Heart,Shape,Drawn,On,A,Snow,Background.,Love,Concept.

Credit: Maksim Safaniuk on Shutterstock

Cold Weather Linked To Far More U.S. Heart Deaths Than Heat

In A Nutshell

  • Cold temperatures are linked to an estimated 42,735 heart disease deaths per year in the U.S., compared to roughly 2,242 for heat: about 19 to 1.
  • Most cold-related cardiac deaths are recorded as heart attacks or strokes, with temperature rarely noted as a contributing factor.
  • Cold drives up blood pressure, strains the heart, and makes blood more prone to clotting, putting people with existing heart or metabolic conditions at particular risk.
  • Researchers say health systems should build temperature forecasts into cardiovascular emergency planning and target high-risk patients with outreach before winter sets in.

Every summer, heat wave alerts roll out with urgent warnings about cardiovascular risk. But a new analysis of two decades of American death records tells a different story about which season is actually deadlier for the heart. Winter wins, and it isn’t close.

Researchers tracking cardiovascular deaths across 819 U.S. counties from 2000 to 2020 found that cold temperatures were responsible for an estimated 42,735 heart disease deaths per year. Heat was linked to roughly 2,242. Cold is linked to roughly 19 heart disease deaths for every one tied to heat.

Most of those winter deaths are recorded as cardiovascular causes rather than explicitly linked to temperature.

How Researchers Tracked Cold Weather Heart Disease Deaths

For the study, published in the American Journal of Preventive Cardiology, researchers drew on CDC cardiovascular death records covering adults 25 and older across 819 counties, representing roughly 82% of the U.S. adult population. More than 14 million cardiovascular deaths were recorded between January 2000 and December 2020.

Monthly average temperature data came from Oregon State University’s PRISM Climate Group. Statistical models then mapped the relationship between temperature and cardiovascular death rates, accounting for seasonal patterns and long-term trends.

A key piece of the analysis was pinpointing what researchers called the “minimum mortality temperature,” the specific temperature at which cardiovascular death risk is at its lowest. That figure landed at roughly 73.8 degrees Fahrenheit. Here’s why that matters: that temperature sits higher than what most of the country experiences during most of the year. For a large share of American communities, across most months on the calendar, temperatures already fall in a range where cardiac risk is running above its lowest possible level.

People walking in the snow in the city
Cold weather is linked to nearly 19 heart disease deaths for every one tied to heat, according to a major study. (Photo by Ken Whytock on Unsplash)

Why Cold Weather Is So Hard on the Heart

Cold does several damaging things to the body at once. Blood vessels constrict, blood pressure rises, and the heart has to work harder to keep circulation going. At the same time, cold makes blood more prone to clotting and can destabilize the fatty deposits lining artery walls, a combination that raises the odds of a heart attack or stroke in people who already have underlying heart disease.

People managing heart disease alongside conditions like diabetes or kidney disease face even greater risk when temperatures fall. Researchers flagged this group as particularly vulnerable, noting that the physical stress of cold can tip an already-strained system toward a serious cardiac event.

Heat is a real threat too. But cold affects far more of the country, for far more of the year, which is a large part of why the death toll it produces dwarfs that of heat.

Cold’s toll on the heart is not a new discovery, but it appears to be getting worse. A separate study cited in the research found that cold-related deaths in the United States more than doubled between 1999 and 2022. Whether worsening climate volatility is part of the explanation remains an open question, as the current study did not examine this directly, but the trajectory is hard to ignore.

A significant chunk of this burden stays hidden because of how death records work. When someone with heart disease dies during a cold snap, the official cause is typically listed as cardiac. Temperature is usually not included in the record. Researchers estimated that cold-related cardiovascular deaths run far beyond what hypothermia counts alone would suggest, and that public health tracking systems are likely missing much of the true picture.

Over the 20-year study period, cold accounted for more than 6% of all cardiovascular deaths annually, compared to less than one-third of 1% for heat.

What Cold Weather Heart Disease Deaths Mean for Prevention

Researchers argued that health systems need to start treating temperature as a cardiovascular risk factor in practical, operational ways. Feeding weather forecasts into hospital and emergency planning could help anticipate surges in cardiac events during cold stretches. Clinicians could treat certain times of year as higher-risk periods to check in with high-risk patients and make sure they are prepared before temperatures drop.

Older adults and people with existing heart conditions are the most urgent priority. Sustained cold spells call for proactive outreach, whether that means reminders about medications, blood pressure monitoring, or simply making sure people have adequate heat at home. Though the study did not examine socioeconomic factors directly, access to stable housing and reliable medical care likely plays a major role in who is most at risk during a brutal winter.

Cold weather and heart attacks have always shared a folk-wisdom connection. What this research puts in sharper focus is that the risk isn’t limited to shoveling a driveway or trudging through a blizzard. For millions of Americans, simply living through a typical winter month carries a measurable cardiac risk, one that rarely shows up in the official count.


Disclaimer: This article is based on an observational study and reports associations, not direct cause-and-effect relationships. The findings reflect population-level estimates and may not apply to every individual. Readers with concerns about cardiovascular health should consult a qualified medical professional.


Paper Notes

Limitations

Because the study examined population-level data rather than individual patient records, it cannot establish direct cause-and-effect relationships at the personal level. Using monthly average temperatures for each county may miss short-term cold or heat extremes within a given month, and does not capture what any individual person actually experiences. The monthly data structure also prevented researchers from examining whether temperature effects on the heart are delayed by days or weeks, which may matter differently for cold versus heat. Social and economic factors that could shape vulnerability were not formally analyzed. Counties with incomplete data were excluded, leaving out roughly 18% of the U.S. adult population, so findings may not apply uniformly across all regions.

Funding and Disclosures

No funding sources were reported for this study. All authors declared no competing financial interests and no personal relationships that could have influenced the work.

Publication Details

This study was conducted by Pedro Rafael Vieira de Oliveira Salerno, Ricardo J. Estrada-Mendizabal, Weichuan Dong, Avery Hum, Zhuo Chen, Colin Capenter, Mohamed Bassiony, Sanjay Rajagopalan, Sadeer Al-Kindi, and Salil V Deo, representing institutions including the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Houston Methodist, and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine. Published in the American Journal of Preventive Cardiology (2026), the paper is titled “Cardiovascular disease mortality attributable to monthly non-optimal temperature in the united states: a county-level analysis.” DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpc.2026.101514

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment