Woman in pain talking to doctor

Doctors are working on a rapid test to help diagnose endometriosis faster. (Photo by Drazen Zigic on Shutterstock)

In A Nutshell

  • Researchers developed a new lateral flow test using borophene, a 2D material, to detect HMGB-1, a potential biomarker for endometriosis.
  • The test works with menstrual blood, delivers results in 10 minutes, and showed a sixfold improvement in sensitivity over conventional methods.
  • Antibodies are UV-activated and precisely oriented on the borophene surface, improving detection accuracy without cross-reactivity from other blood proteins.
  • While tested only on spiked samples (not patient specimens), the method could pave the way for non-invasive, point-of-care screening in the future.

UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. — A groundbreaking new diagnostic technology could transform how doctors detect endometriosis, a painful condition that affects millions of women worldwide and often goes undiagnosed for years. Researchers have developed an ultra-sensitive menstrual blood test using a cutting-edge two-dimensional material called borophene. The material can detect disease markers at concentrations far lower than current methods, potentially offering a new path to earlier, less invasive diagnosis.

Endometriosis affects roughly 10% of reproductive-age women, causing severe pelvic pain, heavy bleeding, and in many cases, infertility. The condition occurs when tissue similar to the uterine lining grows outside the uterus, but current diagnostic methods often require invasive procedures or expensive imaging that may miss early-stage disease. The average delay in endometriosis diagnosis spans eight to 12 years, leaving countless women suffering without answers.

How Borophene Technology Works for Medical Testing

Borophene is a single-atom-thick sheet of boron atoms arranged in a honeycomb structure. This two-dimensional material belongs to a family of ultra-thin substances that includes graphene, but borophene offers unique properties that make it particularly suited for medical testing.

The innovation out of Pennsylvania State University centers around a lateral flow immunoassay — essentially an advanced version of a pregnancy test — that can identify HMGB-1, a protein marker associated with endometriosis, in menstrual blood. What sets this technology apart is how the antibodies (the molecules that detect specific targets) are attached to the borophene surface.

Traditional diagnostic tests often struggle with antibody orientation, meaning the detection molecules might not be positioned optimally to capture their targets. By exposing antibodies to ultraviolet light for just 30 seconds, researchers can break specific chemical bonds within the antibodies, creating reactive sites that form strong bonds with the borophene surface. This process ensures the antibodies are oriented correctly, with their detection regions exposed and ready to capture HMGB-1 proteins.

Test Sensitivity Results Show Major Improvement

The researchers tested their borophene-based assay using menstrual blood spiked with known concentrations of HMGB-1, rather than samples from actual endometriosis patients. Even so, the test proved highly sensitive: it detected the protein at concentrations as low as 40 picograms per milliliter. In contrast, conventional lateral flow tests only yielded results at 240 picograms per milliliter, indicating a sixfold improvement in detection sensitivity. While the paper does not use percentage figures, this represents a substantial advance in detection capability. And importantly, the test produces results in just 10 minutes, without requiring any lab equipment.

Specificity testing revealed another crucial advantage: the new assay showed no false positives when exposed to common blood proteins like albumin and fibrinogen, ensuring accurate results without interference from other substances naturally present in menstrual blood.

Clinical Applications for Women’s Health Diagnostics

Current endometriosis diagnosis often relies on laparoscopic surgery, a minimally invasive but still surgical procedure that requires general anesthesia. Less invasive alternatives like MRI or ultrasound may miss early-stage disease or require expensive equipment not available in all healthcare settings.

This rapid turnaround could enable point-of-care testing in doctors’ offices or even at-home screening, dramatically improving access to endometriosis detection. While not addressed directly in the paper, the simplicity and speed of the test raise the possibility that future iterations could be incorporated into menstrual products, allowing for discreet, at-home monitoring of endometriosis biomarkers, especially in areas with limited access to gynecological care.

The ability to use menstrual blood rather than requiring a separate blood draw offers additional advantages. Menstrual blood collection is non-invasive and can be performed privately, potentially increasing participation in screening programs. Research shows that delays in endometriosis diagnosis disproportionately affect women’s quality of life and reproductive health, with average diagnostic delays exceeding eight years in the United Kingdom and up to 12 years in the United States.

A simple, accurate test could help bridge these gaps, particularly in underserved communities where access to specialized gynecological care may be limited.

Moving from laboratory proof-of-concept to clinical application will require additional validation studies, including testing with actual patient samples and comparison to existing diagnostic methods. The study did not report data on long-term stability or storage conditions, which are key factors for future clinical translation. However, the relatively simple manufacturing requirements and use of established lateral flow technology could facilitate faster development compared to more complex diagnostic platforms. The research represents a significant step forward in personalized women’s health, offering hope for earlier detection and treatment of a condition that has historically been underdiagnosed and undertreated.

Disclaimer: This article summarizes findings from a laboratory-based proof-of-concept study. The test has not yet been validated with real patient samples or approved for clinical use. Claims about sensitivity and specificity are based on spiked menstrual blood models, not diagnostic trials. Speculative discussion about future applications (e.g. integration into menstrual products) is not presented by the authors but is offered here as a potential implication based on the technology’s design. Readers should not interpret this research as evidence of an available commercial diagnostic product.


Paper Summary

Methodology

Researchers synthesized borophene nanosheets by liquid-phase exfoliation of bulk boron powder in water using probe sonication for 10 hours. They functionalized the nanosheets with anti-HMGB-1 antibodies using a photoinduced immobilization technique, exposing antibodies to UV light for 30 seconds to create reactive thiol groups that bond with borophene. The team developed lateral flow immunoassays using these functionalized nanosheets and tested them with menstrual blood samples spiked with varying concentrations of HMGB-1 protein. Multiple characterization techniques including electron microscopy, spectroscopy, and calorimetry were used to validate the technology.

Results

The borophene-based lateral flow assay achieved a limit of detection of 40 picograms per milliliter for HMGB-1, compared to 240 picograms per milliliter for conventional assays. The test produced results within 10 minutes and showed no cross-reactivity with common blood proteins. Antibody orientation and binding were validated using multiple biochemical techniques.

Limitations

The study used artificially spiked menstrual blood samples rather than samples from actual endometriosis patients. Sample size was limited to laboratory validation studies without clinical trials. The research focused on a single biomarker (HMGB-1) and did not establish normal ranges for healthy individuals or diagnostic cutoffs. Stability and storage data for the test strips were not reported.

Funding and Disclosures

The research was supported by Pennsylvania State University, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Award 75D30122C15492), National Science Foundation (Award CBET 2153091/2229986), and Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program (Award TP210376). The authors declared no competing financial interests.

Publication Information

The study “Photoinduced Immobilization on Two-Dimensional Nano Borophene Spatially Orients Capture Antibody for Highly Sensitive Biological Interactions” was published in ACS Central Science on July 17, 2025 by Satheesh Natarajan, Ketan Dighe, Teresa Aditya, Pranay Saha, David Skrodzki, Purva Gupta, Nivetha Gunaseelan, Shraddha Krishnakumar, and Dipanjan Pan from Pennsylvania State University.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment