ventilation

Dmitrii Shirnin For Unsplash+

In A Nutshell

  • A 2020 COVID-19 outbreak in a Spanish apartment building infected 15 people across four vertically stacked units, all connected by a shared bathroom ventilation duct, with no direct contact between households identified.
  • Researchers found that the duct likely carried infectious air particles between floors, with kitchen exhaust fans making the problem significantly worse by creating pressure imbalances that pulled air backward through the system.
  • Apartments whose residents had already installed exhaust fans with non-return flaps, or had covered their bathroom vents entirely, reported zero infections during the outbreak.
  • Researchers recommend retrofitting older buildings with forced exhaust fans fitted with non-return flaps, and say public health officials should scrutinize shared ventilation ducts when COVID-19 or similar respiratory illness cases cluster vertically in residential buildings.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, people scrubbed their groceries, masked up in hallways, and avoided neighbors in pursuit of safety. But a cluster of cases in a Spanish apartment building suggests the real danger may have been lurking in a far less suspected place: the shared air shaft behind the bathroom wall.

In the summer of 2020, fifteen people across four apartments in a seven-story building in Santander, Spain, tested positive for COVID-19, during a stretch when the city of roughly 172,000 people had recorded nearly zero new cases in the wider community. No direct contact between residents of different households was identified. Surface samples from common areas like elevators and hallways came back negative. Yet the virus spread anyway, in a specific pattern: every infected apartment was stacked vertically, one on top of another, all connected by the same shared bathroom ventilation duct running from the basement to the roof.

A study published in PLOS One pieced together what happened, using air pressure measurements, computer simulations, genetic analysis of the virus, and real-world data from the building. Researchers concluded the most plausible transmission route was the building’s own ventilation system, specifically a shared bathroom exhaust duct that may have allowed infectious air particles to travel between floors and into neighboring apartments.

A 1969 Building’s Outdated Bathroom Duct Design May Have Sealed Residents’ Fate

The investigation might never have happened if not for one resident, David Higuera, an engineer living in the building and a co-author of the study, who noticed the cases on his floor weren’t random. When a second apartment directly above the first tested positive, the vertical pattern became impossible to ignore. What followed was an international research effort involving professors and students from four universities: the University of Colorado Boulder, Concordia University in Montreal, the University of Valencia, and the University of Cantabria in Spain.

Constructed in 1969, the building predates modern building codes in Spain. Each apartment had a single interior bathroom with no windows, ventilated by a small opening in the wall near the ceiling. That opening connected to a shared vertical duct running through the building to the roof, shared by pairs of apartments. Originally, the design relied on warm air naturally rising to carry bathroom odors and humidity upward and out. That system has a flaw: under certain conditions, air can reverse direction entirely, flowing back down into apartments rather than up and out.

air infographic
A Spanish apartment building’s shared bathroom duct may have spread COVID between floors, a new study suggests. (Image by StudyFinds)

Cooking Dinner May Have Drawn Viral Particles from a Sick Neighbor’s Apartment

Researchers conducted five rounds of measurements inside a fourth-floor apartment between May and December 2022, tracking air pressure, airflow speed, carbon dioxide levels, temperature, and humidity. Carbon dioxide, exhaled with every breath, served as a stand-in for where air was actually going. In a properly functioning exhaust system, carbon dioxide levels in an empty apartment should stay low. Researchers repeatedly detected elevated carbon dioxide in the empty bathroom, a sign that air from other apartments was flowing backward through the duct.

Conditions worsened when a kitchen exhaust fan was running. When a kitchen hood pulls air out at high speed, it creates a pressure imbalance that can draw air in from wherever it can find it, including through the bathroom duct. Measurements showed running the kitchen fan on its highest setting dramatically increased the amount of air reversing into the bathroom.

Computer models confirmed the pattern. One simulation tracked airflow and carbon dioxide movement between two vertically connected bathrooms. When the kitchen exhaust fan was running, airflow into the upper bathroom was significantly stronger than when a window was simply left open. A larger model simulated the entire building across multiple floors, tracking how infectious particles moved under different conditions, including varying wind direction, window placement, bathroom fan use, and kitchen hood operation.

In scenarios where a fourth-floor resident ran their kitchen exhaust fan, the model showed it pulled air upward from the third floor, where the index cases lived. When a third-floor bathroom fan ran simultaneously, particles were also pushed downward into lower floors. Everyday household routines may have been moving viral particles between units in ways no resident could have anticipated.

Apartments with Modified Vents Reported No Infections During COVID Outbreak

Perhaps the most telling evidence was who didn’t get sick. Among the 10 other homes sharing the same vertical duct or patio area, some were unoccupied and others had already modified their bathroom ventilation before the outbreak. Three of those homes had installed individual exhaust fans fitted with a flap that closes automatically when the fan is off, blocking air from flowing backward. A fourth had its bathroom exhaust opening covered entirely. None of those four apartments reported infections. The apartments that lacked such modifications were the ones affected.

Virus sequencing added another layer of evidence. Genetic analysis of samples from three infected residents found their sequences nearly identical, differing from one another by only one or two points in the genome, while differing from the closest sample collected elsewhere in the city by at least eleven points. That similarity points toward a single shared source rather than multiple independent introductions.

Based on their findings, researchers recommended installing forced exhaust fans with non-return flaps in bathroom ducts, noting the fans are generally inexpensive and can be retrofitted into existing buildings. Public health officials, they added, should treat shared ventilation infrastructure as a priority when cases cluster vertically in residential buildings.

While the world debated masks, hand sanitizer, and six-foot distancing, a building’s own hidden ventilation may have been moving the virus floor by floor, bathroom by bathroom, through a duct most residents never thought about.


Disclaimer: This article is based on a single case study of one residential building and should not be interpreted as proof that shared bathroom ventilation ducts routinely spread COVID-19 or other respiratory illnesses. Researchers identified the duct as the most plausible transmission route, but could not fully rule out other pathways. Readers with concerns about ventilation in their own buildings are encouraged to consult a qualified building engineer or public health professional.


Paper Notes

Limitations

Environmental measurements were only possible in one apartment, the fourth-floor unit, because residents of other apartments did not grant access. Airflow behavior may differ on lower floors due to variations in pressure driven by height. Computer models, while validated against available measurements, are based on simplifying assumptions, including well-mixed rooms, steady-state airflow, and a fixed six-hour exposure window. Researchers also note that the number of scenarios they could test was limited, meaning other conditions were not examined. Whether some unaffected apartments had pre-existing immunity from earlier COVID-19 exposure was not confirmed. Other transmission routes could not be fully ruled out, though the evidence pointed strongly toward the bathroom ventilation duct.

Funding and Disclosures

According to the paper, the authors received no specific funding for this work. No competing interests were declared.

Publication Details

Paper Title: Potential airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 through bathroom ventilation ducts associated with an outbreak in a residential building in Santander, Spain, 2020 | Authors: Shelly L. Miller, Shujie Yan, Alberto García, Liangzhu Leon Wang, Zhiqiang Zhai, Jose Ramon Aranda, Fernando González-Candelas, Ignacio Lombillo, Javier Balbás, Ernesto Cabrillo, Delfín Silió, and L. David Higuera | Affiliations: University of Colorado Boulder; Concordia University, Montreal; Universidad de Cantabria; Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research / University of Valencia – CSIC; Higuera Engineering Technical Office, Santander | Journal: PLOS One | Published: May 12, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345041

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment