Palisades house in wildfire

Flames engulf a structure as the Palisades Fire rages during a powerful windstorm on Los Angeles' west side, showcasing nature's ferocity. (Photo by Arprince on Shutterstock)

As the world has watched the Los Angeles wildfires, seeing the loss and destruction that accompanies environmental disaster, some influencers have seen opportunity.

Selfie-seekers have been spotted using the wildfires as a backdrop for their social media content. Videos have circulated of would-be influencers filming dances and videos in the shadows of the disaster area. Others have faced backlash for making “get ready with me while I evacuate” videos or using the fires to promote wellness products.

As long as there have been front-facing smartphone cameras, people have snapped selfies in inappropriate settings – from Auschwitz to the 9/11 memorial. It also happens at more localized disasters such as motorway accidents and funerals.

Selfie-style content was also rampant during the Maui wildfires in 2023 and, as a result, the local Hawaiian community expressed how troubling it felt that their devastating losses were being turned into a social media spectacle.

In a personal example, I can remember going to Buckingham Palace in London immediately after the announcement of Queen Elizabeth II’s passing, and seeing people filming TikTok dances in front of the palace gates – even breaking out specialist filming equipment like ring lights.

Young couple snapping selfie while driving
Selfies are a must-have for tourists and travelers, however, it does seem odd to watch individuals photograph themselves in front of a natural disaster. (© Kar tr – stock.adobe.com)

The sight of someone filming for social media amid a somber physical setting can appear strange. But as someone who researches how people photograph themselves in the social media era, I have come to understand the nuances that cause and accompany this behavior.

Very often, the background of a photograph or video only carries meaning for the creator insofar as it can be part of their brand. This might, unfortunately, mean there is less concern for the people around them in favor of the audience that will eventually view their post.

As is the case with most self-focused content, the purpose of taking a video is often not to document a memory or to capture something beautiful. Instead, the aim is to perpetuate and maintain one’s own brand through social media.

Influencers’ posts are infused with symbols and subliminal messaging – often through a backdrop – that communicate their social status to their audience. I have researched the social signifiers that creators aim for with their content.

Surrounded by wildfires, the influencer might be trying to communicate heroism, empathy, suffering or understanding. A post from an area with global news attention might show them to be in the “center of the action,” which carries social capital itself.

Cognitive dissonance

Much content on social media is about self-presentation. To understand it, it’s helpful to turn to the work of influential Canadian-American sociologist Erving Goffman, whose 1956 theory compares self-presentation to an actor performing in a play. This “theatre of the self” includes a frontstage and backstage, with corresponding behaviors for each.

The frontstage is where the performance takes place and is tailored for its intended audience in mind. The backstage is where the preparation for the performance takes place and can often be messy or untidy. Sacrifices are usually made in the backstage in preparation for the frontstage performance.

Today, many frontstage performances happen online. Scholars refer to this as impression management 2.0. When the frontstage is virtual, the backstage remains in our physical world. The sacrifices made to achieve an ideal online impression all fall into our physical surroundings, and wherever the influencer or content creator finds themselves – even in the center of a natural disaster.

Men, couple taking selfie together
The normalization of narcissism? (Photo by Ketut Subiyanto from Pexels)

Obviously, creating content amid an unfolding disaster can be considered quite exploitative and widely miss the mark as far as the intended social meanings.

Research shows that those who are more likely to engage in this type of performance for impression management are also more likely to demonstrate a level of cognitive dissonance toward what is unfolding in the physical world around them.

This can be described as narcissism normalization and is often considered within the context of tourism and social media. Tourists now take photos of themselves with the sites they are visiting as backdrops with the aim to post on social media, rather than taking photos of the sites themselves. The prioritization of one’s online social environment, where they are the “main character,” can impede concern for the physical world.

Many of the LA selfie-seekers will have a genuine concern for the local community suffering in the wildfires, or they may themselves be part of that community. But their pursuit of impression management could potentially be taking priority over that empathy.

On the other hand, we should not forget that taking selfies and creating content are now normal parts of everyday life. For some, this might be the only (or best) way they know how to express their empathy.

Much good can come out of social media in response to disasters: fundraisers, safety instructions or even the comfort of a shared experience. But as climate change inevitably leads to more frequent natural disasters such as wildfires, this kind of content will become more widespread.

This presents a dilemma – that as we become increasingly exposed to “natural disaster content,” we may become desensitized to it, and even stop feeling the empathy that accompanies these images.

Lauren A. Siegel is a Senior Lecturer in Tourism and Events at the University of Greenwich.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

The Conversation

About The Conversation

The Conversation is a nonprofit news organization dedicated to unlocking the knowledge of academic experts for the public. The Conversation's team of 21 editors works with researchers to help them explain their work clearly and without jargon.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply

2 Comments

  1. Michael Kirkby says:

    I wonder how they’d react if it was their homes burning and we came and took selfies while their homes burned. It’s crass, bush and a few other things I can’t utter without utilizing colorful metaphors. BTW, find out which idiot flying their personal drone put the Quebec water bomber out of commission and prosecute them to the full extent of the law.

    1. Pajamas says:

      It’s sad to realize that people can be so desperate for the approval of strangers that they feel a need to exploit a tragic event such as these wildfires just for the sake of likes. This need for attention seems to reflect an emotional emptiness they must have in their lives.