Rose bush

(© yaroshenko - stock.adobe.com)

In a nutshell

  • Rose petals get their pointed shapes from a unique geometric conflict—not uneven growth rates.
  • The shape emerges due to “Mainardi-Codazzi-Peterson incompatibility,” a built-in mechanical mismatch.
  • This discovery could inspire shape-shifting materials in engineering and design.

JERUSALEM — Ever notice how rose petals curl at the edges with those elegant pointed tips? For centuries, artists have celebrated these distinctive shapes in paintings and poetry, but the science behind them remained elusive—until now.

New research published in Science has unlocked the mystery, revealing that roses shape themselves through a mathematical mismatch that happens during growth. Unlike other flowers that get their shapes from varying growth rates, roses form their characteristic points because of a phenomenon called “Mainardi-Codazzi-Peterson incompatibility”—basically, a built-in geometric conflict.

The research team from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem studied Red Baccara roses and about 100 petals from various rose species. They noticed a clear pattern: young petals near a flower’s center have smooth edges, while older petals develop polygon-like shapes with distinct points.

To figure out why this happens, they cut narrow strips from different areas of the petals. Strips cut along the edge stayed flat, but strips cut from center to edge curved downward—revealing different growth patterns in different directions.

This led to a breakthrough discovery: rose petals grow with curvature only in the radial direction (from center to edge), not around the circular edge. As growth continues, this mismatch creates what engineers call “geometric frustration”—the material physically cannot exist in its preferred state without distorting.

“Their distinctive shape emerges from a different type of geometric incompatibility,” the researchers write in the paper, referring to this specific mathematical conflict.

Red roses on a bush
Scientists finally know why rose petals curl in such a perfectly beautiful manner.(© K.Jagielski – stock.adobe.com)

Testing their theory, the scientists created simplified models of disc-shaped petals through computer simulations and physical experiments using a biodegradable plastic. By programming these models with the same growth patterns seen in real roses, they reproduced the transformation from smooth edges to pointed tips.

The team confirmed their findings with a clever experiment: they gently moved a newly formed point on a young petal to a different spot along the edge, then let the flower keep growing. The original location grew normally with a rounded edge, while the new location developed a concave edge—proving that the point itself changes how tissue grows.

This discovery goes beyond explaining pretty flowers. It reveals a mechanism that could transform manufacturing and engineering, where the same principles might help create materials that automatically form specific shapes without external manipulation.

Traditional methods for creating complex curves in thin materials require outside forces, but this study shows how well-designed growth patterns can spontaneously create sophisticated shapes. From architecture to medical devices, the principles behind rose petal formation might someday help engineers create structures that automatically fold into useful forms.

The research illuminates how a simple growth pattern creates a feedback loop between shape and biology: the symmetrical growth causes geometric incompatibility, creating points and concentrating stress, which then redirects subsequent growth—nature’s elegant solution to a mathematical problem.

Paper Summary

Methodology

The researchers studied both natural rose petals and created simplified model systems to understand the geometric mechanisms at work. For natural roses, they collected and analyzed about 100 different petals from various rose species, cutting narrow strips along selected directions to reveal the natural curvature patterns. They also measured the radial curvature at different stages of growth. For the simplified models, they created both computer simulations and physical experiments using polylactide (PLA) discs programmed with specific reference geometries. These models allowed them to systematically vary parameters like thickness, radius, and curvature to identify the conditions that lead to different morphologies. They also developed mathematical models describing the energy minimization that determines the final shapes.

Results

The study found that rose petals undergo a transition from smooth sectors with uniform curvature in younger petals to polygonal shapes with distinct cusps in mature petals. This transformation isn’t driven by the commonly known Gauss incompatibility (where different growth rates cause buckling), but rather by Mainardi-Codazzi-Peterson (MCP) incompatibility, which occurs when translating the normal vector along different paths results in different orientations. The researchers identified distinct morphological regimes based on two dimensionless parameters – normalized curvature and thickness – and found that the transition between regimes follows a specific scaling law. They also discovered that as petals mature, stress focusing at the cusps influences subsequent tissue growth, creating a feedback loop between mechanics and biology.

Limitations

While the study provides a compelling physical model for rose petal morphology, it uses simplified disc geometries rather than the full complexity of actual petal shapes. The researchers also note that their model primarily addresses the mechanics of cusp formation but doesn’t fully explore the biological growth regulation mechanisms that might be involved. Additionally, while they studied around 100 petals, these were mainly from cultivated rose varieties, which might have different properties than wild roses due to selective breeding for aesthetic characteristics.

Funding and Disclosures

The research was funded by the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities and Council for Higher Education Excellence Fellowship Program for International Postdoctoral Researchers, the United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (grant 2020739), and the Israel Science Foundation (grants 2437/20 and 1441/19). The authors declared no competing interests.

Publication Information

The paper titled “Geometrically frustrated rose petals” was authored by Yafei Zhang, Omri Y. Cohen, Michael Moshe, and Eran Sharon from the Racah Institute of Physics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel. It was published in Science on May 1, 2025, and accepted on February 25, 2025, after being submitted on September 10, 2024.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment