
UTIs typically lead to frequent urges to pee, or a burning sensation while urinating. (Photo by CGN089 on Shutterstock)
Study Links E. Coli In Poultry Products To 1 in 5 Bladder Infections
In A Nutshell
- Nearly 1 in 5 UTIs in Southern California came from E. coli strains originating in food animals, with turkey (82% contaminated) and chicken (58%) products posing the highest risk.
- Women had more than twice the rate of food-animal UTIs compared to men (20% vs. 8.5%), while people in high-poverty neighborhoods faced 60% higher risk than those in affluent areas.
- The good news: Food-animal E. coli showed lower antibiotic resistance than human-adapted strains, suggesting livestock antibiotic restrictions may be working.
- Protect yourself by washing hands thoroughly after handling raw poultry, preventing cross-contamination in your kitchen, and ensuring meat reaches safe cooking temperatures.
Most people know to wash their hands after handling raw meat. The driving concern behind that behavior, however, is usually food poisoning. Few worry about contracting a bladder infection while preparing a bite to eat, but noteworthy research suggests UTIs contracted in the kitchen may be a much more ubiquitous health risk than commonly known.
A study of nearly 6,000 bacterial samples from Southern California reveals an unexpected connection: approximately 18% of urinary tract infections stem from E. coli strains originating in livestock raised for meat, with poultry products emerging as a major reservoir. Taken together, the results suggest that meat production and handling may play a larger role in UTIs than many people realize.
Between 2017 and 2021, researchers from George Washington University and Kaiser Permanente Southern California analyzed E. coli isolates from both retail meat and UTI patients across eight counties. Their testing found that turkey products showed 82% E. coli contamination rates, followed by chicken at 58%, pork at 54%, and beef at 47%.
E. coli is responsible for approximately 8 million urinary tract infections annually in the United States. In this Southern California health system, nearly one in five UTIs appeared to involve strains originating in livestock raised for meat. If similar patterns hold elsewhere, meat products could represent an important, and partly preventable, source of bladder infections.
“Recognizing this route of exposure presents new opportunities for reducing the heavy burden of UTIs,” the research team wrote in their study published in mBio.

How Scientists Traced UTIs Back to Poultry
The challenge facing researchers was daunting. How do you show that a bladder infection is tied to meat from the grocery store rather than the countless other ways people encounter E. coli?
The research team used genetic analysis, examining 17 specific mobile genetic elements alongside bacterial DNA patterns to trace infection sources. These genetic markers work as biological fingerprints that distinguish E. coli associated with livestock from strains that mainly circulate in human populations.
What emerged was a detective story written in bacterial DNA. Some poultry-associated E. coli strains showed a disproportionate ability to cause UTIs, meaning they caused more infections than their prevalence in meat would predict. ST69 emerged as the most prevalent among livestock-origin strains causing UTIs. Other strains (ST10, ST58, and ST101), which belong to E. coli lineages usually considered less virulent, showed enhanced disease-causing potential, carrying more virulence genes than similar strains.
Scientists identified 196 distinct bacterial strains among infections traced to livestock. Only 13% of these strains appeared in livestock-origin infections, human-origin infections, and meat samples, suggesting that most meat-related strains have distinct genetic profiles from those circulating more widely in human populations.
Who Faces the Greatest Risk
The infection patterns revealed troubling health disparities. Women bear a higher burden of meat-related UTIs compared to men, with nearly 20% of female UTI cases linked to livestock sources versus just 8.5% in males. Among infected men, those with livestock-origin strains were notably older (median age 73 versus 65 years).
Income also mattered. People living in high-poverty neighborhoods faced a 60% increased risk compared to those in affluent areas. The infection rate climbed to 21.5% in high-poverty communities, compared to 16.6% in wealthier neighborhoods, even after researchers adjusted for age, sex, and ethnicity.
Meat contamination varied by neighborhood wealth as well, with a 12% increase in bacterial presence for each 10% rise in the regional poverty rate. Value-pack meat products showed higher contamination rates, potentially contributing to disparities in infection risk.
Good News on Antibiotic Resistance
Livestock-origin E. coli strains showed lower resistance to antibiotics commonly used to treat UTIs, including sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim, compared with human-adapted strains. Livestock-origin UTI strains also showed less multidrug resistance overall, with resistance patterns closer to bacteria from meat products than to human-adapted strains.

This pattern may reflect reduced antibiotic use in livestock following long-running FDA efforts to limit medically important antimicrobials in agriculture. California Senate Bill 27, which restricted livestock antibiotic use, may also have contributed to these lower resistance rates. Both ampicillin and tetracycline resistance were lower in this 2017–2021 study compared to data from Arizona collected nearly a decade earlier.
How Poultry Bacteria Reach the Bladder
While the study couldn’t definitively trace transmission routes, cross-contamination during food preparation remains a likely pathway. Raw poultry juices can spread to kitchen surfaces, utensils, and hands, creating opportunities for bacteria to reach the urinary tract.
The bacteria don’t necessarily have to be ingested to cause problems; in addition to potential foodborne exposure, simple hand-to-body contact after touching contaminated meat or kitchen surfaces could introduce pathogens to the urinary tract.
Inadequate food handling becomes more likely in communities with limited access to clean water. Storage temperature failures at retail locations, particularly in resource-limited neighborhoods, can allow bacterial populations to expand before purchase.
Occupational exposure is another possible route. People who work in meat processing, grocery stores, or food service encounter raw poultry regularly, potentially increasing infection risk.
The study examined samples from all major grocery chains across eight Southern California counties, serving Kaiser Permanente’s 4.8 million members. Most UTI patients were female (88%) with a median age of 50 years, reflecting the region’s ethnic diversity: 37% Hispanic, 31% non-Hispanic white, with smaller percentages of Asian, Black, and other groups.
Practical Takeaways for Consumers
The research team argues for stricter measures to reduce harmful E. coli in retail meat, particularly poultry. Enhanced surveillance throughout the supply chain and tighter processing controls could lower the bacterial burden before products reach stores.
Until such changes occur, people at heightened risk should exercise extra caution. Immunocompromised individuals, older adults, and those with chronic conditions should pay particular attention when handling raw meat. Thorough handwashing after touching raw poultry, preventing cross-contamination with ready-to-eat foods, and ensuring proper cooking temperatures are essential.
Lower bacterial loads in poultry products would mean fewer opportunities for transmission, potentially preventing a substantial number of UTIs annually while also helping to narrow health gaps in economically disadvantaged communities.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and is not intended as medical advice. If you experience symptoms of a urinary tract infection, consult a healthcare professional for proper diagnosis and treatment.
Paper Notes
Study Limitations
The research has several limitations worth noting. The current version of the attribution model cannot distinguish between specific meat types, only between food-animal and human origins. The model was not developed using E. coli genomes from cattle or beef products, which may have resulted in underestimating cattle-origin contributions to human disease.
The study cannot differentiate between foodborne exposure and other transmission pathways. A small proportion of isolates may derive from recurring UTIs rather than new infections, potentially biasing results. The focus on community-acquired infections through outpatient visits means hospital and healthcare-acquired infections, which face different environmental pressures, were not included.
Since the study did not include strains from invasive infections like sepsis, it may have limitations in identifying zoonotic strains posing the greatest public health risk. However, given that most invasive E. coli infections begin in the urinary tract, the study likely captured the major strains capable of causing ascending infections.
Funding and Disclosures
The study received funding from the Wellcome Trust (grants 201866, 211493/Z/18/Z, 18-1030952970), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (5R01AI130066-05), and the Johns Hopkins Sherrilyn and Ken Fisher Center for Environmental Infectious Disease Discovery Program (010NAC2017). Kaiser Permanente Southern California provided additional internal funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
Publication Details
The study, titled “Zoonotic Escherichia coli and urinary tract infections in Southern California,” was authored by Maliha Aziz, Daniel E. Park, Vanessa Quinlivan, Evangelos A. Dimopoulos, Yashan Wang, Edward H. Sung, Annie L.S. Roberts, Ann Nyaboe, Meghan F. Davis, Joan A. Casey, Julio Diaz Caballero, Keeve E. Nachman, Harpreet S. Takhar, David M. Aanensen, Julian Parkhill, Sara Y. Tartof, Cindy M. Liu, and Lance B. Price, along with the KP & GWU ARES team.
The research appeared in mBio, published by the American Society for Microbiology, on October 23, 2025 (Volume 16, Issue 11). The DOI is 10.1128/mbio.01428-25. The study received approval from Kaiser Permanente IRB (protocol number 11284) with a waiver of consent. Sequencing and analytical activities were deemed non-human subjects research by the George Washington University IRB.
Between 2017 and 2021, researchers collected 23,483 E. coli isolates from UTI patients and 12,616 from retail meat samples across Southern California. They performed whole-genome sequencing on a representative subset of 5,728 isolates (2,349 clinical and 3,379 meat samples). The meat samples came from chicken (970 isolates), turkey (792), pork (837), and beef (780) products purchased in the same residential areas where clinical samples originated.
The research team employed a Bayesian latent class model trained with 17 host-associated genetic markers to infer the host origin of each isolate. This statistical-genomic approach is a complementary tool to traditional epidemiologic methods for source attribution. Genomic data from the study are available on NCBI under SRA accession number PRJEB31347.







