An orca swims next to a shark with a visible wound. (Image by Marco Villegas)
Sharks are usually the hunters, but these killer whales have developed a surprising new way to enjoy a meal.
In A Nutshell
- Killer whales in Mexico’s Gulf of California flip juvenile great white sharks upside down to trigger a paralysis-like state, then extract and eat only the liver while leaving the rest of the carcass behind.
- The same pod, nicknamed “Moctezuma,” has been filmed hunting at least six different shark and ray species, adjusting its attack strategy for each prey type, from grabbing devil rays by the wingtip to tail-slapping stingrays to avoid their venomous spines.
- Two attacks happened at the same location exactly two years apart, suggesting the whales may have learned when and where juvenile sharks appear, turning them into a seasonal menu item.
- Adult white sharks flee when killer whales show up, but researchers don’t yet know if juveniles recognize the danger, which could leave young sharks especially vulnerable in their nursery areas.
Off the coast of Mexico, a pod of killer whales has developed a specialized hunting technique. They flip juvenile great white sharks upside down in a way that likely triggers a trance-like paralysis, then extract their livers while discarding the rest of the carcass.
Researchers captured two attacks on video: one in August 2020 and another in August 2022, at nearly the same spot in the Gulf of California. Both times, the orcas targeted sharks about two meters long, around six and a half feet. The footage reveals a deliberate method: repeated strikes, maneuvering the young sharks belly-up in what likely induces tonic immobility, a physiological state that leaves them defenseless and unable to move.
Once the shark goes limp, the killer whales access the liver with precision. In one attack, the organ emerged intact at the surface. An adult female held it in her mouth, its distinctive two-lobed shape clearly visible. She released it to another whale. For several minutes, four pod members passed the liver between them before finally consuming it.
During one sequence, a California sea lion tried to grab a piece. The orcas drove it off by exhaling bubbles. The researchers noted in their study, published in Frontiers in Marine Science, that the killer whales shared the liver among pod members, including calves.
A Pod That Adapts Its Methods
Photo analysis identified at least three killer whales from the 2020 incident as members of the “Moctezuma pod,” a group documented hunting multiple shark and ray species across the Gulf of California between 2018 and 2023.
The pod adapts its technique to each prey type. When hunting Munk’s pygmy devil rays, they target stragglers at the edge of schools, grabbing them by the wingtip before repositioning to control the head. Pelagic stingrays get slammed with forceful tail strikes to stun them and avoid their venomous spines. Bull sharks require different handling altogether.
For white sharks, the flipping technique likely induces paralysis and allows access to the liver without risking a bite. A 2.5-meter white shark can generate bite forces exceeding 3,000 newtons, enough to cause serious injury and derail an attack.
This behavioral flexibility sets the pod apart. Killer whale populations worldwide tend to focus on narrow prey types, with distinct groups hunting fish, marine mammals, or sharks. The Moctezuma pod hunts at least six elasmobranch species using adapted methods for each, which points to an unusually diverse skill set.
Shark livers offer high nutritional rewards. These massive, oil-rich organs can comprise up to a third of the animal’s total weight. For an orca, it is high-calorie fuel for relatively low effort once the extraction technique is learned.
But learning that technique requires practice and coordination. The 2020 footage shows the process unfolding. One young female pushed the shark from below toward the surface while it bled from its underside. The whales took turns controlling the inverted shark, working together. After several minutes underwater, an adult female surfaced with the liver and began passing it among the pod.
Seven minutes into the video, the whales attacked a second juvenile white shark. This one was worked over repeatedly until its liver began protruding from the right side of its body, partially exposed. At eleven minutes, the shark sank motionless. Pink tissue floated at the surface.
The 2022 attack followed a similar pattern. An adult female surfaced with the shark held below, mouth open, large pectoral fins visible. The characteristic black tips on the underside of white shark pectorals can be seen in the footage. The shark bled from its gills, liver exposed on the left side. Minutes later, pieces of liver tissue appeared in the mouths of the females. The adult male and a calf fed at the surface. Seabirds including boobies, gulls, pelicans, and frigates arrived to scavenge scraps.
Why Killer Whales Hunt Juvenile Sharks Instead of Adults
Most documented killer whale predation on white sharks involves larger individuals. In South Africa, Australia, and California, attacks have occurred at sites where subadult and adult sharks gather. A documented case in Mossel Bay, South Africa, involved a white shark about 2.5 meters long, still larger than the juveniles in the Gulf of California.
Smaller sharks may be easier to handle. Inducing tonic immobility and controlling a six-foot animal is more manageable than dealing with a 12- to 16-foot adult. The risk of injury drops as well. Even a juvenile’s bite can cause damage, but the force is substantially less than an adult’s crushing jaws.
Adult white sharks have learned to fear killer whales. In California, researchers documented mass evacuations from feeding areas when orcas appeared, with sharks fleeing and not returning for extended periods. That fear response requires memory and experience. Whether juveniles have developed this response is unknown, which may leave them more vulnerable.
White sharks exhibit natal philopatry, meaning females return to the same areas to give birth. Juvenile sharks appear in predictable nurseries, segregated from adult feeding grounds. If killer whales learn these locations, young sharks may become vulnerable seasonal targets, appearing year after year without the wariness that might save them.
The Gulf of California incidents occurred at the same location in mid-August, two years apart. That timing suggests potential seasonal availability. If juvenile sharks gather in this area during late summer, and if the Moctezuma pod has learned this pattern, the attacks may not be purely opportunistic but instead calculated returns to a known hunting ground.
Ocean warming has been linked to white shark range shifts. Events like El Niño and marine heat waves have pushed juveniles into new areas, including increased sightings in the Gulf of California over the past decade. If climate-driven redistribution is placing young sharks in territories where year-round killer whale pods patrol, the sharks may be encountering predators they have not evolved to avoid.
Potential Impacts on White Shark Populations
White sharks mature slowly and have reproductive cycles exceeding 12 months. Consistent predation on juveniles at aggregation sites could affect populations already facing threats from fishing bycatch and habitat changes driven by warming oceans.
In South Africa, killer whale predation has been controversial, with some researchers linking it to coastal displacements of entire white shark populations and subsequent ecological changes. Others argue the data does not support such conclusions. The debate continues, but the potential for localized impacts remains real.
Whether the Gulf of California attacks represent an emerging pattern or isolated events is still unknown. Two documented incidents do not establish a trend, but they raise important questions. Are other juvenile sharks being killed without documentation? Are additional killer whale pods developing similar techniques? Do juvenile sharks in this region show any behavioral response to orcas, or are they naïve prey?
Scientists note the need for continued monitoring of juvenile white shark ranges, testing for fear responses, and documenting additional interactions. Big-picture population conclusions require more data, but the repeated nature of these attacks and the involvement of a pod with documented hunting expertise across multiple shark species suggest something more than chance encounters.
Female white sharks likely continue to give birth in the same locations, unaware of recent killer whale predation activity. As a result, juvenile white sharks could be more susceptible to consistent exploitation at aggregation sites, unlike adults that flee when orcas arrive.
For the Moctezuma pod, juvenile white sharks appear to have joined a menu that already includes devil rays, stingrays, bull sharks, whale sharks, and prickly sharks. The pod hunts each species with adapted methods and often focuses on the rich liver, which is shared within the group. The pattern points to learned behavior passed between generations and offers one more demonstration of killer whale intelligence and adaptability in the ocean’s complex food web.
Paper Summary
Methodology
Researchers documented two separate killer whale attacks on juvenile white sharks in the southwestern Gulf of California, Mexico. The first occurred on August 15, 2020, and the second on August 3, 2022, at nearly the same location. Documentation included high-resolution video from Canon DSLR cameras with 100–400 mm lenses, underwater footage using a Canon DSLR in a Nauticam housing with an 11–24 mm lens, and aerial video from DJI Phantom 4 Pro and Inspire 2 X7 drones, all captured from a 9-meter fiberglass boat. Researchers recorded date, time, location, group composition (calves, juveniles, subadults, and adults), traveling mode, and feeding behavior for each incident. Shark size was estimated by comparing total length with the killer whales and the research vessel. Individual killer whales were photo-identified using high-quality video frame shots of dorsal fins, examining distinctive features including scars and nicks. Species identification of the sharks was confirmed through visual analysis of key morphological features including body shape, coloration, fin structure, tail morphology, and the distinctive caudal keel.
Results
The first event on August 15, 2020, involved five female killer whales (four subadults approximately 4 meters long and one adult approximately 6 meters long) attacking two juvenile white sharks, each approximately 2 meters in total length. The killer whales demonstrated coordinated hunting behavior, repeatedly striking and manipulating the sharks while keeping them upside down, apparently to induce tonic immobility. The mammals carefully removed the livers from both sharks, with pod members taking turns holding and passing the organs between them for several minutes before consuming them. A California sea lion attempted to obtain part of the liver but was discouraged by the orcas exhaling bubbles.
The second event on August 3, 2022, involved approximately five killer whales (one adult male, one adult female, two subadults, and one calf) attacking a juvenile white shark of similar size. The adult female held the shark below the surface with its mouth open and pectoral fins visible. The shark’s liver was exposed and bleeding from the gills. Pieces of liver tissue were visible in the mouths of the females, and the male orca and calf were observed feeding on liver tissue at the surface. Several seabird species including boobies, gulls, pelicans, and frigates were also observed feeding on pieces of shark tissue. Photo-identification analysis confirmed that at least three of the killer whales from the 2020 attack (designated KWM1, KWM2, and KWM3) were members of a pod previously observed hunting other elasmobranch species in the Gulf of California between 2018 and 2023, including Munk’s pygmy devil rays, pelagic stingrays, and bull sharks, with each prey type hunted using specifically adapted techniques.
Limitations
The study is based on opportunistic observations of only two predation events documented on video, which limits the ability to draw population-level inferences about predation frequency or patterns. Photo-identification could not be completed for all killer whales present in the second attack, making it impossible to confirm whether the same individuals or pod were involved in both events. Shark size estimations were made through visual comparison with the killer whales and research vessel rather than direct measurement, which introduces potential measurement error. The researchers could not determine whether the observed predation represents an emerging pattern, seasonal targeting, or isolated incidents without additional long-term observations. The study area was limited to the southwestern Gulf of California, so findings may not be generalizable to other regions where white sharks and killer whales co-occur. Researchers could not assess whether juvenile white sharks in this area exhibit behavioral risk effects (fear responses) to killer whale presence, as adult white sharks do in other locations. The ecological ecotype of the Gulf of California killer whales remains unclear, with observations suggesting characteristics of multiple known ecotypes.
Funding and Disclosures
The authors declared that no financial support was received for the research or publication of this article. The authors also declared they were editorial board members of Frontiers at the time of submission but noted this had no impact on the peer review process and final decision. The authors declared that no Generative AI was used in the creation of the manuscript.
Publication Details
Higuera-Rivas, J.E., Pancaldi, F., Jorgensen, S.J., and Hoyos-Padilla, E.M. (2025). Novel evidence of interaction between killer whales (Orcinus orca) and juvenile white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) in the Gulf of California, Mexico. Frontiers in Marine Science, 12:1667683. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1667683. Published November 3, 2025.







