kind of labeling, spotted on a real product in a new study, is exactly what researchers are raising alarms about: buyers may have little reliable way of knowing what they’re taking or how much.

Delta-8 tetrahydrocannabinol, commonly called delta-8 THC, is a mildly psychoactive compound derived from hemp. Its rise to retail prominence traces back to a legal gray zone opened by the 2018 Farm Bill, which removed hemp from the federal list of controlled substances. Manufacturers quickly seized on that opening, synthesizing delta-8 THC from hemp-derived CBD and selling it in gas stations, convenience stores, and online shops across the country, often with little oversight. Available in states where traditional marijuana remains fully illegal, these products often operate outside the labeling rules that govern regulated cannabis markets.

That gap is already showing up in emergency data. U.S. Poison Control Centers have handled more than 10,000 cases involving delta-8 THC since 2021, including 2,075 in 2024 alone. Many involved children, with reported effects ranging from hallucinations and loss of consciousness to anxiety and vomiting. A 2023 study found that 11.4% of U.S. 12th-grade students had used delta-8 THC in the past year. Researchers from Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the University of Waterloo wanted to know what information, and what marketing, these products were actually putting in front of buyers.

Delta-8 THC Edibles Pack Outsized Doses

To find out, researchers collected packaging photos from participants in a large U.S. and Canadian cannabis survey conducted in 2021 and 2022, ultimately analyzing 140 unique products after screening images for authenticity. Gummies and other edibles made up the largest share, followed by vapes, with the rest split among tinctures, dried flower, and a handful of other formats. Most products appeared to originate from the United States.

On the surface, edible products looked reasonably well labeled: the majority stated how many milligrams of intoxicating cannabinoids were in each piece. But the amounts themselves told a different story. Potency ranged from 10 milligrams to 150 milligrams per piece, and most products exceeded 10 milligrams, which is the standard single serving for delta-9 THC in most U.S. jurisdictions with regulated cannabis markets. A buyer grabbing a standard-looking gummy could easily be consuming three, five, or more times a conventional dose without realizing it.

Some products made that problem worse by using labeling that undercut itself. One package stated “Serving Size: One [gummy] Bear = 5 Servings,” with each full piece containing 92.5 milligrams of delta-8 THC and 12.5 milligrams of other cannabinoids. Another directed users to start by “Consum[ing] ½ of one gummy to establish tolerance,” while simultaneously listing one whole piece as a single serving. For most consumers, figuring out an actual safe intake from instructions like those is genuinely difficult.

delta 8 vape
Delta-8 THC edibles can pack 15x a standard dose, and most products offer buyers little help figuring that out, study finds. (Credit: Billy F Blume Jr on Shutterstock)

Vape Labels Left Buyers Guessing

Vape products were murkier still. For nearly 70% of vapes in the sample, researchers could not calculate cannabinoid concentration from the label at all. Packages either listed milligrams without net weight, net weight without milligrams, or used language too ambiguous to distinguish between the two. One cartridge stated “Delta 8 • One Gram” without clarifying whether that gram referred to the liquid’s net weight or the amount of delta-8 THC present. Depending on the correct interpretation, a buyer could be getting a modest dose or an extremely concentrated one from the identical product.

Delta-8 THC Warnings Were Nearly Invisible

Health warnings, where they existed, were mostly buried on the back or sides of packaging. Only 11.7% of front-facing panels displayed any health warning at all. A given product might warn about impaired driving, pregnancy risks, or keeping the item away from children, or it might say nothing on any of those fronts. Fewer than 12% of products included lab testing information on any surface, leaving buyers no practical way to verify what was actually inside.

Cartoon Characters and Candy Lookalikes

While safety information was scarce, youth-friendly marketing was not. More than 43% of products used the word “hemp” in branding or descriptions, a framing researchers say can suggest a product is natural or non-intoxicating when it is neither. About 26% referenced the product’s legal status, often citing the 2018 Farm Bill. More than one in five products featured cartoons or illustrations of people, animals, or fantasy characters. Two were direct lookalikes of well-known candy brands, with one bearing packaging designed to closely resemble Nerds candy, cartoon characters included. Health-adjacent branding, with names evoking medicine or healing, appeared on roughly 13% of products.

Researchers concluded that “the lack of clarity and consistency in cannabinoid content labeling for delta-8 THC products, the absence of health warnings, and the presence of youth-appealing marketing highlight the need for greater regulatory control over delta-8 THC products.” Published in the Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, the study makes clear that a market built on a regulatory loophole has outpaced the rules meant to keep consumers safe.


Disclaimer: This article is based on a peer-reviewed study. The findings reflect a sample of 140 delta-8 THC products collected in 2021 and 2022 and may not represent current market conditions. This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical or legal advice.


Paper Notes

Limitations

The study’s sample was drawn from a subset of a larger survey, and only 6% of respondents asked to submit packaging photos did so, which may have introduced selection bias. Participants who submitted photos differed somewhat from those who did not, including higher proportions with bachelor’s degrees and greater self-reported financial ease. Nearly all products appeared to originate from the United States, meaning the findings say little about the Canadian market despite Canadian participants being recruited. Additionally, 16 of the 53 vape products came from a single respondent, which affects how representative the vape results are. Because most respondents submitted only one photo, researchers could typically see just one surface per package, so some warnings or labeling details may have been missed. Photos were collected in 2021 and 2022, and state-level regulations have continued to evolve since.

Funding and Disclosures

This work was supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Project Bridge Grant and a CIHR Project Grant. Lead author Meagan O. Robichaud received funding from the National Cancer Institute Cancer Prevention, Epidemiology, and Control Training Grant and a Health, Behavior and Society Distinguished Doctoral Research Award from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Robichaud was also supported by the Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science Career Enhancement Core under grant U54CA229973 from the National Institutes of Health and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Per the authors, the content does not necessarily represent the official views of CIHR, Johns Hopkins, NIH, or the FDA.

Publication Details

The study was authored by Meagan O. Robichaud, Torra E. Spillane, Ryan David Kennedy, and David Hammond, representing the Department of Health, Behavior and Society at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the School of Public Health Sciences at the University of Waterloo. It was published in the Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs (Vol. 87, pp. 209–221, March 2026) under the title “Product Characteristics, Warnings, and Marketing Appeals Conveyed on Delta-8 THC Product Packaging in the United States and Canada.” DOI: 10.15288/jsad.25-00034

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply