A woman sweating in hot weather

With extreme heat predictions for the future, outdoor summer activities may become unbearable. (Dirima/Shutterstock)

Climate Change Set to Crush Outdoor Summer Fun in Southeast U.S.

In a nutshell

  • Climate change is set to dramatically reduce the number of pleasant “outdoor days” in the Southeast U.S. (by up to 23%), while the Northwest could gain 14% more by the end of the century.
  • Across all U.S. regions, summers will lose comfortable days due to extreme heat, while winters may gain them, reshaping when and where Americans can enjoy time outside.
  • Popular destinations like Florida’s theme parks may see fewer visitors as outdoor comfort declines, highlighting how climate change could reshape travel habits, economic activity, and daily life.

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — Your favorite summer vacation spot might soon become unbearable. Research from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) shows that climate change will drastically alter when and where Americans can comfortably enjoy the outdoors. The study points to climate winners in the Northwest and climate losers across the Southeast, where up to 23% of pleasant days could vanish by century’s end.

The study, published in Geophysical Research Letters, reveals how rising temperatures will dramatically redistribute comfortable weather across America’s regions. The Southeast, including Florida’s tourism powerhouses, stands to lose nearly a quarter of its pleasant “outdoor days,” while the Northwest could gain 14% more favorable conditions.

Florida Tourism Faces Climate Threat

The forecast is concerning for families planning a dream Disney World vacation. Orlando’s traditional peak seasons may soon become too uncomfortable for outdoor activities, forcing visitors to reconsider when—or even whether—to visit these destinations.

The researchers caution that recreational activities, tourism, and daily life in Florida will undergo dramatic changes as comfortable outdoor days shift significantly. Across all regions, summers will lose outdoor days as temperatures soar beyond comfort thresholds, while winters will gain them as freezing days moderate.

Disney castle during daytime
Your plans to visit Disney World could be foiled by extreme heat in the future. (Photo by Alyssa Eakin on Unsplash)

The study takes a look at the concept of “outdoor days,” days with moderate temperatures that allow most people to comfortably enjoy activities like walking, jogging, or cycling. The researchers defined these golden days as those with temperatures between 50°F and 77°F (10°C-25°C), conditions most people find neither too hot nor too cold.

Using multiple climate models, the scientists analyzed historical data and projected future conditions under different emission scenarios. The results point to a stark northwest-southeast divide in future outdoor comfort.

While the Northwest region stands to gain significantly more outdoor days annually under high-emission scenarios, three regions face substantial losses: the Southeast (-23%), South (-19%), and Ohio Valley (-19%).

Economic Impact

This isn’t just about vacation planning. The researchers found strong correlations between comfortable outdoor days and visitor numbers at national parks. As pleasant days shift, tourist destinations must adapt or suffer declining visitation.

The study suggests that popular Florida destinations such as Big Cypress National Preserve and Orlando’s attractions will likely experience visitor declines by century’s end as comfortable outdoor days diminish significantly.

Looking at records from 1959 to 2021, the researchers found that most Americans already enjoy about 172 outdoor days annually, though with significant regional variations. Southern areas like California, Hawaii, and Florida typically experience more outdoor days than northern regions.

Recent warming has already begun shifting these patterns. Northern regions have seen slight increases in outdoor days as winters moderate, while southern areas show declining trends as summers become too hot.

Temperature Projections

Under high-emission scenarios, temperatures across the U.S. could rise by at least 5°C (9°F) by century’s end, with even more dramatic warming of 6-7°C (10.8-12.6°F) in northern regions.

For residents, these changes will affect everything from health to housing preferences. Communities in regions facing outdoor day losses may need to invest more in indoor recreation facilities and climate-controlled public spaces. Meanwhile, areas gaining outdoor days could see population growth as climate migrants seek more comfortable living conditions.

Funny man suffering from summer heat
Future hot summers may be too uncomfortable to enjoy outdoors. (© Studio Romantic – stock.adobe.com)

This study focuses on everyday experience rather than extreme events that the average person can’t always relate to. A lot of climate research examines disasters like hurricanes or wildfires, but this work addresses something more personal: how many days each year you’ll actually want to be outside.

The changes will be most dramatic in the seasonal distribution of pleasant days. The researchers describe it as a “broadening of the shoulders” in the seasonal cycle, with fewer summer days but more in spring, fall, and winter. However, for already-warm southern regions, the winter gains won’t make up for the substantial summer losses.

The study also examined how these projections would change under a lower-emission scenario. If global emissions reach net-zero in the second half of the century, the losses in outdoor days would be significantly reduced, making immediate action increasingly urgent.

The findings also add to growing evidence that climate change exacerbates inequality. Just as developing countries often face harsher climate impacts despite contributing less to the problem, within the U.S., some regions will bear a heavier burden than others.

Climate change isn’t some distant threat; it’s coming for your comfortable summer evenings, your spring picnics, and your fall hikes. While some Americans will have more comfortable outdoor temperatures, millions in the Southeast face a future with significantly fewer pleasant days. These aren’t just statistics; they’re birthday parties moved indoors, canceled camping trips, and theme parks struggling through emptier summers.

Paper Summary

Methodology

Researchers analyzed daily temperature data from the ERA5 reanalysis dataset for 1959-2021 and used climate projections from multiple Global Climate Models (GCMs) to predict future conditions. They defined “outdoor days” as days with moderate temperatures (10°C-25°C or 50°F-77°F) that most people would find comfortable for outdoor activities. The study examined both historical patterns and projected changes across nine U.S. sub-regions under different emission scenarios, including a “business as usual” high-emission scenario (SSP5-8.5) and a more optimistic low-emission scenario (SSP1-2.6). The researchers focused particularly on residential areas with population density above one person per square kilometer.

Results

The study found that while the U.S. currently averages about 172 outdoor days annually, climate change will significantly alter their seasonal distribution. All regions will see fewer outdoor days in summer and more in winter, but the annual balance will shift dramatically between regions. The Northwest could gain 14% more annual outdoor days by 2100, while the Southeast (-23%), South (-19%), and Ohio Valley (-19%) face substantial losses. These changes correlate with tourism patterns, suggesting economic impacts as visitors avoid increasingly uncomfortable destinations. The seasonal shift is described as a “broadening of the shoulders” in the seasonal cycle – with fewer summer outdoor days but more in spring, fall, and winter.

Limitations

The researchers acknowledge several limitations to their study. Global Climate Models struggle to accurately predict climate patterns in areas with complex geographical features like mountains. The definition of “outdoor days” is somewhat subjective since different people have different temperature preferences based on their context and experiences. While temperature was used as the primary variable, other factors like precipitation, wind speed, and air quality could also influence outdoor comfort but weren’t fully incorporated into the main analysis. However, sensitivity analyses showed the main conclusions remained consistent regardless of how outdoor days were defined.

Funding

The research was supported by the Community Jameel for Jameel Observatory CREWSnet and Abdul Latif Jameel Water and Food Systems Lab (J-WAFS) at MIT.

Publication Information

The study titled “Climate Change Impact on ‘Outdoor Days’ Over the United States” was authored by Yeon-Woo Choi, Muhammad Khalifa, and Elfatih A.B. Eltahir from the Ralph M. Parsons Laboratory at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. It was published in Geophysical Research Letters (Volume 51, e2024GL111607) and was received on July 30, 2024, and accepted on September 18, 2024.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply