The Word Narcissism Close Up

Narcissism is defined as selfishness, involving a sense of entitlement, a lack of empathy, and a need for admiration, as characterizing a personality type. (© Hypnotik Photography - stock.adobe.com)

In A Nutshell

  • Young people who strongly believed their nation was secretly great reported higher stress over time, not relief.
  • Feeling stressed or depressed did not push people toward stronger national narcissism, which runs counter to a widely assumed pattern.
  • The link between national narcissism and stress looked the same across the status groups the researchers examined, pointing to a broad psychological pattern rather than one tied to specific life circumstances.

Some national pride goes beyond flying a flag or cheering at the Olympics. It runs on a quieter, more brittle conviction that one’s country is exceptional, perhaps even the greatest, and that the rest of the world stubbornly refuses to admit it. Psychologists have a name for that mindset: national narcissism.

While national narcissism appears to be a comfort for many of its adherents, according to a new study that tracked hundreds of young adults over time, holding it was linked to higher stress down the road.

Researchers long assumed the relationship ran in one direction. People who feel bad about themselves, the thinking went, grab onto an inflated sense of national pride like an emotional life raft, with stress, depression, and a bruised sense of self-worth pushing them toward grand beliefs about their nation. Research published in the Journal of Research in Personality complicates that story.

Rather than emotional pain feeding national narcissism, the data points the predictive arrow the other way, and the relief people might hope to get from the mindset does not seem to arrive, at least within the window the study covered.

That twist matters because so much public commentary treats wounded pride as the cause and grievance as the symptom. These findings flip the order, at least for young adults: the belief appears to come first, and the stress follows.

Inside the National Narcissism Study

A team based in the Czech Republic and Poland followed 688 Czech young adults between the ages of 18 and 30 across two survey rounds set roughly a year apart. Most participants were women, and the group ran the gamut from full-time students to working adults and people outside the workforce. Participants answered questions about their national pride, stress levels, depressive feelings, and personality, including a measure of how emotionally reactive they tend to be in general.

To gauge national narcissism, participants rated how strongly they agreed with statements capturing the idea that their nation deserves far more recognition than it gets, scored on a scale from one to four. Stress was measured by asking how often, over the past month, someone felt unable to control important things in life. Depression was screened with two questions about feeling down or losing interest in activities. Researchers then leaned on a statistical method that tracks how one trait at an earlier point predicts another later on, which let them untangle the direction of the links.

With nearly 700 participants, the sample was large enough to catch even modest relationships between the variables. Researchers also controlled for each person’s general tendency toward negative moods, so the results would not simply reflect the fact that some people are gloomier by nature.

Political and societal stress can spill over into symptoms including fatigue, anxiety, and headaches.
While national narcissism appears to be a comfort for many of its adherents, holding it was linked to higher stress down the road. (Credit: gpointstudio on Shutterstock)

National Narcissism Came First, Stress Followed

Only one predictive link surfaced in the analysis: national narcissism in the first round predicted higher stress by the second. Neither stress nor depressive symptoms predicted stronger national narcissism later on. That pattern held whether participants were in their late teens or their late twenties, and it did not shift across the status measures the researchers tested, including education, employment, and financial strain.

Going in, the team expected that people in lower-status spots, younger participants or those with thinner financial cushions, might show a tighter link between emotional distress and national narcissism, since they arguably have more to gain by hitching their self-worth to national identity. That expectation did not pan out. Results looked much the same across the board.

There was one more wrinkle. Stress and depressive symptoms both tracked closely with a person’s baseline tendency toward negative moods, as expected. National narcissism behaved differently: it was not tied to that emotional baseline in the same way, which hints that the belief is not just another expression of a gloomy disposition.

An Endless Chase for Recognition

Why would believing a nation is secretly great breed stress rather than ease it? Drawing on a psychological framework about how people react when their self-worth feels threatened, the authors describe national narcissism as a chase with no finish line. Someone who draws importance from a nation’s supposed greatness stays exposed to a steady drip of threats: foreign criticism, unflattering news coverage, political setbacks, or simply the sense that the world is shortchanging their country. Living in that state of constant vigilance, the authors argue, wears a person down.

They also flag that national narcissism predicted stress but not depressive symptoms over the year studied. One reading is that the puffed-up self-image these beliefs carry may shield people from low mood in the short run, even as the endless hunger for outside validation keeps stress simmering. Another possibility the authors raise is that the heavier emotional toll may need longer than a year to show itself.

Easing Stress May Not Shift the Belief

There is a practical edge to all this. If some people adopt nationally narcissistic beliefs in response to emotional difficulties, it would seem to follow that helping them feel better, through therapy, community, or fewer life stressors, should loosen those beliefs on its own. Yet the data cut against that hope. Because stress and depressive symptoms did not appear to be feeding national narcissism in the first place, at least among young adults over this stretch of time, easing those states may not be enough by itself to move the underlying belief.

Instead, the authors argue, anything that works would have to target the craving for outside validation and the touchiness about perceived threats to national status that seem to keep the belief alive. Lowering someone’s stress load is worth doing for its own sake, but it may leave untouched the conviction that their country is owed recognition it never receives.

This work has clear limits. It ran for only a year, possibly too short a window to capture every way these beliefs and emotions feed each other over time. Its participants were all Czech young adults, so whether the same pattern shows up in older people or in other countries is still an open question. And with just two time points, the researchers could not fully separate change within a single person from broader differences across the group.

Even so, in a media diet stuffed with hot takes about rising nationalism, political grievance, and collective anger, the study supplies something in short supply: actual longitudinal data on what tends to come before national narcissism and what tends to follow it. On the evidence here, believing a nation is secretly great offers less comfort than its holders might count on, and it was linked to more stress later, not less.


Disclaimer: This article summarizes findings from a peer-reviewed scientific study and is intended for informational purposes only. The results describe statistical relationships observed in a specific group of participants and do not prove cause and effect. Individual experiences may differ, and the findings should not be taken as psychological, medical, or mental health advice.


Paper Notes

Limitations

Participants were followed for about a year between survey rounds, a span that may be too short to capture slower-developing links between national narcissism and emotion. According to the authors, some effects, particularly any influence of stress and depressive symptoms on national narcissism, might operate over shorter windows than a year, while others may need longer to surface. With only two survey waves, the researchers could not separate change within individual people over time from differences that already existed between people at the start, a distinction that bears on conclusions about underlying psychological processes. Every participant was a Czech young adult, which limits how far the results stretch to older populations or other countries. The authors also note that objective status markers such as education or employment may matter less than how people personally judge their group’s standing, a difference the study was not built to test fully.

Funding and Disclosures

Data collection and the work of Michal Mužík were supported by the Czech Science Foundation (grant number GA22-27941S). The work of Anna Knorr and Małgorzata Kossowska was supported by IP-PAD, funded by the European Union under the Horizon Europe MSCA Doctoral Networks programme (Grant Agreement No. 101072992), with participation from the UKRI Horizon Europe guarantee scheme. The authors declared no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work.

Publication Details

Authors: Michal Mužík (Masaryk University, Faculty of Social Studies, The Psychology Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic); Anna Knorr and Małgorzata Kossowska (Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Poland). | Journal: Journal of Research in Personality, Volume 122, 2026, Article 104721. | Paper Title: “The (not so) vicious cycle of national narcissism: emotional antecedents and outcomes.” | DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2026.104721 | Ethical Approval: Masaryk University Research Ethics Committee, reference number EKV-2021-045. | Data Availability: Pre-registered on the Open Science Framework (osf.io/xm26y); data and code available at osf.io/m32g8.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment