
(Credit: Photo by Magda Ehlers on Unsplash)
Scientists Suggest Leaving One Patch of Grass Unmown Could Help Protect the Bugs Your Garden Depends On
In a Nutshell
- Meadows left uncut hold up to 73 percent more insects and spiders than mown ones, based on data from more than 1,600 samples across Germany and Switzerland.
- The type of mower matters, with bar mowers gentlest and mulchers and sickle mowers among the most damaging, but skipping the cut helps far more than switching machines.
- A free online tool, the Insect Calculator, lets anyone estimate how many meadow creatures live in a plot and how many a cut would cost.
Mow a patch of grass, and the insects and spiders living in it take a staggering hit. Meadows left uncut hold as much as 73 percent more of these creatures than mown ones, according to a new study out of Germany and Switzerland. Some are killed outright by the blades; others lose much of the shelter and habitat they depend on.
That gap comes from researchers who spent years gathering data on meadow creatures and built it into a free online tool anyone can use. Called the “Insect Calculator,” it lets a person punch in details about a plot of grass and get a rough estimate of how many crawling, hopping, and flying residents live there, along with how many are likely to vanish after a cut. The research was published in the journal Ecological Solutions and Evidence.
Insects don’t often draw the type of spotlight that whales or polar bears do, yet they hold ecosystems together by pollinating plants, feeding birds, and breaking down waste. Their numbers have been sliding for decades, and mowing turns out to be one of the quieter culprits, a routine chore that most people never think twice about.

How Researchers Counted Insects
To reach their conclusions, the team pulled together records from 11 separate studies, combining published work with data collected by their own group. All told, the pooled dataset covered 1,686 samples taken across 20 regions in Germany and Switzerland, adding up to 475,202 individual arthropods, the scientific umbrella term for insects, spiders, and their relatives. Samples were collected during the summer months, between early May and late September, from 2012 through 2023.
Every sample followed the same method. Field workers used a modified leaf blower to vacuum up the tiny animals from a one-square-meter patch, roughly the size of a large beach towel. That consistency let the researchers stack results from many locations side by side without comparing apples to oranges. The grasslands ranged from farm hayfields to city parks to the strips of green that line roads.
Ten different groups of creatures were tracked, among them beetles, spiders, grasshoppers, true bugs, and cicada relatives. Feeding all of it into a statistical model, the researchers built formulas that weigh 12 factors, including how often a field is cut, what kind of machine does the cutting, how tall the grass is left, and how much paved surface surrounds the area.
What Insect Numbers Reveal About Lawn Mowing
Mowing itself, more than any fancy detail about technique, tracked with the most damage. Unmown meadows held about 265 arthropods per square meter, while mown ones held only 122. That gap is where the 73 percent figure comes from. Species variety showed a similar split, dropping 42 percent, from roughly 37 kinds of creatures down to 24.
Not all mowers are equal, though. Bar mowers, which slice with a horizontal reciprocating blade like a barber’s clippers, proved the gentlest. Mulchers and sickle mowers, which chop and shred vegetation at high speed, were among the most damaging in the data, likely because their spinning mechanisms kill more of the animals caught underneath. Researchers caution that some mower types were represented by far fewer samples than others, so those comparisons carry more uncertainty.
Pavement matters as well. Grasslands ringed by concrete and asphalt held fewer arthropods than those in open rural settings, a reflection of how cities fragment and heat the small habitats squeezed between buildings.
As the authors write, “mowing itself has the most significant negative impact on arthropod density.” That wording is a fragment of a longer sentence, but the point stands: swapping to a kinder machine or cutting less often helps, yet skipping the cut entirely helps far more.
Why Leaving a Patch Unmown Pays Off
That insight points to a simple fix the researchers keep returning to: refuges, small sections left standing while the rest gets trimmed. To show what that buys, the calculator runs a sample scenario rather than a real field count. Mow a 100-square-meter meadow completely and about 13,000 insects and spiders remain, by the tool’s estimate. Leave 10 percent uncut and the count climbs to 14,350. Leave 30 percent standing, and it reaches 17,050. A meadow left entirely alone supports around 26,500.
Rotational mowing, where only part of a field is cut at a time, and the rest waits for a later date, creates these safe zones without letting the grass grow wild everywhere. The leftover patches give larvae a place to develop, insects a spot to hide during the cut, and overwintering creatures somewhere to survive the cold.
The tool comes in two modes. A “Walking Mode” serves curious passersby who might scan a QR code on a park sign, asking only for basic information. An “Expert Mode” opens up every setting for farmers, landscapers, and city crews who manage green space for a living. Both versions also link to nearby wildlife sightings logged on iNaturalist, a citizen science app, so users can see which species might actually be underfoot.
Bigger Picture for Backyards and Roadsides
Insects, unlike large animals, can benefit enormously from small changes made close to home. A strip of uncut grass along a driveway or a corner of a park left shaggy costs almost nothing yet returns real gains. The researchers built their calculator precisely because scientific findings so often stay locked in journals, far from the people holding the mower.
Their message lands with unusual clarity. Every cut carries a cost measured in thousands of tiny lives, and the most effective way to protect them is also the easiest: leave a little grass standing.
Disclaimer: This report is intended for general informational and educational purposes and reflects research and expert opinions available at the time of publication. It should not be construed as professional, legal, medical, or ecological management advice, and readers should consult appropriate qualified professionals before making decisions based on its content. While efforts have been made to accurately summarize the study findings and tools described, including the Insect Calculator, no guarantee is made as to completeness, accuracy, or applicability to every situation. Any actions you take regarding mowing practices, habitat management, or wildlife conservation are undertaken at your own discretion and risk.
Paper Notes
Limitations
The calculator relies on additive models that treat each factor separately and do not fully capture how the variables interact in the real world. Predictions run less accurately for ants and aphids, which cluster in colonies and nests rather than spreading evenly across a field, and some mower types rested on thin data, such as motor scythes with only 12 samples compared with more than a thousand for rotary mowers. The dataset also lacks records for winter conditions, very high cutting frequencies, and unusually wide mowing equipment, so estimates for those situations are shakier. Because a user can enter any location or habitat, including ones the tool was never designed for, results can stray if applied outside typical mown grasslands. Factors like grazing, fertilizer, and weather were left out for lack of consistent data, though the authors note a related study found mowing outweighed those influences. It is also worth remembering that the underlying records are observational and drawn only from Germany and Switzerland, so the figures describe associations rather than proof that mowing directly causes every loss.
Funding and Disclosures
The research was conducted within the BioDivKultur project, part of the Research Initiative for the Conservation of Biodiversity (FEdA), funded by Germany’s Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space (formerly the Federal Ministry of Education and Research), under grant number 16LW0074K. Open access publication was arranged through Projekt DEAL. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
Publication Details
Paper Title: “The Insect Calculator: A web tool to predict meadow arthropods based on mowing impacts”
Authors: Johanna L. Berger, Margarita Hartlieb, Lea von Berg, Alexandra Brion, Martin H. Entling, Jonas Frank, Jean-Yves Humbert, Karsten Mody, Manuela Sann, Michael Staab, Wolfgang W. Weisser, and senior author Nico BlĂ¼thgen.
Author Affiliations: The team represents institutions across Germany, Switzerland, Austria, and Spain, led by the Technical University of Darmstadt.
Journal: Ecological Solutions and Evidence, a journal of the British Ecological Society.
DOI: 10.1002/2688-8319.70271.
Published Online: June 28, 2026
The Insect Calculator tool is available at insektentaschenrechner.de/en.







