Ejecta on Mars

By analyzing how far material ejected from an impact crater flies, scientists can locate buried glaciers and other interesting subsurface features. On the left is an image of a fresh Martian impact crater taken by NASA's HiRISE instrument. On the right is the extent of an ejecta blanket according to computer simulations of impacts. (Credit: NASA/Aleksandra Sokolowska)

In a nutshell

  • Scientists used computer simulations to show that the way debris spreads from small impact craters on Mars, called ejecta mobility, can reveal what’s beneath the surface, including buried ice.
  • Craters that form over ice-rich ground produce noticeably different ejecta patterns compared to those over dry, rocky terrain, potentially allowing researchers to detect subsurface ice from orbit.
  • This method could help future Mars missions identify accessible water sources without needing to drill, making it easier to plan for long-term human exploration.

PROVIDENCE, R.I. — Mars keeps its secrets buried deep, but every meteorite that punches through its protective layers scatters evidence across the surface. Scientists from Brown University now believe the scattered debris around impact craters holds a coded message about what’s hiding beneath the Martian surface, including potentially life-sustaining ice deposits that future astronauts could tap into.

When meteorites strike Mars, they fling material outward in what scientists call an ejecta blanket. The distance this debris travels compared to the crater size (known as “ejecta mobility” or EM) works like a fingerprint that can identify what is beneath the planet’s surface. This could include ice resources that could be vital for future human missions.

According to new research published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, when solid ice lies just beneath the surface on Mars, the debris from crater impacts doesn’t spread as far, giving scientists a possible way to spot hidden ice from orbit.

This means we might be able to map underground ice deposits simply by analyzing crater patterns from spacecraft orbiting Mars, without needing to send expensive drilling equipment to the planet.

How Impact Craters Reveal Mars’ Hidden Ice

Daybreak at Gale Crater on Mars
Crater patterns on Mars can reveal what lies beneath the surface. (NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS)

The international team, led by A.J. Sokolowska from Brown University, conducted sophisticated computer simulations of Martian impacts. Using a program called iSALE, they modeled what happens when meteorites hit different layers of material that might exist beneath Mars’ dusty exterior.

Their simulations focused on impacts creating craters roughly 50 meters across, similar to ones that have formed on Mars during the recent period of spacecraft observation. The team tested dozens of different underground setups, varying the materials, strengths, porosities, and layering patterns.

This study focuses on smaller, more common craters. These impacts probe the shallow subsurface that future explorers would need to access. They’re also “strength-dominated,” meaning the material’s physical properties have a stronger influence on the impact process than gravity does. This means that for smaller craters, the type of material under the surface matters more for how far debris flies than it does in larger craters, where gravity plays a bigger role.

Depending on what lies beneath the surface, ejecta can spread dramatically different distances. EM values ranged from as low as 7 to as high as 19 times the crater radius.

The team discovered that ejecta dynamics are affected by materials much deeper than previously thought, not just in the area directly carved out by the impact. This is because their dynamics are affected by what exists at deeper levels.

When impacts occur over areas with ice beneath the surface, the debris pattern looks distinctly different from impacts into purely rocky terrain. This difference is substantial enough that scientists could identify it in images from spacecraft like NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter.

Mars
Impact patterns are distinct enough that scientists can analyze them from images taken in orbit around Mars. (© IM_VISUALS – stock.adobe.com)

The researchers examined two small Martian impact craters with dramatically different ejecta patterns. One displayed an EM of approximately 19, while the other had an EM of just 11. The crater with the lower EM value is known to have excavated ice, exactly as the team’s models predicted.

If there is ice on Mars, that means there is water there, too. Finding water on Mars is crucial for any future human presence. Astronauts will need water not only for drinking but also for growing food and potentially producing rocket fuel for a return journey to Earth. Hauling all that water from Earth would be prohibitively expensive and logistically challenging.

The research also revealed interesting physics about how impact shocks move through different materials. When a meteorite hits Mars, it creates shock waves that behave differently depending on what materials they encounter. The researchers found that the contrast in acoustic impedance (how well sound waves move through a material) between different subsurface layers significantly affects how ejecta gets distributed.

Future missions to Mars could target areas where crater ejecta patterns suggest accessible ice deposits, potentially increasing the chances of mission success.

These impact patterns are pointing us toward hidden Martian ice without requiring complex drilling operations. For future astronauts who will need to find water to survive, the scars left by meteorites could ultimately be lifesaving signposts on an otherwise indecipherable landscape.

Paper Summary

Methodology

The researchers used the iSALE shock physics code to simulate meteorite impacts on Mars, creating approximately 50-meter-diameter craters. They designed 36 different subsurface models with various compositions and layering patterns, including different types of rocks (bedrock, breccia, sediment, regolith) and ice (porous and non-porous) in various combinations. The simulations tracked how ejected material traveled and calculated the ejecta mobility (EM) – the maximum distance ejecta traveled divided by the crater radius. The team measured EM at different thickness cutoffs (1 cm, 1 mm, and 100 μm) and analyzed how subsurface properties influenced these values.

Results

The study found that EM values varied widely between 7 and 19 depending on the subsurface properties. Higher material strength, particularly in bedrock, resulted in higher EM values, while ice-rich subsurfaces typically produced lower EM values. Surprisingly, materials at depths much greater than the excavation zone (1-2 crater radii deep) still affected ejecta patterns significantly. When ice was present beneath sediment, it could dramatically decrease EM values even if not directly excavated. The research also showed that the contrasts in acoustic impedance between different subsurface layers influenced how shock waves propagated, affecting ejecta dynamics.

Limitations

The researchers note several limitations to their study. Their simulations were two-dimensional and axisymmetric, which doesn’t capture the full three-dimensional complexity of real impacts. The number of material parameters that could be tested was limited, and some real-world effects like atmospheric influence on ejecta were not incorporated. The researchers also acknowledge uncertainty in determining exactly what minimum ejecta thickness would create observable albedo features in Mars imagery, which affects the practical application of their EM measurements.

Funding and Disclosures

A.S. and I.J.D. were supported by the NASA MRO HiRISE project. GSC was supported by UK Space Agency grant ST/Y000102/1. M.J. acknowledges support from the Swiss National Science Foundation (Project No. 200021_207359). The researchers state they have no conflicts of interest.

Publication Information

The paper “The Link Between Subsurface Rheology and Ejecta Mobility: The Case of Small New Impacts on Mars” was published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets (Volume 130) in 2025. The authors include A.J. Sokolowska from Brown University, G.S. Collins from Imperial College London, I.J. Daubar from Brown University, and M. Jutzi from the University of Bern.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment