headway-537308-unsplash

(Photo by Headway on Unsplash)

NIJMEGEN, Netherlands — It’s long been understood that non-verbal communications are important way of conveying meaning and intent, perhaps even more so than verbal communications. But new research indicates that mixing words with gestures will bring the most clarity to a listener.

Researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics and Radboud University Nijmegen in the Netherlands found that gestures can actually speed up language processing between two individuals in a conversation.

Person using hand gestures while talking
A new study finds that using hand gestures and other forms of non-verbal communication while asking a question to a person can help them process what you’re saying and come up with a response faster. (Photo by Headway on Unsplash)

“Bodily signals appear to profoundly influence language processing in interaction,” explains Judith Holler, of the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, in a release. “Questions accompanied by gestures lead to shorter turn transition times—that is, to faster responses—than questions without gestures, and responses come even earlier when gestures end before compared to after the question turn has ended.”

Holler and her team analyzed the interactions of seven groups comprised of three participants. Each group was left alone in a recording studio for 20 minutes. The interactions between the individuals were filmed using three high-definition cameras. Focusing on the question-and-answer components of conversations in the groups, Holler’s team calculated that questions were answered much faster when the asker used head nodding and hand gestures to complement their words.

“The empirical findings presented here provide a first glimpse of the possible role of the body in the psycholinguistic processes underpinning human communication,” explains Holler. “They also provide a stepping stone for investigating these processes and mechanisms in much more depth in the future.”

The speaker’s gestures could be cuing the listener that they are ending their question early, thus giving the listener more time to think of a response.

The full study was published in September 2017 in the Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.

About Ben Renner

Writer, editor, curator, and social media manager based in Denver, Colorado. View my writing at http://rennerb1.wixsite.com/benrenner.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment

1 Comment