
(Photo by Rock Staar on Unsplash)
Research shows that owning a gun and political affiliation has no link to harboring the violent thoughts.
In a Nutshell
- A national survey of more than 7,000 U.S. adults suggests that roughly 19.3 million Americans have seriously thought about shooting another person at some point in their lives, with about 8.5 million reporting those thoughts in just the past year.
- Nearly three in ten people who reported these thoughts didn’t own or have access to a gun, pointing to the need for prevention strategies that go beyond existing gun owners.
- Men, younger adults, Black Americans, and urban residents were among the groups most likely to report these thoughts, while gun ownership and political affiliation showed no meaningful connection.
- About 4 million people who had thoughts of shooting someone told another person, a disclosure researchers say could serve as a critical intervention point, especially in states with red flag laws.
About 19.3 million American adults, roughly the combined populations of New York City and Los Angeles, have at some point seriously thought about shooting another person. That’s the stunning extrapolation from a new national survey published in JAMA Network Open, an effort to put a number on this poorly understood group and frame it as a focus for gun violence prevention.
Conducted by researchers at the University of Michigan, the study found that about 7.3% of adults reported having those thoughts at some point in their lifetime. Another 3.3%, an estimated 8.5 million people, said they had thought about it in just the past year. Those are not passing frustrations or fleeting anger. Researchers asked specifically about serious thoughts of shooting another person.
Beyond thoughts alone, a meaningful number of people reported taking concrete steps toward carrying out violence. An estimated 4 million adults said they had thought about getting a gun specifically to shoot someone. Roughly 1.5 million reported having actually brought a gun to a location with the intention of shooting someone. For some respondents, those thoughts were paired with concrete steps toward action.

Who Thinks About Shooting Others?
Between late May and early September 2025, researchers fielded the National Firearms, Alcohol, Cannabis, and Suicide survey to 7,034 adults across the country. Participants were recruited through mailed invitations and text messages and completed the survey online. Respondents averaged about 48 years old, and the sample was roughly evenly split between men and women. Researchers applied statistical adjustments so the results would reflect the broader U.S. population, accounting for age, sex, race and ethnicity, income, education, political party, region, and urban or rural status.
The demographic patterns line up with what past research has found about firearm violence. Men were more likely than women to report both lifetime and past-year thoughts of shooting someone, at about 9% versus 5.7%. Younger adults reported these thoughts more often than older adults. Black respondents had higher rates than white respondents, and people in urban areas reported higher rates than those in rural communities. Living in the Midwest was linked to higher odds of past-year thoughts compared to the West, and people with lower levels of education had higher odds than those with graduate degrees.
Perhaps most surprising was what was not linked to these thoughts in the survey. Gun ownership showed no meaningful connection. People who owned guns were no more likely to think about shooting someone than people who did not. Political affiliation also showed no link; Republicans, Democrats, and Independents reported similar rates. Income, while showing some association at the lowest levels for past-year thoughts, was not a strong factor overall.
Who Are the Targets?
Among those who reported seriously thinking about shooting someone, the most common target was “an enemy,” cited by 51% of that group. The second most common, at about 25%, was a stranger, described in the survey as someone involved in a random conflict or people in a public space. That category stands out because it includes strangers and public encounters, though the study doesn’t examine how those thoughts relate to mass shootings.
Some targets pointed toward politically motivated violence. About 13.6% of those with shooting-related thoughts named a government employee or official, and 6.6% named police or military personnel. Others directed their thoughts closer to home: roughly 10% thought about shooting a family member, about 9.5% thought about a former romantic partner, and about 8.6% thought about a current spouse or partner. Coworkers, bosses, classmates, friends, and acquaintances also appeared on the list.
A Window for Gun Violence Prevention
One of the study’s most revealing findings involves what people did when they had these thoughts. Among the 516 people who reported ever thinking about shooting someone, about 20.5% told another person. Scaled nationally, that translates to an estimated 4 million people who disclosed their violent thoughts to someone else. Researchers describe this disclosure as “a point of intervention,” particularly in states with so-called red flag laws that allow for the temporary removal of firearms from people considered a danger.
On the other side, only about 6.7% of those with shooting thoughts gave their gun to someone else for safekeeping during a crisis, an estimated 1.3 million people. Another 20.5% said they hadn’t done so but would consider it in the future. Meanwhile, 44.3% said they would not consider giving up their gun, and about 28.5% reported they didn’t own or have access to a gun in the first place.
That last figure matters. Nearly three in ten people who thought about shooting someone didn’t have a gun, which means prevention strategies can’t focus solely on existing gun owners. Researchers note that interventions at the point of gun sale, similar to approaches developed to prevent suicide, could help reach people who might seek out a weapon to act on violent thoughts.
In 2023, there were more than 116,000 emergency department visits for gun-related assaults and over 16,000 firearm-related homicides among U.S. adults. The survey data suggest that the population of people who have seriously considered committing gun violence is far larger than the number who actually do. The study doesn’t track what happens after these thoughts, but serious violence remains far rarer than these reported experiences. What the data make clear is that the warning signs may appear much earlier than the moment of violence.
Paper Notes
Limitations
Several limitations apply to this research. Completing the survey required online access and an understanding of English, which means certain populations may have been excluded. Respondents may also have misinterpreted some questions. The statistical weights used to make the sample nationally representative adjusted only for measured variables and could not account for bias in unmeasured differences or nonresponse patterns.
Funding and Disclosures
Research was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (awards RF1MH137443 and K18MH135466) of the National Institutes of Health, and by a Research Career Scientist award (RCS19-333) from the Department of Veterans Affairs. Funders had no role in the design, conduct, data analysis, or publication decisions. Dr. Mark Ilgen reported grants from the National Institute of Mental Health and the Department of Veterans Affairs during the conduct of the study, as well as personal fees from Arborsense (partial owner), Q Medical (consultant), Avania DSMB (member), and Brown University DSMB (member), and grants from the National Institute of Drug Abuse, National Institute of Alcohol and Alcoholism, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health outside the submitted work. The content represents the views of the authors only and does not necessarily reflect the official views of the National Institutes of Health or the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Publication Details
Authors: Brian M. Hicks, PhD, and Mark A. Ilgen, PhD. Dr. Hicks is affiliated with the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor. Dr. Ilgen is affiliated with the same department and with the VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Journal: JAMA Network Open, Volume 9, Issue 3. | Title: “Prevalence of Thoughts of Shooting Others Among US Adults” | Published: March 17, 2026. | DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.0734








I’d be interested to know what the study would find if you appended the condition: “…and you were absolutely certain you could get away with it.” I know that would change my answer.
If you ask 7,000 adults if they have ever thought about shooting someone, then you have an answer as to whether those 7,000 have ever wanted to shoot someone. You cannot project their answers onto 19 million other people. You would have to ask those 19 million whether they have ever wanted to shoot someone in order to make that claim that “19 million Americans have thought about shooting someone”
If you’re going to carry a firearm, which I do every day, you have to be willing to use it. Willing, not eager. Your study points out some of specious morality at work in the world currently.
JB the Elder suspects the number is a lot higher than 19,000,000. A LOT HIGHER. The figure of 19 million is the number who are willing to ADMIT to having these thoughts. Just my 2¢.
Somebody’s LYING!!!
Another poll trying to MAKE news, not report it. H/t Rush Limbaugh
That percentage is low unless you limit it to just shooting.
I’m betting close to 100% have wished someone dead.
University of Michigan study. I stopped reading at that point.
What makes this “study” complete bull 💩 is that we aren’t told if SELF DEFENSE had anything to do with the questions. Did people want to shoot another person just for sport or out of anger OR would they only pull the trigger to save themselves or someone they loved. That’s a HUGE difference in motivation and self control when using a gun. One is legally justified and the other is criminal behavior. Without this information the article is worthless and laughable.
Horrible sloppy journalism. 🤡🤣🤡
The study fails by not asking about motivation. As a gun owner, you should ask yourself if you could pull the trigger when someone threatens your life, or the life of others. If you can’t, a firearm is a liability l, not an asset. When interviewing for an armored car job, this was an interview question. Having “thought” about it often means you have assessed your own reality, but the article implies it is only done with malicious intent.
How interesting political affiliation has no bearing whatsoever – right. 2 attempts on trump, trans school shootings, antifa murdering a kid in the seattle “summer of love”. Steve Scalise shot at the congress baseball game, on and on. The left is the violent party. Name some conservative shooters. I’ll wait.
What a joke article, ‘thought crimes’. We should do this or that based on people having random thoughts!?! I’ve thought about how lying, power hungry, greedy politicians would milk this, but then that’s probably the group most mentioned while having those ‘thoughts’.
Really stupid study/survey. I suspect most who consider taking a life would have many thoughts on how, from poisons to running them down. Citing gun use smells of bias and agenda.
Extrapolation from survey results has a very shaky basis in fact. You’re assuming a 1:1 relationship between the survey pool and the public. Even the basic survey form of online only respondents via only English would confound anyone who doesn’t speak English primarily or use the Internet regularly. Science is dead if this is what is passing as science. And we wonder why people don’t trust academia.
Heck, I’ve had them in the sights with the safety off & pressure no the trigger. The guy had no idea he was almost dead.
Who are “they?”
Most likely the people the education system and media tell us to hate.
The enemies of rugged individualism.
Anyone we know in a blue state?
Quite a bit of an omission leaving this study only dealing with “getting a gun and killing someone.” But there are a lot more generic “I want to kill XYZ” with a non-specific method, be it knife, baseball bat, running them over, etc. Pretty disingenuous to leave that out in the name of making guns look like the bad thing in our society.
…and how many really lied about their answer?
Double or triple that number!