A cube of natural uranium from the German nuclear project. Credit: John T. Consoli, University of Maryland College Park, MD.
Nazi Germany Could Not Have Built a Nuclear Reactor With Its Wartime Materials, Study Finds
In A Nutshell
- Heisenberg claimed Germany’s last nuclear reactor barely missed working.
- It needed about twice the uranium it held, a new study finds.
- Germany’s entire estimated uranium and heavy water supply fell short.
- Germany’s graphite was too boron-contaminated to work either.
After World War II, physicist Werner Heisenberg told the world that Nazi Germany’s final nuclear reactor had barely missed working. A new analysis in PNAS Nexus says the gap was far wider. Getting the machine to run on its own would have taken about twice the uranium and more than twice the heavy water it held.
Heisenberg designed that reactor, the B8 pile, and his team assembled it in April 1945 in the village of Haigerloch, just before Germany surrendered. The design was a tank of heavy water with hundreds of uranium cubes hanging inside on chains. It never produced a self-sustaining chain reaction, the cycle of atom splitting that keeps a reactor going on its own. Writing in the journal Nature in 1947, Heisenberg said the material on hand was “just insufficient,” and that adding only “a relatively small amount of uranium” would probably have done the job.
Those claims shaped decades of debate. Some historians took Heisenberg at his word. Others, including author Richard Rhodes, argued Germany’s real blunder was choosing heavy water, a rare form of water that slows the particles driving a chain reaction, over graphite, the carbon material American scientists used to build the world’s first working reactor in 1942. From 1939 to 1942, Americans framed their own program as an effort to catch up with Germany. Yet few technical evaluations of what Germany actually built exist.
Only 14 of Roughly 1,100 Uranium Cubes Are Known to Survive
Checking Heisenberg was difficult because the physical evidence scattered. Uranium and equipment from Germany’s program landed in American and Soviet intelligence collections or on the black market, and much of the original data stayed classified into the 1970s. Of roughly 1,100 uranium cubes Germany’s program possessed, only 14 are known to exist today.
A team of six researchers, including physicist Patrick Park of Columbia University, examined two of those cubes. Weighing and measuring one showed it was slightly less dense than pure uranium because of tiny air pockets inside the metal. A radiation scan of another confirmed it was natural uranium, meaning it had not been processed to make it more reactive.
Next came the paper trail. Wartime German documents, Norwegian heavy water production records, and postwar Allied surveys of German industry filled in details the original files never recorded. Heavy water purity came from a 1947 American measurement of samples recovered from the B8, since no wartime record appears to survive. Researchers fed everything into a computer simulation of the reactor and checked it against readings Heisenberg’s own team took in 1945. The two matched closely.
Nazi Germany’s Nuclear Reactor Needed Double the Uranium and 2.2 Times the Heavy Water
As built, the B8 scored 0.94 on the scale physicists use, where 1.0 marks a reactor that keeps itself going. A gap of about 6% sounds easy to close. The study’s model says otherwise. A working version would have needed roughly 6,900 pounds of uranium and 820 gallons of heavy water, far more than the 3,400 pounds and 370 gallons the B8 held. Heisenberg’s own 1948 estimate, growing the core “by not quite half,” amounted to about 50% more material, by the authors’ reading.
Pooling every bit of uranium and heavy water that Germany’s reactor teams are estimated to have had still left the B8 short of a chain reaction. Heavy water was the tighter bottleneck: a working reactor needed about 1.8 times what Germany had available, compared with 1.2 times for uranium. Its only European source, a plant in Vemork, Norway, made about 3.1 tons during the war. The French took some in 1940, a 1942 experiment exploded and destroyed more, and Norwegian commandos sank another batch in 1944, leaving at most about 2 tons for Germany by 1945.
Boron-Contaminated Graphite Ruled Out a German Nuclear Reactor Too
Graphite offered no escape route. The study modeled reactors built with the graphite Germany actually had, reused from an earlier experiment called B7, and paired with German uranium. No such reactor could reach a chain reaction at any realistic spacing between cubes. The culprit was boron, a natural impurity that soaks up the particles a chain reaction depends on. The graphite carried impurities estimated at the equivalent of 3.4 parts per million of boron, a level nearly identical to that of a commercial graphite that physicists Enrico Fermi and Leo Szilard tested in 1940 and rejected.
American graphite came out cleaner because it started with a rare low-boron petroleum coke, a refining byproduct, found in Pennsylvania in 1941, and then got careful purification. After a British naval blockade began in January 1940, German makers could no longer import American petroleum coke and turned to coal-based coke from the Ruhr region, which carried up to roughly twice the impurities of petroleum coke. Only purer uranium or access to American-style coke could have rescued a German graphite design, the authors found.
Heisenberg’s near-miss story does not hold up against the calculations. With heavy water or graphite, the materials Germany had in 1945 could not have produced a working reactor.
Paper Notes
Limitations
Results rest on physical tests of only two of the roughly 1,100 uranium cubes, since just 14 are known to survive. No wartime record of the B8 heavy water’s purity appears to survive, so the authors used a 96.8% figure measured in 1947 and tested how sensitive their results were to that assumption. Even with perfectly pure heavy water, the reactor’s score rose only from 0.94252 to 0.95026. The graphite’s boron content was estimated from ash analysis of the earlier B7 experiment, and burning graphite can release some boron as gas, so ash tests can underestimate the original amount. The graphite verdict also depends on the authors’ own cutoff for what counts as a realistically sized reactor. Germany’s total wartime heavy water supply is itself an estimate, built from a 1960s account by the chief engineer of the Norwegian plant and later histories. Heisenberg’s 1945 neutron measurements were reported without error bars, so the authors relied on a previously published uncertainty estimate when comparing their simulation to his data.
Funding and Disclosures
Patrick Park was partially funded by the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under award number DE-NA0003920. The authors declared no competing interests.
Publication Details
Titled “Nuclear archaeology reassesses Heisenberg’s last reactor experiment,” the study was written by Patrick J. Park (Columbia University and Reed College), Brittany Robertson (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory), Miriam E. Hiebert (University of Maryland), Jason Zhao (Texas A&M University), Ciara B. Sivels (Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory), and Timothy W. Koeth (University of Maryland). It was received April 28, 2026, accepted August 9, 2026, and published September 29, 2026, as a research report in PNAS Nexus, Volume 5, Issue 9, article pgag282, edited by Derek Abbott. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag282.







