A sample of Aspergillus flavus cultured in the Gao Lab. (Credit: Bella Ciervo)
In a nutshell
- Researchers modified mold-derived compounds into precision drugs that kill leukemia cells.
- The key to success was adding a small fat molecule that allows the drug to enter cancer cells.
- A specific transporter protein, SLC46A3, determines which cancers are most vulnerable to the new therapy.
PHILADELPHIA — Scientists have discovered how to turn molecules made by everyday toxic mold into highly effective cancer-fighting drugs, potent enough to rival some of the best treatments for leukemia currently available. This surprise breakthrough came when researchers figured out how to rework natural chemicals from common household fungi so they could enter cancer cells and shut them down.
The team from the University of Pennsylvania, Rice University, and other institutions may have solved one of the thorniest problems in cancer drug design: how to get compounds inside tumor cells where they can actually do damage. Published in Nature Chemical Biology, the findings offer a new approach to developing precision cancer drugs using natural ingredients that might be found growing in your basement.
From Household Mold to Cancer Medicine
The research centers around a group of natural chemicals called asperigimycins, which are made by Aspergillus molds, organisms that often live in damp areas like bathrooms, kitchens, and soil. In nature, these molds use asperigimycins to defend themselves against competing microbes. Scientists saw potential in these complex molecules, but at first, they had no effect on cancer.
That changed when the team made a tiny adjustment: they attached a small, fat-like tail to one version of the compound. This small chemical tweak turned a weak and ineffective molecule into a powerful cancer-killing drug, effective at incredibly low doses.
The new version, called 2-L6, was especially effective against leukemia in lab tests, killing cancer cells while leaving other cells, like liver and cervical cancer cells, mostly unharmed. In head-to-head comparisons, 2-L6 performed just as well as two chemotherapy drugs already used to treat leukemia: cytarabine and daunorubicin.
Cracking the Code on Cell Entry
One of the biggest challenges in designing cancer drugs is getting them inside the tumor cells. Many drugs work well in theory, but they can’t break through the cell’s outer wall. That’s what makes this discovery so important.
To find out how 2-L6 gets into cancer cells, the researchers used a tool called CRISPR, which allowed them to systematically turn off genes one at a time and see which ones made a difference. They found that a specific protein, SLC46A3, acts like a door that helps the drug enter cells.
When this “door” was missing, cancer cells were 30 times more resistant to the drug. That means cancers with more of this protein may be easier to treat with 2-L6, while those with less might not respond as well. Identifying this protein could help doctors predict which patients would benefit most from the treatment.
Once inside, 2-L6 works in two ways: it prevents cancer cells from dividing by interfering with their internal scaffolding (called tubulin), and it disrupts systems the cells use to recycle damaged proteins, which are systems that cancer often depends on to stay alive.
Turning Mold Genes Into a Drug Factory
To make these new drugs, scientists had to understand how mold naturally builds asperigimycins. They uncovered a set of six mold genes that work together like an assembly line, piecing together the molecule’s unusual ring-shaped structure.
The most powerful version of the compound, 2-L6, was made by taking this natural structure and adding a simple 11-carbon fat-like chain at one end. This made it easier for the compound to pass through cell membranes and reach its target.
In lab tests, 2-L6 worked against several different types of leukemia cells, including lines known as Jurkat, Mino, and Molm-14. Researchers measured how much drug was needed to kill half the cancer cells, and 2-L6 consistently performed well at very low concentrations.
This kind of precision engineering opens the door to new cancer treatments that are not only effective, but also more selective, killing cancer cells while sparing healthy ones. With thousands of mold species producing unique chemicals, the researchers say there’s a whole untapped world of potential drugs waiting to be discovered.
Paper Summary
Methodology
Scientists grew 12 different mold species and analyzed the chemicals they produced. They used mass spectrometry—a technique that identifies molecules by weight and structure—to find promising compounds, then matched them to mold DNA to see how they were made. To improve the compounds, they made small chemical tweaks and tested how well they worked on human cancer cells grown in the lab. They also used CRISPR, a genetic tool, to figure out which human proteins are needed for the drugs to enter cells and do their job.
Results
The team isolated four related mold compounds and found that only those with a ring-shaped “pyroglutamate” tag were able to fight cancer. Adding a fatty acid tail to one of the inactive compounds (creating 2-L6) made it more than 100 times stronger. It worked just as well as existing leukemia drugs and was especially effective against certain cancer types. A protein called SLC46A3 turned out to be essential for getting the drug inside the cell. Once inside, the drug disrupted the cell’s ability to divide and to break down proteins.
Limitations
This study was done entirely in lab-grown cells. It hasn’t been tested in animals or humans yet. There’s still a lot to learn about how the compound behaves in the body, including possible side effects or how long its effects last. Manufacturing the compound at scale may also be challenging, and some cancer cells might resist it by losing the transporter protein that brings it inside.
Funding and Disclosures
The work was funded by grants from the National Institutes of Health, the Welch Foundation, and university startup support. The researchers have filed a patent application but reported no other financial conflicts.
Publication Info
Published in Nature Chemical Biology in 2025, the study was led by scientists at the University of Pennsylvania, Rice University, and several other institutions. The full paper is titled “A class of benzofuranoindoline-bearing heptacyclic fungal RiPPs with anticancer activities.”








Was this research funded by the US government? If so, has or will the funding end with some of the recent cutbacks the government has announced which are currently used for research?