An artist’s depiction of the brain on psychedelics

(Bruce Rolff/Shutterstock)

In A Nutshell

  • Researchers used a light-based brain imaging technique in mice to watch, in real time, what happens in the brain during a psychedelic experience and found a specific electrical rhythm that the drugs dramatically amplify.
  • When a psychedelic was given, rhythmic brain waves in the visual processing area fired nearly twice as often on their own, and grew significantly stronger and longer-lasting when triggered by something the mice actually saw.
  • The brain’s memory system got pulled into the experience too, syncing up with the visual area in a way that suggests the brain starts flooding perception with internally stored images rather than registering what’s really in front of it.
  • The finding has potential relevance for understanding hallucinations in psychosis and Parkinson’s disease, and for ongoing clinical research into psychedelic-assisted therapy for depression and PTSD.

Something specific happens inside the brain when a psychedelic drug makes someone see things that aren’t there. A ripple of electrical activity, pulsing roughly five times per second, surges through the part of the brain that processes vision and starts pulling a memory-linked region along with it. A study published in Communications Biology captured that process in real time and argues it may be the clearest window yet into how these drugs make the brain conjure images that don’t exist.

Researchers at Ruhr University Bochum in Germany, working with colleagues in Singapore and Hong Kong, used an advanced light-based brain imaging technique to watch electrical waves sweep across the entire surface of the brain in awake mice. After giving the animals a psychedelic compound, the same type that makes psilocybin and LSD work, they saw a dramatic change in specific rhythmic brain waves. Those waves became more frequent on their own, and when triggered by something the mice were shown, they grew significantly stronger and lasted much longer. Two brain regions tied to vision and memory began firing in sync in a way that hadn’t been seen before the drug was given.

What the data suggest is something neuroscientists have long suspected but never quite pinned down: under psychedelics, the brain’s own internal signals start drowning out real information coming in through the eyes. What gets registered as “seen” shifts away from the actual world and toward an amplified broadcast from within. That shift, the researchers argue, may be what a hallucination actually is at its most basic biological level.

What a Psychedelic Does to the Brain’s Vision System

The brain is never just a passive receiver of what the eyes send it. At every moment, the visual system is doing two things at once: taking in real-time information from the world and comparing it against a running set of predictions based on memory and experience. Under normal conditions, those two streams stay roughly balanced.

Psychedelics appear to tip that balance at a very specific point. The compounds in this study latch onto a particular docking site on brain cells, one that is especially dense in the brain’s outer layer, which handles most of our conscious thinking and perception. Once activated, that docking site causes the brain’s visual processing area to begin generating rhythmic electrical pulses at around five cycles per second, a pattern associated with memory retrieval, attention, and recognizing familiar things.

After the psychedelic was given, those pulses started firing nearly twice as often on their own, even when the mice weren’t looking at anything specific. More telling, when a visual image was actually shown to the mice, the brain’s electrical response became significantly stronger and lasted far longer than it had before the drug. The drug didn’t simply make the brain busier overall. It specifically intensified and prolonged the brain’s reaction to things seen in the outside world.

Psilocybin mushrooms in front of a pill bottle
Mice were given the same compound that makes psilocybin and LSD work. (Photo by Deep Roots on Shutterstock)

The Memory Connection

What made this study technically possible was the imaging tool the team used. Rather than sticking electrodes into the brain, they relied on specially engineered proteins that produce flashes of light in sync with electrical activity. Expressed in specific brain cells, these proteins allowed the researchers to watch the entire brain surface light up in real time, across both sides simultaneously, at a level of detail that older recording methods couldn’t provide.

That wide view turned up something the researchers hadn’t necessarily expected. The rhythmic waves didn’t stay confined to the visual processing area. They also showed up in a separate region closer to the middle of the brain, one that acts as a relay station between the memory system and the visual system. Activity in that second region followed the visual area by about 18 milliseconds, consistent with a signal traveling as a wave from one area to the other. Before the drug, the two regions were far less synchronized with each other. After, they moved together. When the team checked other brain areas involved in touch and movement, nothing comparable appeared.

Why Hallucinations Feel So Real

That memory-linked relay region is particularly interesting because of what it does. It takes stored experiences, expectations, and associations and feeds them back into the visual system, essentially helping the brain interpret what it’s seeing based on what it already knows. Under normal conditions, that’s a useful feature. Under psychedelics, it may become something else entirely.

When the visual system’s rhythmic activity is amplified by the drug, that memory relay appears to pump increasing amounts of internally stored content back into what the brain perceives as real. The eyes are still working. But what they’re sending gets progressively overrun by the brain’s own imagination and memory. The researchers describe this as “a strengthening of top-down control of perception” and link it directly to how visual hallucinations form.

That idea reaches beyond the context of drug experiences. People with psychosis and Parkinson’s disease also experience visual hallucinations. Research into psychosis has shown those hallucinations tend to occur when the brain’s visual processing area is less responsive to real-world input, leaving internally generated signals to dominate. A psychedelic may create a similar situation through a different mechanism, not by quieting external input, but by so powerfully amplifying the internal response that the two can no longer stay in balance.

The research team also checked whether the results could be explained by something more mundane. Prior studies had shown that one of the drugs used doesn’t measurably change pupil size or how active mice are behaviorally. The fact that two chemically distinct compounds produced the same brain pattern made a simple stress reaction from the injection an unlikely explanation.

Illustration of an individual having a psychedelic experience
Psychedelic hallucinations may stem from a brain rhythm that causes internal memories and associations to overpower sight. (© SergeyKatyshkin – stock.adobe.com)

What It Could Mean for Treatment

Psychedelic-assisted therapy for depression and post-traumatic stress disorder is currently being studied in clinical trials around the world, and researchers are still working to understand exactly how these drugs help and whether the hallucinatory experience itself is part of the therapeutic process. A clear, repeatable brain signal tied to the psychedelic state could give future human studies something concrete to measure, potentially helping connect what happens in the brain to what happens in the therapy room.

Hallucinations have always been among the hardest things in brain science to study, because they exist only inside the experience of the person having them. What this research offers is a measurable signal that tracked predictably, in specific brain regions, consistently across the team’s experiments. That’s a starting point the field hasn’t had before.


Disclaimer: This study was conducted in mice, not humans. Its findings should not be interpreted as a clinical recommendation regarding psychedelic use for any condition. Psychedelic compounds remain controlled substances in most jurisdictions. Researchers continue to study their potential therapeutic applications in supervised clinical settings.


Paper Notes

Limitations

This study was conducted entirely in mice, not humans, and involved only five animals, four male and one female. While mice are widely used in brain research, their brains differ from human brains in important ways, and it isn’t yet known whether the same rhythmic patterns occur in people during psychedelic experiences or produce similar effects. The mice were also passively watching a moving image on a screen rather than doing any active task, so the researchers couldn’t confirm whether the animals were consistently paying attention throughout. The team acknowledged they couldn’t completely rule out that some of the brain wave activity reflected the mice tuning out a repetitive stimulus, though nothing in the data consistently pointed that way. Most critically, because it’s impossible to ask an animal what it’s experiencing, the link between these brain rhythms and actual hallucinations is a well-supported inference rather than a proven fact.

Funding and Disclosures

This research was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) grants (Project ID 122679504 – SFB 874; JA 945/5-1; Project number 492434978 – GRK 2862/1), the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research through an ERA-Net Neuron “Horizon 2020” grant (01EW2104B), the US National Institutes of Health BRAIN Initiative Grant (5U01NS099573), the Lee Kuan Yew Postdoctoral Fellowship at Nanyang Technological University Singapore (022506-00001), and an Open Fund Young Individual Research Grant (MOH-001720) from Singapore’s National Medical Research Council. The authors declared no competing interests.

Publication Details

Authors: Callum M. White, Zohre Azimi, Robert Staadt, Chenchen Song, Thomas Knöpfel, and Dirk Jancke. White, Azimi, and Staadt contributed equally as co-first authors; Knöpfel and Jancke jointly supervised the work. Institutional affiliations include the Optical Imaging Group, Institut für Neuroinformatik, Ruhr University Bochum (Germany); Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University (Singapore); and the JC STEM Laboratory for Neuronal Circuit Dynamics, Hong Kong Baptist University (Hong Kong SAR, China). | Journal: Communications Biology, a Nature Portfolio journal, Volume 9, Article 216 (2026). | Paper Title: “Psychedelic 5-HT2A agonist increases spontaneous and evoked 5-Hz oscillations in visual and retrosplenial cortex” | DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-09492-9 | Received: July 24, 2025. Accepted: December 23, 2025. Published online: January 12, 2026. Peer review was handled by Primary Handling Editor Jasmine Pan; reviewer Hio-Been Han is acknowledged by name in the published peer review file.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment