Remains of the McCloud Glacier, 2024

Remains of the McCloud Glacier, 2024, photographed by Prof Pete Convey. "Note the clear nunatak at the mid-right of the glacier," said Convey. "This is named 'Manhaul Rock' and, when I was first on Signy in 1989-91, it was literally a small rock poking through the ice surface that you could walk/ski/drive a skidoo up to."

In A Nutshell

  • The Antarctic Peninsula is already warming faster than the global average, having exceeded 1.5°C of regional warming above pre-industrial levels.
  • Under the highest emissions scenario, the Larsen C and Wilkins ice shelves are likely to collapse by 2100, accelerating global sea level rise.
  • Current global policies put Earth on track for as much as 2.8°C of warming, far closer to the worst-case outcome than the safest one.
  • Aggressive emissions cuts this decade are the only way to limit irreversible damage to the Peninsula’s ice, ecosystems, and wildlife.

Two of Antarctica’s largest floating ice shelves are projected to collapse entirely by the end of this century under a very high emissions scenario, and a new scientific review warns that the choices made in the next few years will determine whether that future plays out.

Published in Frontiers in Environmental Science, the study draws on climate models, satellite data, and decades of field observations to map out three very different futures for the Antarctic Peninsula, the long arm of land that juts northward toward South America. Under the worst-case scenario, the Larsen C and Wilkins ice shelves are likely to shatter by 2100. Once that happens, the glaciers they hold back will accelerate into the ocean, driving up sea levels worldwide. “The future of the Antarctic Peninsula,” the authors write, “depends strongly on choices made today.”

Led by researchers at Newcastle University, the review is blunt on timing. “The choices made in this decade will determine which scenario is followed,” it states. Current global policies put the planet on track for as much as 2.8°C of warming above pre-industrial temperatures, far closer to the very high emissions scenario than the low one. According to a United Nations Environment Program report cited by the authors, there is effectively no chance of staying below 1.5°C under current policies, the threshold set by the Paris Climate Agreement.

Antarctic Ice Shelves Are Already Losing Ground

The Peninsula has been warming since at least the 1950s, outpacing the global average. Vernadsky Station, on the west coast of the mainland, has warmed by about 3.3°C over 73 years, more than double the global average rise of roughly 1.3°C to 1.4°C. Regional warming on parts of the Peninsula already exceeds 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, though that is a regional measurement rather than the global metric the Paris Agreement targets.

Record heat events have punctuated this trend. In February 2020, a station near the northern tip hit 18.6°C, the highest temperature ever recorded on the Antarctic mainland. That same summer, the George VI Ice Shelf logged a 32-year record for surface melting and meltwater pond formation. The years 2022 through 2024 produced the three lowest sea ice extents in the history of satellite observation, and in 2022 the drop was severe enough to cause widespread breeding failures in emperor penguin colonies. Chicks need stable sea ice to survive their first months; that year, the ice simply wasn’t there.

Adelie penguin
An Adelie penguin photographed by Prof Bethan Davies. Adelie penguins are highly dependent on sea ice coverage and a healthy population of krill, both of which are placed at risk by the climate crisis; in the western Antarctic Peninsula they have been partially replaced by the gentoo penguin, which is less dependent on ice and has a slightly more adaptable diet. (Credit: Prof Bethan Davies)

What Three Warming Scenarios Mean for Antarctica’s Ice Shelves

Under the lowest emissions path, limiting warming to about 1.8°C by 2100, sea ice would decline slightly, ice shelves would thin but likely hold together, and the annual number of days above freezing would increase by only about 1.5. Manageable, if not painless.

The middle scenario, which most closely matches where current policies are headed, is considerably worse. Ocean warming intensifies, warm water pushes more persistently onto the continental shelf, and sea ice drops by more than 13% in winter. Rainfall increasingly replaces snowfall, posing challenges for infrastructure not designed for wet conditions.

Under the worst-case scenario, the Peninsula changes dramatically. Days above freezing nearly triple, from about 19.7 per year today to nearly 48 by century’s end. Sea ice declines by nearly 20% in winter. Surface melt surges, draining the layer of compressed snow, called firn, that currently absorbs meltwater like a sponge. Once that layer is gone, water pools on impermeable ice and wedges into cracks, a process called hydrofracture that can cause shelves to disintegrate with startling speed.

Larsen C and Wilkins are assessed as likely to collapse by 2100 under this highest emissions scenario. George VI Ice Shelf, further south and more resistant to cracking because of how its ice flows, could still give way by 2300. Its loss alone would sharply raise the Peninsula’s contribution to global sea levels, which under the worst case could reach roughly 4.6 inches by 2300, though estimates carry wide uncertainty and reflect the Peninsula’s contribution only, on top of rise from Greenland and the rest of Antarctica.

re-exposed mosses
Recently re-exposed mosses, photographed in 2024 by Prof Peter Convey. These mosses had been covered by ice for around a thousand years. (Credit: Prof Peter Convey)

Ice Shelf Loss Would Reshape the Antarctic Food Web

Krill, the small crustaceans at the base of the Antarctic food web, depend on winter sea ice as a nursery for their young. Under higher warming scenarios, their range is projected to contract southward, squeezed between warming water and the continent itself. That contraction ripples up the food chain to the whales, seals, and penguins that rely on krill as a primary food source.

Meanwhile, the same warming that opens new ice-free ground for native mosses and lichens also strips away the barriers that have kept invasive species out for millennia. Stronger storms and more ship traffic raise the odds that outside organisms will gain a foothold in an ecosystem that has never had to compete with them.

Limiting warming to close to 1.5°C, the study concludes, would result in comparatively modest changes and greater resilience for the Peninsula. Its ice shelves would likely remain intact, and its wildlife would face pressure but fewer extreme disruptions. That outcome remains physically possible. Whether it is politically achievable is a question this decade will answer.


Paper Notes

Limitations

Projecting future ice loss from the Antarctic Peninsula carries significant uncertainty. Continent-wide models struggle with the region’s sharp mountain topography and narrow glacier valleys, requiring higher resolution than most current tools can provide. Near-term projections look similar across all emissions scenarios, with meaningful differences between pathways only emerging clearly after 2100, meaning the urgency of cutting emissions now is tied to long-term outcomes rather than changes visible within this century. Recent record sea ice lows have exposed further gaps in what models can reliably capture. Ecosystem projections carry additional uncertainty, as species respond differently to warming and interactions among multiple stressors are difficult to model with confidence.

Funding and Disclosures

Financial support was provided by the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office Polar Regions Department, the EU Horizon 2020 program (grant 101003590), the US National Science Foundation (awards 1841607, 2213702, and PHY-2309135), NASA’s Cryospheric Science Program (grant 80NSSC22K0383), the UK Research and Innovation Future Leaders Fellowship (MR/W011816/1), NERC core funding to the British Antarctic Survey, and the Antarctic Wildlife Fund. One author, Martin Siegert, was a member of the Frontiers editorial board at the time of submission, though the authors state this had no impact on peer review. No other conflicts of interest were declared. Generative AI was not used in the creation of the manuscript.

Publication Details

Authors: Bethan J. Davies, Angus Atkinson, Alison F. Banwell, Mark Brandon, Thomas Caton Harrison, Peter Convey, Jan De Rydt, Klaus Dodds, Rod Downie, Tamsin L. Edwards, Ella Gilbert, Bryn Hubbard, Kevin A. Hughes, Gareth J. Marshall, Andrew Orr, Joeri Rogelj, Hélène Seroussi, Martin Siegert, Julienne Stroeve, and Jane Rumble. | Journal: Frontiers in Environmental Science | Title: “The Antarctic Peninsula under present day climate and future low, medium-high and very high emissions scenarios” | Published: February 20, 2026 | DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2025.1730203

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment