A confused older man

Where you live may determine your risk for dementia. (PeopleImages.com - Yuri A/Shutterstock)

In a nutshell

  • Dementia rates among older U.S. veterans vary dramatically by region, with the Southeast showing a 25% higher risk compared to the Mid-Atlantic, even after adjusting for age, education, and health factors.
  • Traditional risk factors like cardiovascular disease, rural living, and education levels do not fully explain these regional differences, suggesting other location-specific factors play a major role in dementia risk.
  • Understanding these geographic patterns could help target healthcare resources and prevention efforts, potentially reducing the burden of dementia for millions of Americans in high-risk areas.

SAN FRANCISCO — If you’re planning retirement and worried about dementia, your zip code might matter more than you think. A new study tracking over 1.2 million American veterans across two decades reveals that dementia rates vary dramatically across U.S. regions in ways that can’t be explained by age, education, or health conditions.

According to the study published in JAMA Neurology, veterans in the Southeast develop dementia at rates significantly higher than those in the Mid-Atlantic, and the gap persists even when researchers account for traditional risk factors. In the Southeast—covering Kentucky, Tennessee, Alabama, and Mississippi—dementia strikes 14 out of every 1,000 people annually. Compare that to the Mid-Atlantic region, where just 11.2 cases occur per 1,000 people each year.

When applied to large populations, these differences translate into thousands of additional families grappling with dementia’s devastating effects.

Scientists from the University of California, San Francisco, analyzed Veterans Health Administration data spanning October 1999 to September 2021, following participants for an average of 12.6 years. The study examined 1,268,599 veterans aged 65 and older from all 50 states, representing roughly 20% of the total VHA population during the study period.

Dementia definition in dictionary
Dementia affects millions across the U.S., but some regions face higher rates. (© Feng Yu
– stock.adobe.com)

While the veteran population skews heavily male (98%), it includes people from diverse racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic backgrounds. Researchers used the CDC’s regional classification system, which divides the United States into 10 distinct areas.

After the Southeast’s 25% higher rate, the Northwest (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington) and the Rocky Mountains (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming) both showed 23% higher rates compared to the Mid-Atlantic region.

The South, encompassing Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas, registered 18% higher rates. The Midwest showed 12% higher rates, while the South Atlantic region had rates 12% above the Mid-Atlantic baseline. Even the Great Lakes region, despite including major urban centers like Chicago, showed increases of 7% above the Mid-Atlantic rate.

Why Traditional Risk Factors Don’t Explain the Pattern

Researchers anticipated that demographic and health factors would explain most of the regional variation. They systematically adjusted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, education levels, rural versus urban residence, and cardiovascular conditions including diabetes, hypertension, and heart disease.

Even after taking all of these into account, the regional differences barely changed. This persistence points to location-specific factors—whether environmental, cultural, lifestyle-related, or tied to healthcare practices—that play a significant role in dementia development.

Some clues did emerge from the data. Regions with higher dementia rates often had populations with lower educational attainment and higher rates of cardiovascular disease. The Southeast, for instance, had the highest prevalence of diabetes and hypertension among study participants. However, these factors alone couldn’t explain the persistent regional patterns.

Environmental and Lifestyle Factors

Living in rural areas has long been associated with higher dementia risk. While some high-dementia regions like the Rocky Mountains and parts of the Midwest do have larger rural populations, the pattern isn’t consistent across all areas. Rural areas face unique challenges that could contribute to cognitive decline: limited access to specialists can delay diagnosis and treatment, higher rates of social isolation reduce cognitive engagement, and environmental exposures may vary between communities.

An older woman with memory problems
Environmental and lifestyle factors by region may affect your risk for dementia. (fizkes/Shutterstock)

Air quality differs across the United States, with some areas experiencing higher levels of pollution linked to cognitive decline. Diet patterns also vary regionally, from Mediterranean-influenced eating habits common in some coastal areas to higher processed food consumption typical in other regions.

Environmental toxin exposure could be another cause for higher dementia rates. Different regions have distinct histories of industrial activity, agricultural practices, and environmental contamination that could have long-term effects on cognitive health.

What This Means for American Healthcare

Regions with consistently higher dementia rates may need additional resources for diagnosis, treatment, and support services. Understanding these patterns could help target prevention efforts and improve outcomes for millions of Americans.

Future research will likely focus on identifying the specific factors driving these regional differences. Researchers are calling for studies that incorporate more detailed environmental exposures and measures of social connectedness to better understand the complex web of factors influencing dementia risk.

Over 6 million Americans are currently living with dementia, and that number is expected to nearly triple by 2050. Identifying and addressing regional risk factors could help reduce this condition’s devastating impact on families and communities nationwide. While researchers work to understand why geography matters so much for brain health, families in high-risk regions can focus on proven strategies like staying physically active, maintaining social connections, and managing cardiovascular health.

Paper Summary

Methodology

Researchers analyzed data from 1,268,599 veterans aged 65 and older who received care through the Veterans Health Administration system between October 1999 and September 2021. They used a random sampling method that captured about 20% of the total VHA population during this period. Participants were followed for an average of 12.6 years until they developed dementia, died, or had their last medical encounter. Using zip codes, researchers categorized participants into 10 geographic regions defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. They identified dementia cases using standardized medical diagnostic codes and used statistical models to calculate incidence rates while adjusting for various factors including age, sex, race and ethnicity, education levels, rural versus urban residence, and cardiovascular conditions.

Results

Dementia incidence rates varied significantly across U.S. regions, ranging from 11.2 cases per 1,000 person-years in the Mid-Atlantic region to 14.0 per 1,000 in the Southeast. Compared to the Mid-Atlantic baseline, the Southeast showed 25% higher rates, while the Northwest and Rocky Mountains both had 23% higher rates. The South had 18% higher rates, and the Midwest and South Atlantic regions showed 12% higher rates each. These differences persisted even after adjusting for demographics, rurality, and cardiovascular health conditions, suggesting that location-specific factors beyond traditional risk factors contribute to dementia development.

Limitations

The study population consisted primarily of veterans, who are predominantly male (98%) and may not fully represent the general U.S. population. Veterans also have unique risk factors such as traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress that could affect dementia risk differently than in civilian populations. Researchers only had one residence record per participant, so they couldn’t account for lifetime exposure patterns or migration history. Education was measured at the zip code level rather than individually, which may not accurately reflect personal educational attainment. The study also couldn’t capture more detailed aspects of risk factors, such as quality of education or environmental exposures not represented in medical codes.

Funding and Disclosures

This study was supported by an Alzheimer’s Association grant (AARF-21-851960) to Dr. Dintica, a National Institute on Aging grant (R35 AG071916) to Dr. Yaffe, and a Department of Defense grant (W81XWH-22-1-0961) to Dr. Yaffe. Dr. Yaffe reported serving on data and safety monitoring boards for several National Institutes of Health studies and receiving fees for board memberships and consulting work with various organizations. No other conflicts of interest were reported.

Publication Information

The study was published online on June 9, 2025, in JAMA Neurology. The research was conducted by Christina S. Dintica, PhD; Amber L. Bahorik, PhD; Feng Xia, MPH; John Boscardin, PhD; and Kristine Yaffe, MD, from the University of California, San Francisco, and affiliated institutions. Data analysis was performed from October 2023 to September 2024.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment