Woman working at night

(Credit: Photo by Flotsam on Shutterstock)

In a Nutshell

  • Women who preferred late nights had higher body fat and worse blood sugar markers than those who went to bed earlier.
  • Evening types ate far less in the morning and much more after 8 p.m., a pattern tied to higher body fat and more belly fat.
  • Evening types also took in fewer key vitamins and minerals, pointing to diets that were both poorly timed and less nourishing.

There’s something quietly revealing about when a person chooses to go to bed. A new study finds that women who naturally drift toward late nights tend to carry more body fat, eat less nutritious food, and show more worrying numbers in their blood work. One factor the researchers pointed to was meal timing, not only the amount eaten.

Researchers studying 287 healthy European and Pacific New Zealand women aged 18 to 45 found that those who identified as “evening types,” people whose bodies naturally pull toward late nights and late mornings, had higher body fat and stored more of it around the belly than around the hips and thighs. Evening types also weighed more, showed poorer blood sugar markers, and had less favorable levels of certain blood fats, particularly triglycerides and HDL cholesterol. What separated them most clearly was meal timing.

Published in the journal Frontiers in Nutrition, the study adds to a growing scientific conversation about “chrono-nutrition,” the idea that the body’s internal clock shapes not only sleep but also how it handles food, fat, and sugar across the day.

Man watching TV on the couch at night eating pizza
Night owls often have less healthy lifestyles. (© ABCreative – stock.adobe.com)

What a Sleep Preference Can Say About Health

Every person has a natural preference for when to sleep and wake. Scientists call this a “chronotype.” Morning types wake early and feel sharp before noon. Evening types struggle to fall asleep until late and hit their stride long after sunrise.

In this study, just over half of the women fell into the intermediate category, about a third were evening types, and only about 12% were morning types. Because the morning group was so small, researchers combined the morning and intermediate groups for most comparisons and compared them with the evening groups.

Differences between the two groups were notable. Evening types had a median body mass index, a common measure of weight relative to height, of 31.4, compared with 26.1 for the morning-intermediate group. Their body fat percentage was higher, and so was a measure comparing belly fat with fat stored in the hips and thighs. A higher belly reading signals greater health risk. Evening types averaged 0.98 on that measure, against 0.87 for the morning-intermediate group.

Night Owls and Body Fat: When They Eat, Not Only How Much

Total food intake was close between the groups. Evening types took in slightly more energy overall, a difference of roughly 50 calories a day, and their protein, fat, and carbohydrate proportions looked similar to everyone else’s. So total intake differed relatively little next to the timing gap. Timing is where the groups pulled apart.

Researchers tracked what participants ate across four windows of the day. Morning and intermediate types front-loaded their eating, taking in more energy, protein, fat, and carbohydrate before 10 a.m. Evening types ate very little in the morning and much more after 8 p.m.

Evening types took in about 9% of their daily calories before 10 a.m., compared with about 15% for the morning-intermediate group. After 8 p.m., evening types ate about 22.6% of their daily calories, more than double what they had in the morning. The morning-intermediate group ate about 11% of their calories after 8 p.m.

Research points to the body handling food better earlier in the day than late at night. Insulin, the hormone that helps the body turn sugar into fuel, works best in the morning, and metabolism shifts at night toward storing rather than burning. Studies have linked late-night eating to less favorable metabolic outcomes, though the exact mechanisms remain under investigation. For evening types eating large meals close to bedtime, when those calories land may matter as much as the calories themselves.

Infographic comparing morning/intermediate and evening chronotypes, showing that women who ate more of their calories after 8 p.m. tended to have higher body fat and less favorable metabolic markers than those who ate earlier.
Infographic by StudyFinds

What the Blood Work Showed

Blood tests told a consistent story. Evening types had higher triglycerides, a blood fat tied to heart disease risk, along with higher insulin and higher HbA1c, a marker doctors use to gauge long-term blood sugar control and screen for diabetes risk. Their leptin, a hormone linked to fullness, also ran higher.

Evening types had lower HDL cholesterol, the kind often called “good” cholesterol, and lower ghrelin, a hunger signal. The link tracked steadily: the later a woman’s natural sleep midpoint, the more her results leaned in an unfavorable direction. Among women who already had more body fat, especially around the belly, the late-night eating pattern aligned even more strongly with those outcomes.

Night Owls and Nutrition: Not Only When, but What

Beyond timing, evening types ate less nourishing food overall. Compared with the morning and intermediate groups, they took in less fiber, folate, vitamins A and E, calcium, magnesium, potassium, iodine, and riboflavin, a B vitamin. That points to diets built more on processed, calorie-dense foods than on fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and dairy, consistent with a less nutrient-dense pattern other studies have found in people who stay up late.

Researchers built the findings on five-day food records that participants kept at home across weekdays and weekends, with a dietitian reviewing each one for accuracy. Body fat was measured with a specialized X-ray scan considered more precise than height-and-weight math, and blood was drawn after an overnight fast of at least 10 hours.

One caveat matters here. Most evening types in the study were of Pacific ethnicity, while the morning and intermediate types were mostly New Zealand European. Researchers adjusted for ethnicity and noted that Pacific women in New Zealand have documented differences in diet and body composition, so the overlap makes it hard to fully separate one influence from the other. They call for future work in more diverse groups.

This study cannot prove that being a night owl causes these health problems; it can only show that the two travel together. It also looked only at women aged 18 to 45, so the results may not carry over to men or older adults. Researchers lacked a direct measure of each person’s internal body clock, and self-reported food records always carry some risk of error, more so among people with irregular eating habits.

Even so, the findings hold together across body fat, belly fat, blood sugar markers, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and vitamin intake. The body keeps a rhythm, and eating out of step with it appears to leave marks that show up in the numbers. For the roughly one in three women here who leaned toward late nights, that mismatch tracked with real differences in body and blood, a reminder that both what and when a person eats may shape health, even if which one drives the other stays an open question.

Disclaimer: This article summarizes a single observational study for general information and is not medical advice. The research shows an association between sleep and eating patterns and health markers, not that one causes the other. It included only healthy women aged 18 to 45, so the results may not apply to everyone. Anyone with questions about diet, weight, or metabolic health should consult a qualified healthcare professional.


Paper Notes

Study Limitations

Because the study was cross-sectional, capturing data at a single point rather than following women over years, researchers cannot say whether chronotype drives poor health outcomes or whether other factors shape both. The sample included only healthy women aged 18 to 45, which limits how far the results extend to men, older adults, or people with existing conditions. Researchers also lacked an internal body-clock marker, so meal timing was judged against the external clock rather than each woman’s biological rhythm. Chronotype and ethnicity overlapped heavily, since Pacific women made up most of the evening-type group, and ethnicity affects diet, body composition, and metabolic health through cultural, social, and biological factors. Self-reported food records carry risks of memory and portion-size error, possibly greater among evening types given their less structured eating. The small number of morning types forced researchers to merge them with the intermediate group, which limited separate analysis of that group. Menstrual cycle effects on appetite were not controlled, and 17 night-shift workers were excluded from the final analysis.

Funding and Disclosures

Financial support was provided by a Health Research Council of New Zealand grant (Reference ID 15/273). A Massey University scholarship supported the lead doctoral researcher from 2019 to 2022. The authors reported no commercial or financial relationships that could pose a conflict of interest, and stated that generative AI was not used to create the manuscript.

Publication Details

Paper Title: Chronotype and associations with dietary intake, meal timing, body composition, and metabolic biomarkers

Authors: Carlien van der Merwe, Marilize Richter-Cottle, Bernhard H. Breier, Jeroen Douwes, Mirjam Münch, and Rozanne Kruger

Institutional Affiliations: School of Sport, Exercise and Nutrition, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand; Centre of Excellence for Nutrition, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa; Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand; Centre for Chronobiology, Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel; Research Cluster Molecular and Cognitive Neurosciences; Department for Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; School of Allied Health, Sport and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia

Journal: Frontiers in Nutrition, Volume 13

Published: July 7, 2026

DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2026.1862060

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment