octopus

Photo by Dear Sunflower on Unsplash

Giant Octopuses May Have Been Among the Smartest Predators in Dinosaur-Age Seas

In A Nutshell

  • Fossil jaws from Japan and Canada reveal the earliest known octopuses, ancient finned giants that may have reached up to 61 feet long roughly 100 to 72 million years ago.
  • Wear patterns on the jaws suggest these creatures were powerful hunters that crushed hard-shelled prey, with damage exceeding what researchers see even in modern shell-crushing species.
  • Uneven wear on opposite jaw edges points to “handedness,” a behavioral trait linked in living animals to advanced brain development.
  • Size estimates are based on scaling from modern relatives, not complete fossils, so the figures carry significant uncertainty but still place these octopuses among the largest animals in Cretaceous oceans.

For centuries, sailors whispered about the Kraken, a massive tentacled beast capable of dragging ships beneath the waves. Later generations chalked those tales up to overactive imaginations, with the supposed monster reaching roughly 33 to 40 feet. But a new fossil discovery points to something even bigger: octopuses possibly up to about 61 feet long that appear to have been top predators in oceans shared with giant marine reptiles roughly 100 to 72 million years ago.

Published in Science, an international team of researchers has identified the earliest known octopuses from rocks in Japan and Canada’s Vancouver Island. Based on exceptionally well-preserved fossilized jaws and telltale wear on those jaws, these ancient finned octopuses appear to have been powerful shell-crushers that actively hunted hard-bodied prey. Their calculated body size rivals marine reptiles often cast as the dominant predators of those seas, including bus-length mosasaurs and long-necked plesiosaurs. Those size estimates are based on scaling relationships observed in modern relatives rather than intact ancient specimens, meaning they represent informed reconstructions, not precise measurements.

Wear patterns on the jaws aren’t even on both sides. One side is consistently more ground down than the other, a feature researchers link to a preference for using one side of the body, similar to being right- or left-handed. Researchers suggest these ancient giants may have been not just enormous and powerful, but genuinely smart, though they caution that inferring cognitive ability from jaw wear alone has inherent limits.

How Fossil Octopus Jaws Survived Millions of Years

Octopuses are notoriously difficult to find in the fossil record. Their soft bodies decay quickly and almost never leave a trace in stone. But their jaws, hard beak-like structures made of a tough biological material called chitin, can survive millions of years under the right conditions. Researchers studied 27 fossil jaws. Fifteen had been previously reported from rocks in Japan and Vancouver Island. Twelve were newly discovered using “digital fossil-mining,” which combines high-resolution grinding, shaving rock away in ultra-thin layers and photographing each slice, with an AI model that scans massive image sets to spot hidden fossils.

All 27 specimens came from calm, deep-water deposits far from shore, meaning the heavy damage on the jaws wasn’t caused by tumbling along the ocean floor but by the animals themselves, by the repeated, forceful crunching of hard prey. Because all specimens came from a specific depositional setting, the findings offer a snapshot rather than a complete picture of their range.

kraken
A sketch of the giant octopus. (Image: Yohei Utsuki, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Hokkaido University)

Giant Octopus Fossils Reveal Record-Breaking Predators

Researchers identified two species: N. jeletzkyi and N. haggarti. Both belong to the finned octopuses, a subgroup that today lives mostly in the deep sea. Modern finned octopuses are relatively modest in size. Their ancestors from the age of dinosaurs were anything but.

By comparing fossil jaw size to the known relationship between jaw size and body size in living finned octopuses, the team calculated that N. jeletzkyi reached a total length of roughly 9 to 25 feet. The larger species, N. haggarti, reached an estimated 22 to roughly 61 feet. Because no complete soft-body fossils have been found, these calculations assume proportional relationships in living species apply to their ancient relatives, and the broad range reflects that uncertainty. At its maximum, N. haggarti would have been comparable to the largest known bony fish, shark-like predators, plesiosaurs, and mosasaurs of its era.

Growth marks on the fossil jaws, somewhat like tree rings, revealed that N. haggarti grew both larger and faster than N. jeletzkyi. Since N. haggarti appears in younger rock layers, this suggests these octopuses were getting more gigantic over time, becoming increasingly dominant toward the end of the dinosaur era.

Digital fossil-mining of an octopus jaw fossil that enabled precise visualization of its fine structures by using zero-shot learning AI. (Video: Shin Ikegami, Kanta Sugiura, Yasuhiro Iba, Jörg Mutterlose, Yusuke Takeda, Mehmet Oguz Derin, Aya Kubota, Kazuki Tainaka, Harufumi Nishida)

Ancient Jaw Wear Reveals Giant Octopus Diet and Intelligence

Both species show unmistakable signs of heavy use on their largest jaws: originally sharp tips ground to blunt nubs, rounded and chipped edges, and outer surfaces polished smooth where fine natural grooves have been worn away. Scratches crisscross those polished surfaces, and chips and cracks suggest moments when the jaw bit down on something so hard it nearly fractured.

In modern octopuses and cuttlefishes, this type of wear is a hallmark of animals that regularly crush hard-shelled prey like crabs and clams. Wear on these ancient jaws exceeded what researchers typically see even in modern shell-crushers, with lost jaw material amounting to about 10 percent of total jaw length. Because no stomach contents have been found, the top-predator interpretation rests on jaw wear and body size calculations rather than direct observation.

Wear showed up only on adult jaws, not on juveniles, and was absent from squid jaws found in the same rock layers. In both species, the right edge was more worn than the left. Researchers interpret this as evidence of “handedness,” a behavioral one-sidedness closely linked in modern brain science to a highly developed brain with specialized regions, raising the possibility that the roots of octopus intelligence run extremely deep in evolutionary time.

Although they lived far too early to inspire the Kraken legend, these animals show that something strikingly kraken-like really did prowl those seas, armed with powerful jaws and a level of intelligence no one expected to find 100 million years in the past.


Paper Notes

Limitations

Body size estimates are based on scaling relationships between jaw size and body size observed in modern finned octopuses. Because no complete soft-body fossils of Nanaimoteuthis have been found, these calculations rely on the assumption that proportional relationships in living species apply to their ancient relatives. For N. haggarti, total length spans from roughly 22 to 61 feet, reflecting significant uncertainty. Direct evidence of specific prey, such as stomach contents, has not been found. Interpretation of these octopuses as top predators rests on jaw wear evidence and body size calculations rather than direct observation. All specimens came from calm deep-water shelf deposits, so the findings may not represent the full ecological range of these animals.

Funding and Disclosures

This work was supported by multiple grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (grants 22J13936, 23K17274, 19H02010, 22H02937, 23H02544, 25K22459, and 26K00821), the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (grant JX-PSPC-540452), and The Canon Foundation (2019). Authors declare no competing interests.

Publication Details

Title: “Earliest octopuses were giant top predators in Cretaceous oceans” | Authors: Shin Ikegami, Jörg Mutterlose, Kanta Sugiura, Yusuke Takeda, Mehmet Oguz Derin, Aya Kubota, Kazuki Tainaka, Takahiro Harada, Harufumi Nishida, and Yasuhiro Iba | Journal: Science, Volume 392, Issue 6796, published April 23, 2026 | DOI: 10.1126/science.aea6285 | Institutions: Hokkaido University (Japan), Ruhr University Bochum (Germany), Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute, Morgenrot Inc. (Tokyo), Brain Research Institute at Niigata University, Osaka Metropolitan University, and Chuo University (Tokyo). Corresponding author: Yasuhiro Iba. Shin Ikegami and Yasuhiro Iba contributed equally to the work.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply