
(© AntonioDiaz - stock.adobe.com)
Chronic Stress May Age Blood Stem Cells Faster, and Gut Bacteria Could Help Explain Why
In A Nutshell
- Chronic psychological stress made blood stem cells in mice act older, weakening their ability to renew and produce infection-fighting immune cells.
- Researchers traced the damage to a pathway running from specific brain regions through the gut’s nervous system and into the bone marrow.
- A gut bacterium called Lactobacillus reuteri and the compound it produces, spermidine, dropped sharply under stress and appear to help drive the damage.
- Giving stressed mice spermidine or the bacteria that produce it helped reverse several of the aging-like changes, though the work has not yet been tested in humans.
Chronic stress doesn’t just wear a person down emotionally. It may also age their immune system, at least according to new research in mice tracing a chain reaction from the brain to the gut to the bone marrow.
The stress of life’s rough’s moments, such as a painful breakup or unexpected layoff, take an undeniable toll in the immediate aftermath. Now research suggests all that worry may run deeper than impacting mood or sleep. Scientists have discovered that psychological stress triggers a cascade that forces blood stem cells, the master cells behind every blood and immune cell in the body, to behave as if they belong to a much older organism.
These stressed cells lose their ability to renew themselves and produce fewer lymphoid immune cells, including cells relied on to recognize infections and mount targeted immune responses. Researchers believe they’ve now mapped a likely pathway for this damage, one that runs from specific brain regions, through the gut, and into the bone marrow itself.
This kind of stress has long been known to harm the heart, gut, and immune system, but scientists had not fully understood how stress-related brain activity could set off changes reaching the bone marrow. The study, published in Cell Stem Cell, points to a specific strain of gut bacteria as a key player in that chain.
How Chronic Stress Ages Blood Stem Cells
To trace how stress damages blood stem cells, researchers at Sun Yat-sen University used multiple mouse models mimicking different kinds of psychological stress, from chronic pain to repeated mild stressors. Across every model, the same pattern emerged: blood stem cells shrank in number, died at higher rates, and shifted toward producing one blood cell type over another.
Healthy blood stem cells generate a balanced mix of immune cells. Under stress, that balance tilted, favoring cells associated with inflammation while producing far fewer lymphoid cells. It’s the same shift scientists observe in animals as they naturally age, which is why the researchers see stress as pushing these cells toward old age before their time.
To confirm these weren’t superficial changes, the team transplanted blood stem cells from stressed mice into healthy mice. Those cells still performed poorly, unable to rebuild a healthy immune system in a new, unstressed body. The damage was baked into the cells themselves.

The Brain Regions That Matter
Using a technique that highlights which brain cells are actively firing, researchers identified two regions that went quiet under stress: the medial prefrontal cortex, which helps regulate emotion and decision-making, and the periaqueductal gray, which helps process pain and fear. Suppressing either region, through stress itself or a lab technique that flips neurons on and off with a specially designed drug, damaged blood stem cells the same way. Switching those regions back on in stressed mice let the cells recover.
Neural tracing and nerve-disruption experiments linked these brain regions to sympathetic nerve pathways that influence the small intestine, the same “fight or flight” system that speeds up a person’s heart during a scare. Surgically cutting the sympathetic nerve connection to the gut broke the chain, and the bone marrow effects disappeared. Cutting a separate major brain-gut line had no such protective effect.
The Gut Bacteria Connecting Stress to Immune Aging
Once stress signals arrived in the gut, they caused damage there too: the lining became inflamed, a protective cell type declined, and the intestinal environment shifted in ways that hurt the microbial community.
A strain of gut bacteria called Lactobacillus reuteri, already known to play roles in health, dropped significantly in stressed mice. This strain produces unusually high levels of spermidine, a naturally occurring molecule involved in cellular maintenance.
When spermidine dropped, blood stem cells lost their internal recycling system, which clears out damaged components inside the cell. Without that cleanup, toxic byproducts built up in the cells’ energy centers and triggered a specific type of cell death.
Giving stressed mice supplemental spermidine directly, or replenishing the gut with the L. reuteri strain that produces it, restored spermidine levels in the bone marrow and helped the blood stem cells bounce back. The cells recovered their ability to self-renew and their capacity to generate a healthier immune response. The researchers also ruled out the stress hormone system as the cause: blocking hormone-producing glands didn’t prevent the damage, pointing squarely at the gut-bacteria-spermidine pathway as the central mechanism.
What This Could Mean for Human Health
All of this work was done in mice, and researchers say further studies are needed to confirm that gut-bacteria-associated spermidine actually reaches the bone marrow and acts directly on stem cells there.
One detail adds weight to the findings: the same brain regions suppressed by stress showed reduced activity in naturally aged mice, which also had lower L. reuteri and spermidine levels, hinting that this pathway may overlap with normal aging.
If the chain holds up in human studies, it points to one gut bacterium and the compound spermidine as possible clues for protecting the immune system from the inside out.
Disclaimer: This article is based on findings from a mouse study and has not been tested in humans. It is intended for informational purposes and should not be taken as medical advice or a recommendation for any supplement or treatment. Anyone with health concerns related to chronic stress should speak with a qualified healthcare provider.
Paper Notes
Limitations
The authors explicitly note that isotope-labeled tracing experiments will be required to confirm whether bacteria-associated spermidine physically reaches the bone marrow and acts directly on blood stem cells. The researchers also acknowledge that spermidine supplementation did not fully reverse all aging-like changes in blood stem cells under stress conditions, indicating that additional, as-yet-unidentified mechanisms may contribute to stress-induced blood stem cell dysfunction, possibly through effects on other cell types or broader metabolic changes throughout the body. Additionally, all experimental work was conducted in mice, and it is not yet confirmed that the same brain-gut-bone marrow axis functions identically in humans.
Funding and Disclosures
The study’s acknowledgments credit support from the National Key Research and Development Program of China, the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project, the Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen, and the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Publication Details
Paper title: Psychological stress drives aging-like hematopoietic stem cell dysfunction through a brain-gut-bone marrow axis | Authors: Xiaobin Tian, Binghuo Wu, Keyue Yang, Ying Wang, Yishan Li, Jingjing Guan, Kaitao Wang, Yijun Zhao, Kexin Sun, Yanjun Ling, Jiayin Zheng, Mengyun Xie, Weiming Liu, Xiaojing Ye, Changzheng Li, Linjia Jiang, and Meng Zhao | Journal: Cell Stem Cell, Volume 33, Pages 1205-1222, July 2, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2026.05.012 | Corresponding authors: Linjia Jiang ([email protected]) and Meng Zhao ([email protected]), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China







