A women uncertain about having kids

Uncertainty about having children contributes to dropping birth rates. (pathdoc/Shutterstock)

In a nutshell

  • Up to 50% of U.S. women who say they want children are unsure they’ll follow through, revealing deep uncertainty behind stated fertility intentions.
  • Nearly 1 in 4 childless women who claim to want kids say they wouldn’t be particularly bothered if they never became mothers, and that share is growing.
  • Women who feel more certain and strongly about having children tend to plan for more kids and expect to have them sooner, suggesting that emotional ambivalence may be contributing to falling birth rates.

COLUMBUS, Ohio â€” The math doesn’t add up. American women keep telling surveys they want kids at roughly the same rates they always have, yet birth rates continue plummeting. When scientists dug deeper into what women really think about motherhood, they discovered a massive gap between intention and genuine desire.

New research from The Ohio State University examining fertility goals among American women reveals a startling disconnect between what women say they want and how they actually feel about having children. The study, which tracked responses from over 41,000 women between 2002 and 2018, found that up to 50% of women who say they intend to have children are actually uncertain whether they’ll follow through on those plans. Also, up to 25% of childless women who claim they want kids admit they wouldn’t be particularly bothered if they never had any.

This could help explain why U.S. birth rates have been steadily declining since the Great Recession, even when women’s stated intentions to have children have remained relatively stable.

The research, published in the journal Genus, identifies what researchers call “multiple dimensions of uncertainty” in fertility goals. This refers to the complex and often contradictory feelings women have about motherhood that don’t show up in traditional surveys asking simple yes-or-no questions about wanting children.

A woman lost in thought
Just because a woman says she wants to have kids doesn’t mean she will follow through. (fizkes/Shutterstock)

Researchers analyzed data from the National Survey of Family Growth, the most comprehensive fertility survey in the United States. Rather than just looking at whether women wanted children, they dug deeper into three types of uncertainty that reveal the messy reality of reproductive decision-making.

First, women with “goal uncertainty” literally don’t know if they want children or not. This group was surprisingly small, representing only about 2% of respondents across all survey years. The survey design likely underestimated this number since it didn’t explicitly offer “don’t know” as an option for fertility intentions.

Another group included women with “realization uncertainty,” who say they want children but doubt they’ll actually have them. Among women who intended to have children, about 7% said they were “not at all sure” they would follow through, while roughly 36% said they were only “somewhat sure.” That means 43% of women with stated baby plans had doubts about making them a reality.

The third dimension was “intensity of goals.” Among childless women who said they wanted children, nearly one in four indicated they would be only “a little bothered” or “not at all bothered” if they never became mothers. This percentage actually increased over the study period, rising from 18% in 2002 to 26% in 2018.

Young Women Leading the Trend

The data revealed that uncertainty isn’t evenly distributed across all women. Young women aged 15-29 showed the most dramatic shifts in attitudes. While older women (30-44) maintained relatively stable levels of uncertainty throughout the study period, younger women became increasingly unsure about both achieving their fertility goals and feeling strongly about them.

This trend was pronounced among childless women. In 2002, 17% of childless women between 15 and 29 reported weak feelings about having children, compared to 27% of those between 30 and 44. By 2018, those numbers had essentially flipped, with 26% of younger women reporting weak intentions compared to 25% of older women.

Women with college degrees and higher incomes were generally more certain about both wanting children and believing they could achieve those goals. However, even highly educated women showed declining certainty in recent years, with the proportion of college-educated women who were “very sure” about having children dropping from 65% in 2014 to 54% in 2018.

When Uncertainty Translates to Fewer Kids

Uncertainty affects actual family planning decisions. Women who were more certain about wanting children and felt more intensely about those goals reported wanting more children overall and planning to have them sooner.

Childless women who were “very sure” about meeting their intentions planned to have an average of 2.4 children, while those who were “not at all sure” planned for just 1.9 children. Similarly, women with intense feelings about wanting children intended to have 2.3 children compared to 2.1 for those with weaker motivations. While you can’t actually have 2.4 kids, these averages reflect the mathematical mean across all women in each group—some wanting one child, others wanting three or four.

About 19% of women who were “very sure” about their fertility goals planned to have their next child within two years, compared to just 9% of those who were “not at all sure.” Women with intense desires for children were also more likely to plan shorter timeframes for starting their families.

Economic Upheaval

The study period captured a crucial moment in American demographic history, spanning the years before, during, and after the Great Recession. While some fertility trends clearly shifted after 2008, the relationship between economic uncertainty and reproductive uncertainty proved more complex than researchers initially expected.

Family planning concept with a piggy bank
Some decisions not to have children are based on the state of the economy. (LookerStudio/Shutterstock)

Overall uncertainty levels remained relatively stable throughout this period of economic upheaval. However, specific subgroups showed changes. Starting around 2008, childless women, younger women, and unpartnered women all showed declining intentions to have children. More recently, highly educated women have also begun showing reduced fertility intentions.

America’s Future

Declining birth rates may not be simply about women wanting fewer children, but rather about the growing gap between what women think they should want and what they actually feel capable of achieving or motivated to pursue.

Factors like economic instability, concerns about healthcare access, and ongoing social disruption may be creating an environment where even women who say they want children struggle to commit fully to that goal.

Research suggests that if substantial numbers of women remain uncertain about achieving their fertility goals and an increasing proportion feel only lukewarm about pursuing them, birth rates are likely to continue falling regardless of what women say they want in surveys.

Paper Summary

Methodology

Researchers analyzed data from the National Survey of Family Growth, a nationally representative survey conducted by the CDC, using responses from 41,492 women aged 15-44 collected between 2002 and 2019. The study focused on three dimensions of fertility uncertainty: goal uncertainty (not knowing if you want children), realization uncertainty (doubting you’ll achieve your stated goals), and intensity of goals (how strongly you feel about wanting children). Researchers used statistical weights to ensure the sample was nationally representative and examined trends over time while controlling for factors like age, education, income, and partnership status.

Results

The study found that only about 2% of women reported being uncertain about their fertility goals, but up to 50% of women who said they wanted children were uncertain about actually having them. Additionally, 23% of childless women who claimed to want children said they wouldn’t be bothered if they didn’t have any, and this percentage increased to 26% by 2018. Women who were more certain about their goals planned to have more children (2.4 vs. 1.9) and have them sooner. Younger women and those with less education showed the highest levels of uncertainty, while college-educated women became less certain over time.

Limitations

The study was limited by the survey questions available in the National Survey of Family Growth, which likely underestimated goal uncertainty since “don’t know” wasn’t explicitly offered as a response option for fertility intentions. Research was also restricted to women only due to limitations in how men’s fertility goals were measured in the survey. Additionally, the study couldn’t directly measure macro-level economic uncertainty or include detailed psychological measures that might explain the uncertainty patterns observed.

Funding and Disclosures

This research was supported by funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development to the Institute for Population Research at Ohio State University (P2C HD058484) and to the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (P2C HD050924). Authors reported no competing financial interests.

Publication Information

The paper “Multiple dimensions of uncertainty in fertility goals: recent trends and patterns in the United States” is authored by Badolato, L., Hayford, S.R. & Guzzo, K.B. It was published in Genus (81, 14) in June 2025.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply