The Night Watch by Rembrandt

Spectators looking at Rembrandt's "The Night Watch" painting in Rijksmuseum in city Amsterdam. (Photo by Jaroslav Moravcik on Shutterstock)

People Who Visit Museums, Concerts, or Galleries May Show Signs of Slower Biological Aging

In A Nutshell

  • Adults who regularly engaged in arts and cultural activities, visiting museums, attending concerts, dancing, or making art, showed signs of slower biological aging in DNA-based measures.
  • The association was similar in size to what researchers found for physical activity, one of the most studied habits in healthy aging research.
  • Both how often and how many different types of arts activities people did appeared to matter, with greater variety linked to a slower pace of biological aging.
  • The study is observational and cannot prove cause and effect, but the results held up after accounting for smoking, body weight, income, and other lifestyle factors.

People who regularly attend concerts, visit museums, or paint on weekends may carry a less-expected benefit in their DNA. A new study found that adults who frequently engaged in arts and cultural activities showed signs of slower biological aging in blood-based measures, with an association similar in size to what researchers observed for physical activity.

Researchers from University College London analyzed data from more than 3,500 adults in the United Kingdom and found that people who regularly took part in arts and cultural activities, endeavors like dancing, painting, attending exhibitions, or visiting museums, showed lower biological aging scores compared to those who rarely or never participated. Published in Innovation in Aging, the study is the first to examine whether arts engagement is tied to epigenetic aging.

Like all studies of this kind, it cannot prove that arts activities directly caused the effect. Some unmeasured difference between frequent arts-goers and non-participants could be part of the picture. Even so, the results held up across several biological measures and after accounting for a wide range of lifestyle and demographic factors, lending the findings credibility.

Arts and Biological Aging: What Scientists Are Actually Measuring

Every person has two ages: the one on their birth certificate, and what scientists call their “biological age,” a measure of how fast the body’s cells and systems are wearing down. These don’t always match. A 55-year-old with a healthy lifestyle might have DNA markers that look more like those often seen in a younger person, while someone the same age who has smoked for decades might show the opposite.

Scientists measure this using tools called “epigenetic clocks,” built by tracking chemical changes to DNA that accumulate over time. They are useful research tools, but not perfect aging tests, and scientists still debate exactly what each clock captures. Some newer versions track the pace of aging rather than a fixed snapshot. This study used seven different versions, giving researchers a broader picture than most prior work.

Blue whale skeleton in the main hall of the Natural History Museum of London.
Going to museums or concerts may be linked to slower biological aging, a new UCL study of 3,500 adults suggests. (Photo by elRoce on Shutterstock)

How the Study on Arts Engagement and Biological Aging Was Conducted

Researchers drew on data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study, a large, nationally representative survey following thousands of British households over time. For this analysis, the team focused on 3,556 adults whose blood had been collected between 2010 and 2012. From those samples, scientists had already mapped chemical patterns across more than 850,000 points on each participant’s DNA, information used to calculate scores on all seven biological aging clocks. Participants had an average age of about 52.

For arts and cultural engagement, participants were asked whether they had, in the past 12 months, done things like singing, dancing, painting, photography, or crafting, attended art exhibitions, visited museums or libraries, or gone to heritage sites like historic buildings or parks. Researchers tracked both how often people did these things and how many different types they participated in.

Physical activity was measured similarly, covering vigorous activities like running, swimming, or cycling, as well as more moderate exercise. Participants also rated how physically active they considered themselves on a scale from zero to ten.

To account for other possible explanations, the research team controlled for age, sex, education, household income, employment, where people lived, and health markers including smoking, alcohol use, body weight, and existing illness or disability. The team used a more advanced statistical approach than many earlier studies, though it still cannot rule out all hidden differences between people.

Arts Engagement Linked to Slower Biological Aging Across Multiple Measures

Not all seven aging clocks responded the same way. Older, first-generation clocks built simply to estimate chronological age showed no meaningful link to either arts engagement or physical activity. Newer, health-sensitive clocks told a different story.

For one clock built on clinical health markers, people who engaged in arts activities monthly showed biological aging scores about 0.8 years lower than those who participated only once or twice a year. Weekly participants showed roughly 1.02 years lower scores. For physical activity, weekly exercisers showed about 0.59 years lower scores on the same measure.

Two additional clocks, designed to measure the pace of aging rather than a fixed biological age, showed consistent links with both arts engagement and physical activity across multiple measures. People who engaged more frequently and in a wider variety of activities showed a slower pace of biological aging. Both variety and frequency appeared to matter independently, a pattern the researchers connect to the idea that diverse activities offer access to different types of mental, social, and sensory stimulation, each potentially working through its own pathway.

When researchers focused only on adults aged 40 and older, the results tended to be even stronger, pointing to midlife and beyond as a potentially important window.

What Earlier Research Suggests About Arts, Genes, and Healthy Aging

Prior experimental work had shown that arts engagement can change how certain genes are expressed in the body. Listening to music, for instance, has been shown to affect gene activity tied to dopamine secretion and inflammation. But no large population study had asked whether that kind of engagement is tied to slower aging at the molecular level, until now.

Arts and cultural activities are increasingly recognized as a health behavior in their own right, one that may work through stress relief, social connection, cognitive stimulation, and sensory engagement. Those are possible explanations consistent with the paper’s discussion, but not yet proven mechanisms.

For now, this study does not prove that a concert ticket or museum visit will slow aging. But for middle-aged and older adults looking for enjoyable habits that may support long-term health, picking up a paintbrush or heading to a concert may do more than fill an afternoon.


Disclaimer: This article is based on a peer-reviewed observational study and is intended for general informational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice. The findings describe associations, not proven cause-and-effect relationships. Consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any changes to your health or lifestyle.


Paper Notes

Limitations

The study relied on participants’ self-reports of their leisure activities, which introduces the possibility of recall bias or inaccurate self-assessment. DNA data came from blood samples only, meaning the researchers could not assess whether effects differ across other tissues, a particularly relevant consideration for physical activity. The sample was restricted to adults of white European ancestry, limiting how broadly the findings apply to other populations. Additionally, the data were collected between 2010 and 2012, and patterns of arts engagement and physical activity in the broader population may have shifted since then. Despite a more advanced statistical approach, unmeasured or unidentified confounding factors remain a risk. Because the study is observational, it cannot prove that arts engagement or physical activity causes slower biological aging, only that the two are associated.

Funding and Disclosures

This study was supported by UK Research and Innovation [MR/Y01068X/1] and the Wellcome Trust [326117/Z/25/Z]. Additional support came through the EpiArts Lab, funded by an award from the National Endowment for the Arts (1936473-38-24), Americans for the Arts, Bloomberg Philanthropies (F024567), the Dharma Endowment Foundation, the Pabst Steinmetz Foundation, and the State of Florida Division of Arts and Culture (24.c.ne.900.834). One co-author was supported by a PhD studentship through the Soc-B Centre for Doctoral Training, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and the Biotechnology & Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC). Another co-author’s funding was provided as part of the Understanding Society fellowship programme, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council [ES/S007253/1]. The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

Publication Details

Authors: Daisy Fancourt, PhD; Lehané Masebo, MSc; Saoirse Finn, PhD; Hei Wan Mak, PhD; and Feifei Bu, PhD. Masebo is based in the Division of Psychiatry at University College London; the remaining authors are in UCL’s Department of Behavioural Science and Health. | Journal: Innovation in Aging (published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Gerontological Society of America) | Paper Title: “Does leisure activity matter for epigenetic ageing? Analyses of arts engagement and physical activity in the UK Household Longitudinal Study” | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igag038

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment