woman in lab holding vials

Photo by Julia Koblitz on Unsplash

CAMBRIDGE, England —  A new cancer drug could offer hope for patients with severe lung damage caused by COVID-19, scientists say. The drug, known as agenT-797, initially developed for cancer treatment, has shown promise in treating acute respiratory disease syndrome (ARDS), a critical condition that impairs lung function, often seen in serious COVID-19 cases.

In a study involving 20 patients with severe ARDS due to COVID-19, all of whom required mechanical ventilation, agenT-797 induced an anti-inflammatory response, potentially aiding the immune system in combating the infection. Remarkably, 70% of the trial participants survived 30 days post-treatment, a significant improvement compared to a 10% survival rate in a control group.

Patients receiving the highest dose of agenT-797 exhibited an 80% lower risk of developing bacterial pneumonia compared to those given the lowest dose. The research highlights that agenT-797 revitalizes ‘exhausted’ T cells and promotes an anti-inflammatory effect that enhances anti-viral immunity, leading to reduced lung inflammation.

“During this small, exploratory study we observed that MiNK’s iNKT (invariant natural killer T) cell treatment, which is also being advanced for people with cancer, triggered an anti-inflammatory response in ARDS patients,” Professor Justin Stebbing, the study’s lead author and a professor of Biomedical Sciences at Anglia Ruskin University (ARU), in a university release. “Despite a poor prognosis, critically ill patients treated with this therapy showed favorable mortality rates and those treated at the highest dose also had reduced rates of pneumonia, underscoring the potential application of iNKT cells, and agenT-797 in particular, in treating viral diseases and infections more broadly.”

Picture of body with lungs
Researchers say there was an 80% lower instance of bacterial pneumonia among patients who received the highest dosage of agenT-797, compared to those who received fewer cells. (Credit: Kalhh on Pixabay)

The trial is believed to be the first immune cell therapy used on critically ill patients who needed a special lung support treatment called veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). The results are promising, with 80% of these patients surviving for up to 90 days, and 60% still alive after 120 days.

“These published findings reinforce the unique power and potential of iNKT cells to mitigate severe acute respiratory distress,” concludes Dr. Marc van Dijk, Chief Scientific Officer at MiNK and co-author of the study. “The data demonstrate agenT-797’s encouraging survival benefit, ability to help clear secondary infections, and tolerable administration in ventilated patients and those on VV-ECMO support.”

The study is published in the journal Nature Communications.

South West News Service writer Imogen Howse contributed to this report.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment

1 Comment

  1. Diana says:

    Is it effective for copd?