Reconstruction of the extinct Herugavialis cairensis with the Great Sphinx and pyramids depicted in the background. Artwork by Karim Zanaty.
CT Scans Give Ancient Egyptian Crocodile a New Name and a New Place on the Family Tree
In A Nutshell
- A crocodile skull from Egypt’s Mokattam Formation, the same rock formation the Great Sphinx was carved from, sat in a German museum for nearly a century under the wrong name.
- CT scans, bone comparisons, and a computer analysis show the fossil is not a close relative of the endangered false gharial, so it now has a new name, Herugavialis cairensis.
- Telescoped eye sockets and a blunt brain peak, a feature not seen in any other gharial relative, help set it apart.
- Gharial-like crocodiles vanish from the Mediterranean fossil record for millions of years, which may reflect a real decline or partly missing fossils.
A crocodile skull collected east of Cairo, from the same rock formation the Great Sphinx was carved from, sat in a German museum for nearly a century under the wrong name. Its label tied it to the false gharial, a long-snouted, endangered crocodile that survives today in Southeast Asia. A new analysis says that label was wrong, and the fossil now carries a new name, Herugavialis.
A study in Royal Society Open Science centers on that skull, which came from Egypt’s Mokattam Formation, a marine limestone laid down more than 40 million years ago. A researcher named Müller called it Tomistoma cairense in 1927, grouping it with the false gharial because of similarities he noticed. Only the genus, the broader group a species is filed under, has changed. The species name survives with a small spelling change, now cairensis, paired with Herugavialis, a nod to Heru, the Egyptian god also known as Horus, who is often linked to the Sphinx.
Beyond the renaming, the study maps out gharial-like crocodiles that once lived in and around the ancient Mediterranean, then dropped out of the fossil record for millions of years before eventually returning.
Ancient Crocodile Skull Stayed Undescribed While Similar Fossils Were Reclassified
Other fossils got the same treatment. Scientists lumped many extinct crocodiles from Europe, Africa, and Asia into Tomistoma because they resembled the false gharial. Recent family-tree analyses, which compare physical traits across species to map who is related to whom, showed that most of these fossils sat far from the false gharial. Some have since been moved into different genera. The same analyses flagged the Egyptian skull as a poor fit, yet it kept the name, its anatomy undescribed since 1927.
A team of six researchers from the United Kingdom, Sweden, Germany, Egypt, and the United States took a fresh look. The starting point was the original skull, a long, narrow-snouted specimen held at a museum in Stuttgart, Germany, along with several other specimens Müller assigned to the species, including pieces of jaw, all collected at the same Egyptian site. The researchers compared bone shapes with other gharial relatives, especially two Egyptian species of similar age. A micro-CT scanner, which stacks many X-ray images into a 3D model, let the team look inside the skull without damaging it. One of those Egyptian species got a 3D surface scan for comparison.
CT Scans Show Ancient Crocodile Had Telescoped Eye Sockets, Blunt Brain Peak
Differences from those Egyptian species started with the eyes. Herugavialis had eye sockets with strongly raised rims, a shape paleontologists call “telescoped.” Both Egyptian species have raised edges around the eye too, but not telescoped ones.
Inside the skull, CT data showed a blunt peak on a digital mold of the brain cavity, a feature the authors say has not been seen in any other gharial relative. A few more distant crocodile relatives do have one.
In a computer analysis that scored 331 physical features across 152 crocodile types, living and extinct, Herugavialis did not group with the false gharial in either of the two versions the team ran. It also stayed apart from other African and Mediterranean fossils, including the Egyptian species scanned for comparison, despite coming from roughly the same time and place. Instead, it landed on a relatively early branch of the line leading to the living Indian gharial. Its exact spot is less certain, since earlier studies have placed it differently, but the separation from the false gharial held up. That consistency was enough for the team to formally name a new genus.
Mediterranean Crocodile Fossils Vanish for Millions of Years
Placing Herugavialis alongside its relatives showed how varied the region’s gharial family was. Unlike today’s freshwater false gharial, these extinct relatives frequented coastal and shallow sea waters. Between about 66 and 34 million years ago, researchers count at least six gharial relatives from what is now Morocco, Egypt, and Italy. Starting roughly 20 million years ago, at least six more are known from Egypt, Libya, Austria, Malta, Portugal, and Italy.
In between, across most or possibly all of a stretch called the Oligocene, roughly 34 to 23 million years ago, no gharial relatives turn up anywhere in the Mediterranean. The authors say the gap could partly reflect sampling bias, meaning too few digs or poorly preserved sites. They also see evidence from the family tree that it may be a real decline, possibly tied to global cooling and falling sea levels that shrank the coastal habitat these crocodiles needed. Warmer conditions and rising seas may later have allowed a rebound.
By about 5 million years ago, gharial relatives had vanished from the region entirely. The authors say a major episode called the Messinian Salinity Crisis, when the Mediterranean largely dried out, may have played a role.
Filing a fossil under a familiar modern name made the Mediterranean’s crocodile story look smaller than it was. Herugavialis is one correction, and the authors note that other Mediterranean species still need the same re-evaluation before that history can be told straight.
Paper Notes
Limitations
Several specimens assigned to Herugavialis cairensis are incompletely preserved, and damage to skull surfaces makes the seams between bones hard to identify in places. Some jaw bones, the surangular and angular, are not preserved in any known specimen and could not be scored in the analysis, which means the fossil was scored for 126 of 331 physical features. The inner ear structure, called the endosseous labyrinth, could not be reconstructed in the main skull because of low scan quality in that region. For Paratomistoma courti, the brain cast was only partially segmented because of incomplete preservation, so certain measurements could not be estimated. The family-tree analysis relied on physical traits alone, and the authors note that the exact placement of Herugavialis within the gharial group has been unstable across studies. They also acknowledge that the Oligocene gap in Mediterranean gharial-type fossils might partly reflect sampling bias, though they argue other evidence supports a real decline. The links between that decline, global cooling, falling sea levels, and the Messinian Salinity Crisis are proposed explanations rather than demonstrated causes.
Funding and Disclosures
Paul M. J. Burke is supported by the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation. Stephan N. F. Spiekman is supported by the DFG Emmy Noether Programme. Philip D. Mannion’s research was supported by funding from The Royal Society and NERC. The authors declare no competing interests and state that no AI-assisted technologies were used in creating the article.
Publication Details
Titled “Cranial anatomy of the Middle Eocene Egyptian crocodylian Herugavialis cairensis provides new insights into gavialoid diversity in the Mediterranean region,” the paper was written by Paul M. J. Burke, Stephan N. F. Spiekman, Belal S. Salem, Sara Saber, Hesham M. Sallam, and Philip D. Mannion. It appeared in Royal Society Open Science, volume 13, issue 10, article 261173, on October 7, 2026, after being received on June 10, 2026, and accepted on July 31, 2026. The DOI is https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.261173. Author affiliations include University College London, the Swedish Museum of Natural History (Naturhistoriska riksmuseet) in Stockholm, the Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, the University of Hohenheim, Mansoura University, Ohio University, Benha University, and Assiut University.







