Tersicoccus phoenicis study

A bacterial species, Tersicoccus phoenicis, found in spacecraft clean rooms can survive intensive antimicrobial cleaning by going dormant. (Credit: University of Houston)

Scientists discover spacecraft microbes can enter dormancy to evade detection, raising planetary contamination concerns.

In A Nutshell

  • The clean-room bacterium Tersicoccus phoenicis can enter dormancy, remaining alive but undetectable.
  • NASA’s current spore-based tests may miss these dormant cells.
  • A protein called Rpf can “wake” the bacteria even after a week of drying.
  • The findings could reshape spacecraft cleaning and planetary-protection protocols.

HOUSTON — Houston has found a problem. NASA’s clean rooms, where spacecraft bound for Mars are assembled, might harbor stealthy stowaways. Scientists have discovered that a bacterium living in these ultra-sterile facilities can essentially play dead to survive brutal cleaning protocols that would kill most life forms.

Tersicoccus phoenicis was first isolated from the floor of a spacecraft assembly facility at Kennedy Space Center. Researchers at the University of Houston have now shown that when this microbe faces nutrient starvation or drying conditions, it enters a state where cells remain alive but won’t grow on the standard lab plates used to detect contamination.

Within just two days of air-drying, the bacterium’s detectable population plummeted by more than 99.9%. After a week, only one to four cells out of millions could be recovered using conventional methods. Yet these cells weren’t dead. When scientists added a special protein to their growth medium, the bacteria sprang back to life.

A bacterial species, Tersicoccus phoenicis, found in spacecraft clean rooms can survive intensive antimicrobial cleaning by going dormant.
A bacterial species, Tersicoccus phoenicis, found in spacecraft clean rooms can survive intensive antimicrobial cleaning by going dormant. (Credit: University of Houston)

Why Dormant Bacteria Threaten Planetary Protection

Space missions headed to potentially life-harboring destinations like Mars, Jupiter’s moon Europa, or Saturn’s moon Enceladus must follow strict planetary protection protocols to avoid contaminating other worlds with Earth life.

Spacecraft assembly clean rooms employ extreme measures: strictly controlled temperatures, filtered air circulation, limited humidity, continuous chemical disinfectants, and ultraviolet radiation. Despite these efforts, microbial communities persist. Most are spore-forming Bacillus species that have long been the focus of planetary protection efforts.

But Tersicoccus phoenicis doesn’t form spores. It belongs to a group called Actinobacteria, organisms repeatedly identified in spacecraft clean rooms for both the OSIRIS-REx and Mars 2020 missions. Their survival mechanisms remained poorly understood until now.

Current detection protocols, particularly NASA’s standard spore assay, target spore-forming bacteria. Dormant cells of non-spore formers like Tersicoccus could slip through undetected, present but uncountable using standard techniques.

How Scientists Discovered the Dormancy Trick

To understand how Tersicoccus survives, the research team grew the bacteria in nutrient-poor conditions that mimic the starvation environment of a clean room. Cultivable cell counts peaked at 50 million cells per milliliter between days one and two, then crashed to fewer than 100 cells per milliliter by day five.

Yet cell mass stayed roughly constant through day six. The cells were still there; they simply wouldn’t grow when plated.

Reviving these dormant cells required a protein called resuscitation-promoting factor, or Rpf. The researchers used Rpf from a related bacterium called Micrococcus luteus, which they produced in E. coli. When they added this Rpf to cultures of dormant Tersicoccus, the bacteria’s lag phase before growth resumed shortened dramatically (from 58 hours down to 31 hours).

Notably, Tersicoccus appears specially adapted to clean room stress. After 48 hours of air-drying, Tersicoccus showed a millionfold reduction in cultivability, while a close relative that isn’t from a clean room showed only a tenfold decrease over the same period.

William Widger, Madhan R Tirumalai, and Sahar Ali pose for a portrait in a lab at Science Center. A bacterial species, Tersicoccus phoenicis, found in spacecraft clean rooms can survive intensive antimicrobial cleaning by going dormant.
William Widger, Madhan R Tirumalai, and Sahar Ali pose for a portrait in a lab at Science Center. A bacterial species, Tersicoccus phoenicis, found in spacecraft clean rooms can survive intensive antimicrobial cleaning by going dormant. (Credit: University of Houston)

Reviving Bacteria After a Week of Drying

Researchers found that Rpf concentration directly affected how quickly dormant cells could restart growth. Higher concentrations meant shorter lag times. Without any Rpf, Tersicoccus showed almost no growth in minimal nutrients even after 83 hours. With Rpf present, the same cells grew normally.

Cells that had been air-dried for seven days could still be revived. When resuspended with Rpf from M. luteus, these desiccated cells recovered, though they needed about 31 hours to begin growing again compared to 50 hours without the protein.

Researchers also observed that Tersicoccus cells suspended in plain water for 48 hours showed signs of entering dormancy even without drying, with a thousandfold reduction in cultivable cells. This bacterium can shift into survival mode rapidly when conditions turn unfavorable.

What This Means for Future NASA Missions

If actinobacterial strains in spacecraft facilities routinely enter dormancy under stress, they could persist undetected despite extensive cleaning procedures. Current methods that rely on culturing bacteria on agar plates would miss these dormant populations entirely.

Clean rooms for spacecraft assembly have low but persistent microbial loads. Only a small fraction is cultivable using standard techniques. Dormancy may explain why the uncultivable portion has been such a challenge for planetary protection measures.

Several other bacterial isolates from spacecraft clean rooms are already known to survive drying, vacuum, and even proton irradiation. Related bacteria have been found on the International Space Station and on crew spacesuits.

Whether dormancy is common among clean room bacteria remains to be determined. The researchers note that combining standard cultivation methods with newer molecular techniques might help detect dormant cells that would otherwise remain invisible.

Another possibility: enriching growth media with resuscitation-promoting factors might allow recovery of bacteria that would otherwise remain dormant and undetectable, revealing the true extent of microbial contamination in spacecraft assembly facilities.

Tersicoccus phoenicis serves as a reminder that life finds ways to persist even in humanity’s most carefully controlled environments. As NASA plans future missions to Mars and beyond, understanding these survival strategies becomes increasingly important. The goal of planetary protection is ensuring that any life discovered on other worlds is genuinely alien, not a tenacious stowaway from Earth.

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not represent NASA policy or professional advice.

Paper Summary

Methodology

Researchers obtained Tersicoccus phoenicis strain 1P05MAT, originally isolated from Kennedy Space Center’s spacecraft assembly clean room floor, and studied its ability to enter dormancy. They grew the bacteria in acetate minimal media (a nutrient-limited environment) and tracked both colony-forming units (cultivable cells) and optical density (total cell mass) over time. To test desiccation survival, they air-dried cell suspensions on sterile plates for up to seven days and attempted to recover them. The team also cloned and overexpressed the resuscitation-promoting factor gene from Micrococcus luteus in E. coli, using the resulting crude lysate at various dilutions to test whether it could revive dormant Tersicoccus cells. Growth experiments were conducted in 24-well microtiter plates with automated optical density measurements every 15 minutes.

Results

When grown in minimal media, Tersicoccus phoenicis showed peak cultivable cell counts of 50 million per milliliter on days one to two, declining by more than 99.999% by day five and exceeding 99.99999% decline by day eight. However, optical density remained stable through day six, indicating the cells were present but uncultivable (a pattern characteristic of the viable but not culturable state). After 48 hours of air-drying, cultivability dropped by 99.9%, from 3.4 million colony-forming units down to just one to four detectable cells. Tersicoccus reached this million-fold reduction far faster than M. luteus, which required seven days of drying for similar decline. Adding resuscitation-promoting factor dramatically shortened the lag phase before growth resumed. In minimal media without Rpf, Tersicoccus showed negligible growth even after 83 hours, but with undiluted Rpf, the lag phase shortened to approximately 22 hours. The effect was dose-dependent, with higher Rpf concentrations producing faster recovery. Even cells dried for seven days could be revived with Rpf, though they required longer lag phases of about 31 hours compared to 50 hours without the protein.

Limitations

The study used a crude lysate containing Rpf rather than purified protein, which prevented precise dose-dependent interpretation of the protein’s activity. The researchers estimated Rpf concentration at approximately 1 micromolar based on densitometry analysis, but acknowledged this could be an underestimate. Most experiments were conducted with single replicates initially, though key results were confirmed with triplicate experiments. The study focused solely on one strain of Tersicoccus phoenicis from Kennedy Space Center and one type strain of M. luteus, limiting conclusions about whether other actinobacterial clean room isolates exhibit similar dormancy patterns. Cell morphology showed no discernible changes between exponential and dormant states, but more detailed microscopic analysis might reveal subtle differences. Alternative explanations such as persistence or cellular injury cannot be entirely ruled out, though the resuscitation phenomenon strongly supports dormancy interpretation. While the study simulated some clean room conditions like desiccation and nutrient starvation, it did not test exposure to chemical disinfectants or other sterilization procedures used in spacecraft facilities.

Funding and Disclosures

This work was supported by National Science Foundation Award NSF-MCB-EAGER 2227347 to Madhan Tirumalai and George E. Fox, and by the University of Houston’s Drug Discovery Institute Seed Grant awarded to William Widger, Madhan Tirumalai, and George E. Fox. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Publication Detail

Tirumalai, M., Ali, S., Fox, G.E., and Widger, W. (2025). “Tersicoccus phoenicis (Actinobacteria), a spacecraft clean room isolate, exhibits dormancy,” published in Microbiology Spectrum, Volume 13, Issue 9. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.01692-25. Available online August 11, 2025. The paper underwent open peer review, with reviewers including Dr. Parag Vaishampayan from NASA Ames Research Center Space Biosciences Division and Dr. Aaron Regberg from NASA Johnson Space Center Planetary Protection.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment