Indian woman workers walking in the field on morning.

(Credit: © njbfoto - stock.adobe.com)

In One Part of India, a Baby’s Gender Can Shape Grandmother’s Anxiety and Mom’s Job Chances

In A Nutshell

  • A study of 1,296 mother-in-law and daughter-in-law pairs in rural Uttar Pradesh found that when a daughter-in-law’s firstborn was a boy, her mother-in-law was measurably less likely to screen at risk for anxiety or depression.
  • The effect was comparable in size to the mental health benefits of pension programs and inheritance law reforms seen in other Indian research.
  • Daughters-in-law showed no average mental health effect, but those over 27 with no son faced significantly higher risk.
  • Among daughters-in-law under 25, a firstborn son raised the odds of having worked in the past year by 15 percentage points, largely because mothers-in-law became more supportive of them working.

In rural northern India, whether a woman’s first child is a boy or a girl can shape her mother-in-law’s mental health and, years later, her own chances of working outside the home. A new study tracking pairs of mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law in one district of Uttar Pradesh documents just how far the pressure to produce a son reaches, touching two generations of women at once. The authors caution that findings may not generalize to settings where older women live independently or son preference is less pronounced.

India’s deeply entrenched preference for male children carries measurable consequences for women’s lives, and this study offers a sharper picture of who bears them and when.

At the center of this story is the mother-in-law, a figure who has long wielded quiet but significant authority over younger women in Indian households. The study, published in the Journal of Development Economics, found that when a daughter-in-law’s first child was a boy, her mother-in-law was noticeably less likely to show signs of anxiety or depression on the researchers’ screening test. When the firstborn was a girl, the older woman carried a heavier psychological burden, tied to cultural expectations about lineage and a son’s role in carrying on the family name.

1,572 Households in Uttar Pradesh Reveal a Pattern Tied to a Baby’s Sex

Researchers surveyed 1,572 pairs of mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law living together in Jaunpur district, Uttar Pradesh, from November 2023 to May 2024, a rural area with firmly traditional gender norms.

To qualify, a daughter-in-law had to be 18 to 35, have given birth to at least one child, be neither pregnant nor sterilized, and be living with her mother-in-law. Surveyors interviewed each woman separately and privately with a four-question screening tool called the PHQ-4, asking how often in the past two weeks each had felt nervous, hopeless, or lost interest in things she normally enjoys.

A final analysis drew on 1,296 complete pairs, 95 percent Hindu, with about 90 percent belonging to a Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe, or Other Backward Class. Nearly half of households were poor. Mothers-in-law averaged 56 years old, daughters-in-law 26.

Wealthier families can use sex-selection technology to choose later children’s sex, which could skew results, so researchers focused instead on the firstborn’s sex, plausibly close to random in India even where sex selection occurs at later births.

indian sons
In rural India, a firstborn son eases a mother-in-law’s anxiety and a young wife’s odds of working, new research finds. (Image by StudyFinds)

A Grandson Cuts a Mother-in-Law’s Depression Risk by 15 Percent

Among mothers-in-law, 31 percent screened at risk for anxiety or depression, versus 18 percent of daughters-in-law. Those rates are higher than global estimates for anxiety disorders and depression, although researchers caution the measures aren’t directly comparable.

When a daughter-in-law’s firstborn was a boy, her mother-in-law’s risk dropped by about 5 percentage points, a 15 percent reduction, roughly comparable to the mental health effects of public pensions and inheritance law reforms in other Indian studies. The effect was strongest when daughters-in-law were under 25, since more childbearing years ahead means a longer stretch of uncertainty about whether a grandson will arrive.

For daughters-in-law, the picture was more complicated. On average, firstborn sex made no difference to their mental health, but daughters-in-law above 27 showed higher risk if they had no son. As a woman’s childbearing window narrows, a missing son shifts from a temporary situation to something that feels permanent, and the psychological cost climbs.

A Firstborn Son Opens the Door to Work for Young Wives

On average, daughters-in-law with a firstborn son were no more likely to be employed. But among those under 25, a firstborn son raised the odds of having worked in the past year by 15 percentage points, a substantial jump given that female labor force participation among younger women hovers around 24 percent.

Researchers describe the likely pathway as running through the mother-in-law, though they call this evidence suggestive rather than proven. When a grandson is born, mothers-in-law appear to spend more time on childcare, less time outside the home, and grow more approving of daughters-in-law working outside the house, about 12 percentage points more likely among younger daughters-in-law with firstborn sons. Only 42 percent of mothers-in-law approved of daughters-in-law working while children were young, versus 85 percent once children were older, a gap that shows how much sway the older woman holds over the household. Husbands played a limited role in reproductive decisions, partly because nearly half had been away from home for at least six months for work.

Employment gains for younger daughters-in-law came mainly from actually finding work rather than looking for it. They were more likely to work for family members or outside the home, though not more likely to earn wages directly, a shift less about new job access and more about finally having the time to take part in work already available.

Researchers say this points to something often missed in conversations about women’s economic participation in India: the gatekeeper isn’t always the husband. In these households, it’s often the mother-in-law shaping the schedule and the childcare, and programs aimed at boosting women’s workforce participation may be running into a wall not yet fully identified.


Disclaimer: This article is based on findings from a single observational study conducted in one rural district of India. The results reflect associations identified through the study’s design and may not generalize to other regions, households where mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law do not live together, or settings with weaker son preference.


Paper Notes

Limitations

The study’s cross-sectional design is its primary limitation. Because all data was collected at a single point in time, the research cannot show how mental health and labor force participation evolve over the course of women’s lives following a firstborn birth. Time-use measures rely on single-day recall and may undercount childcare that happens alongside other tasks. Researchers also cannot fully separate the sequence of cause and effect among mental health improvements, attitudinal shifts among mothers-in-law, and changes in time allocation, since these likely happen simultaneously. Because the sample consists only of co-residing mother-in-law and daughter-in-law pairs in one district of Uttar Pradesh, the findings may not generalize to settings where older women live independently or where son preference is less pronounced. Husbands’ approval of daughters-in-law working was not directly measured; the study instead captured their involvement in work decisions.

Funding and Disclosures

This project received funding from the World Bank Development Research Group, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Hatch Funding (ILLU-470-375), and the Program on Women’s Empowerment Research (POWER) through a grant from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation (Grant No. 2020-1162). Funding organizations had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or writing. The authors declare no competing financial interests. Ethical approval was granted by Boston University (Protocol ID: 6567E) and Monk Prayogshala Institutional Review Board (Protocol ID: 098-022) in India.

Publication Details

Authors: S. Anukriti (Development Research Group, The World Bank), Catalina Herrera-Almanza (Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), Shahadat Hossain (Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), and Mahesh Karra (Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University). | Journal: Journal of Development Economics, Volume 183 (2026), Article 103867. This article is part of a special issue titled “Mental Health and Socioeconomic Outcomes.” | Paper Title: “Son preference, intergenerational household dynamics, and women’s mental health in India” | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2026.103867 | Published online: June 24, 2026. Replication data available at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/KEMPRE.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor