Doctor smiling and talking with patient

(Photo by PeopleImages.com - Yuri A on Shutterstock)

In A Nutshell

  • Patients trust doctors with health data; 60% are uneasy with government access.
  • People want digital convenience, delivered through their providers.
  • Near term, many expect instant results, biometric check-in, and AI note-taking.
  • Today, most still call the office or search the web, not AI chats, for answers.

NEW YORK — Sixty percent of Americans are uncomfortable with the government having access to their health data and medical history, according to a new survey that reveals a striking trust gap in healthcare privacy.

The finding comes from a Talker Research poll of 2,000 U.S. adults who visited a doctor within the past year. While patients overwhelmingly trust their healthcare providers with sensitive medical information, government access to the same data makes most people uneasy.

The survey paints a picture of selective trust. More than four in five respondents (83%) said they trust their healthcare provider and the information they share. When asked specifically about data access, 92% feel comfortable letting their primary care doctors see their health information, and 88% are fine with specialty doctors having access.

Medical staff at doctors’ offices also rank high on the trust scale, with 85% of respondents comfortable sharing their information with them. But that comfort level drops sharply when it comes to entities outside the exam room.

Who Patients Trust Least With Their Health Records

Government agencies top the list of uncomfortable data handlers at 60%, followed by AI chatbots at 47%. Even medical technology device companies make more than a third of patients (36%) uncomfortable when it comes to handling health information.

That discomfort becomes even clearer when patients consider who should deliver their medical information. Eighty-eight percent said they’d feel most comfortable receiving medical information directly from their doctor. Only 3% would be comfortable getting the same information from an AI chatbot or platform.

“This research shows that patients aren’t afraid of innovation — they simply want assurance that technology is used responsibly to improve their care,” said Kyle Barich, chief marketing officer at PatientPoint, which commissioned the study. “What’s striking is how much trust they continue to place in their doctors to deliver that personalized experience.”

Doctor talking to male patient
Most patients prefer to have their medical information and decisions stay with (and come from) their doctor, and only their doctor. (© Pixel-Shot – stock.adobe.com)

Patients Want Modern Healthcare on Their Terms

Despite privacy concerns, patients aren’t rejecting digital innovation outright. Two-thirds believe having a digitally advanced healthcare practice would improve their experience during doctor visits. Half think new technology would make their healthcare better overall.

Survey respondents defined “modern” doctor’s offices by features like appointment reminders via text or email (71%), patient portal access (63%), and online scheduling (53%). Digital health records and updated waiting areas with phone chargers and educational screens also made the list.

Nearly half of respondents (45%) said they’re more likely to trust a digitally advanced doctor’s office over one that isn’t. Yet the human element remains central to patient comfort and decision-making.

Six percent of Americans feel like they’re walking “backwards in time” 14 years whenever they have a doctor’s appointment, though 76% believe their doctor’s office already feels up-to-date.

How Doctor Visits Will Change

Looking ahead five to ten years, patients envision new ways to access care (52%), more accurate health-tracking wearables (46%), and additional physical locations for receiving care (43%). Personalized care experiences ranked high at 42%.

More than half (53%) believe scheduling appointments without speaking to a person will become standard practice. Forty-five percent expect instant test results, and 39% anticipate checking in via facial recognition or biometrics. Another 37% think AI will become standard for diagnoses and note-taking, while an equal percentage expect personalized medication based on medical history and genetics.

But when health concerns arise right now, patients still lean on traditional resources. Search engines lead at 32%, followed closely by calling the doctor’s office at 31%. Medical information websites come in third at 26%. AI chatbots barely register, with only 5% using them to research symptoms.

Two-thirds of patients said they’d feel comfortable sharing medical information to receive personalized health messages about treatment options, medications, or health-focused products. That comfort, however, depends heavily on who’s asking and who has access to the data.

“Patients’ views on AI in healthcare ultimately come down to trust,” Barich said. “They want confidence that their medical data is protected and used responsibly, not exploited. At the same time, they still value the irreplaceable role of in-person conversations with their doctors to guide the next steps in their care.”

The survey findings point to a careful balancing act. Patients want the benefits of digital tools and modern conveniences, but they want those innovations delivered through the trusted relationships they’ve built with their doctors, not through government databases or artificial intelligence systems that feel removed from the personal nature of medical care. Trust, it turns out, is the one thing technology still can’t replace.


Survey Methodology

The survey was commissioned by PatientPoint and conducted online by Talker Research between July 22 and July 29, 2025, among 2,000 U.S. adults who had visited a doctor within the past 12 months. Respondents were sourced from traditional online access panels and programmatic sampling methods. Quality control measures included removal of speeders, inappropriate responses, bots, and duplicates. The survey used non-probability sampling and was only available to individuals with internet access, so results may not apply to the entire U.S. population.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply