Social media influencer

Many TikTok influencers are providing misinformation to vulnerable follwers. (© Tatyana - stock.adobe.com)

In A Nutshell

  • Most top TikTok contraception videos come from non-medical creators; only 10% were made by doctors, nurses, or other licensed professionals.
  • Over half (53%) reject hormonal birth control, and one-third express distrust in healthcare providers, often based on personal stories or opinions, not scientific evidence.
  • Overall quality is poor: medical professionals’ videos scored a median of 33 on the DISCERN reliability scale (classified as poor), with all other creator groups scoring lower.
  • Fertility Awareness-Based Methods (FABMs) were the most discussed (38%), but videos rarely mention the training, motivation, partner cooperation, and method-specific factors needed for effectiveness.

BUNDOORA, Australia — When millions of young people turn to TikTok for information about birth control, they’re overwhelmingly getting it from influencers, self-proclaimed “hormone health coaches,” and everyday users instead of doctors or nurses. A new study reveals that of 100 top contraception-related videos on the platform (drawn from five major hashtags and collectively receiving 4.85 billion views), only 10% were created by medical professionals.

Even more concerning, researchers found that 53% of creators explicitly rejected hormonal birth control methods like the pill, and 34% expressed distrust in healthcare providers and hormonal contraception. These statements of rejection and distrust were mostly based on personal experiences, subjective opinions, or non-persuasive recommendations, rarely citing scientific sources.

The findings, published in Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, highlight a troubling pattern: TikTok’s algorithm is designed to keep people watching, not to ensure accuracy. With 69% of TikTok’s users between ages 18 and 34, dramatic personal stories about negative birth control experiences often gain more traction than balanced, evidence-based medical explanations.

“The rise of contraceptive misinformation on social media is re-shaping patient-provider relationships and impacting contraceptive beliefs,” the researchers wrote. Such content, they caution, could influence contraceptive choices and potentially contribute to higher rates of unintended pregnancy.

Woman using TikTok app on her smartphone
TikTok videos are providing many users with misinformation about important health topics. (© Azulblue – stock.adobe.com)

Who Creates Birth Control Content on TikTok?

Led by Dr. Caroline de Moel-Mandel from La Trobe University in Australia, study authors analyzed the most popular TikTok videos under five contraception-related hashtags: #birthcontrol, #contraception, #thepill, #naturalbirthcontrol, and #cycletracking. They used a newly created account for an 18-year-old Australian female to reduce algorithm bias and selected the top 20 videos from each hashtag. Videos were excluded if they were duplicates, not in English, or didn’t provide information or advice about contraception.

They found that general uploaders, including influencers, created 58% of the videos, while people calling themselves “hormone health coaches” and “health educators” each made 15%. Most creators were White, female-presenting millennials from English-speaking countries, primarily the United States, but also the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, and Ireland. Other origins included Nigeria, Korea, and New Zealand.

When it came to reach, medical professionals’ videos had higher average views than other non-company creators and, along with general uploaders, the most followers. However, the two online companies in the sample had the highest overall views.

How Accurate Is TikTok’s Birth Control Information?

The team used DISCERN, a tool that evaluates whether health information is reliable, balanced, and well-sourced, to assess video quality. Overall, the results were poor across all categories. Medical professionals’ videos scored a median of 33, classified as “poor quality” (27–38 on the DISCERN scale). General uploaders and hormone health coaches scored even lower, and the overall median score for all videos was 27, also “poor.”

One reason for the low scores may be TikTok’s short format. The median video length was just 44.5 seconds, leaving little time to cover risks, benefits, or where to find more reliable information. Many creators failed to cite evidence or link to credible resources.

Natural contraceptive approaches, known in medical terms as Fertility Awareness-Based Methods (FABMs), were discussed most often (38% of videos), followed closely by birth control pills (35%). Videos promoting FABMs rarely mentioned their limitations or that effectiveness depends on factors such as the method used, sufficient training or instruction, motivation, partner cooperation, and natural biomarker variability.

“Importantly, they failed to mention that these methods are generally ineffective when used on their own,” Dr. de Moel-Mandel said in a statement. “This kind of misinformation, combined with a growing distrust in healthcare professionals can result in unsafe decisions and ultimately, unplanned pregnancies.”

Why Young People Don’t Trust Their Doctors

The study found signs of a growing disconnect between patients and healthcare providers. When shared decision-making expectations aren’t met, patients may feel pressured, dismissed, or even deceived — sentiments echoed in many TikTok videos.

Some creators shared personal stories about feeling brushed off or not fully informed about side effects, while others openly recommended turning to “hormone health coaches” or “health educators” instead of medical professionals. These titles are largely unregulated and do not necessarily indicate formal training or credentials.

Cleaning Up Contraceptive Misinformation

Misinformation about contraception can have serious consequences. They include discontinuation of effective methods, incorrect use of FABMs, or avoidance of hormonal contraception altogether, all of which can increase the risk of unintended pregnancy.

FABMs can be valid and effective choices for some, but success depends on multiple factors: the specific method used, adequate training, ongoing motivation, partner cooperation, and the natural variability of fertility markers. TikTok influencers rarely provide such detail, instead presenting simplified or overly positive portrayals.

The researchers suggest that healthcare providers should acknowledge the influence of social media and use consultations to correct misconceptions. They also advocate for more engaging, relatable medical content on platforms like TikTok to meet young people where they are. The authors note that growing distrust in healthcare can fuel negative narratives online; until those trust issues are addressed, social media will likely continue to fill the gap, sometimes, sadly, with misinformation.

Disclaimer: This article summarizes findings from a peer-reviewed study. The information is for educational purposes only and should not be taken as medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making decisions about contraception or other health matters.


Paper Summary

Methodology

Between August and September 2023, researchers analyzed 100 TikTok videos from the top five contraception-related hashtags using a newly created account for a hypothetical 18-year-old Australian female. Two reviewers assessed each video’s creator type, purpose, and quality using the DISCERN tool, with a third reviewer resolving any disagreements. Non-English, duplicate, or irrelevant videos were excluded.

Results

The 100 videos received 4.85 billion total views. Ten percent were made by medical professionals, 58% by general uploaders, and 15% each by self-proclaimed hormone health coaches and health educators. Over half (53%) explicitly rejected hormonal contraception, and 34% expressed distrust toward healthcare providers. FABMs were the most frequently discussed method (38%), followed by birth control pills (35%). Median DISCERN scores for all groups fell into the poor or low-to-moderate quality range.

Limitations

The study only analyzed English-language videos and provides a snapshot in time. The DISCERN tool was developed for written materials, which may not fully capture video content nuances. Categorization of creators relied on self-reported information, which could introduce bias.

Funding and Disclosures

The authors reported no specific funding or conflicts of interest. Open access publishing was supported by La Trobe University through its agreement with Wiley Publishers and the Council of Australian University Librarians.

Publication Details

Caroline de Moel-Mandel, Arielle Donnelly, and Megan Bugden. “Do You Know What Birth Control Actually Does to Your Body?: Assessing Contraceptive Information on TikTok,” published in Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, on June 30, 2025, pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.1111/psrh.70025

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment