studying with headphones

(Photo by Karolina Grabowska from Pexels)

In A Nutshell

  • A survey of 226 university students found that 54% listen to music while studying and 46% avoid it, suggesting there is no universal answer.
  • Students who feel deeply connected to music in their daily lives were significantly more likely to study with it and rate it as helpful.
  • Working memory and a tendency to daydream had no bearing on whether someone chose to study with music or without it.
  • Feeling that music helps and actually comprehending material better are two different things, and this study did not test reading comprehension directly.

Walk into any college library or dorm room during finals week and you’ll likely see at least a few students hunched over a laptop, earbuds in, textbook open. Studying with music has become so routine that entire industries have grown around it, including the Lofi Girl YouTube channel, which had racked up 13.8 million subscribers and more than one billion views at the time of the study. And yet researchers have spent decades arguing about whether this habit actually helps students learn or works against them.

A new study published in Psychology of Music tried to cut through that debate by asking what university students actually do when they sit down to read, and whether anything about their personality or mental makeup predicts whether music helps or hurts. The answers were more personal than a simple thumbs up or thumbs down.

54% of Students Read With Music Playing, but the Split Was Nearly Even

Researchers surveyed 226 university students with an average age of around 28, ranging from 18 to 55. Most were studying full-time, and most identified as female. Participants answered questions about their music listening habits during reading and other tasks, then completed tests measuring how well they could hold information in mind while doing something else, how often their mind tends to drift, and how deeply music plays a role in their everyday lives.

When asked about reading for school specifically, the group split nearly down the middle: 54% said they often listen to music while studying, and 46% said they avoid it. That near-even divide is telling on its own. Whatever effect music has, it isn’t the same for everyone, and individual preference may matter more than any universal rule.

Teen boy reading book or studying for school
About half of students study with music playing. New research reveals what actually determines whether that’s a good idea. (Photo by Pixel-Shot on Shutterstock)

Classical, Rock, and the Case Against Lyrics While Studying

Among those who do listen, the most popular genre while reading was Classical, followed by Rock and Pop. Students showed clear preferences for music without sung words and for slower tempos when reading, a stark contrast to their choices during easier tasks, where most preferred lyrics and a faster beat. That context-dependent shift suggests students may be intuitively adjusting their listening choices to match the demands of what they’re doing, even without consciously thinking about it.

As for why they listen at all, the reasons varied: students commonly reported that music enhanced their focus, helped mask external noise, boosted motivation, and made reading more enjoyable. When participants were given space to write in their own reasons, a recurring theme emerged around stress and emotion, with responses like “it calms me down and reduces anxiety” and “it has a calming effect” appearing frequently.

Those who avoided music had a more unified explanation: 86% of that group said it simply distracted them.

The Surprising Role of Musical Identity in Study Habits

One of the study’s most interesting findings involves what the researchers called “Music Engagement,” essentially how central music is to a person’s life. People who scored higher on this measure, those who use music regularly to manage emotions, express themselves, or connect with others, were significantly more likely to listen while reading and to rate it as helpful. That relationship appeared in both the study’s group comparisons and correlation analyses.

What didn’t matter, at least according to these findings, was working memory, the ability to hold information in mind while handling another task. Researchers tested whether students with stronger working memory were more likely to study with music or find it helpful. Listeners and avoiders scored similarly, suggesting this mental skill isn’t what separates one group from the other.

A tendency to daydream also failed to predict whether someone avoided music. Students who reported frequently zoning out were no more likely to shun background music than those who described themselves as focused.

One additional wrinkle: students with more years of formal music training were actually less likely to listen while reading. This suggests deeper musical knowledge may make a person more sensitive to what’s playing and more prone to being pulled away from the page, though the study found only a weak statistical link, so it’s better treated as a lead worth following than a firm conclusion.

Does Feeling Helped Actually Mean Performing Better?

Among students who said they listen while reading for school, a large proportion rated the music as very helpful or extremely helpful. But the study authors are careful to note that feeling helped and actually performing better are two different things. No participant had their reading comprehension tested directly. This was a survey of self-reported habits and perceptions, not objective learning outcomes.

That gap between perception and performance matters. Students who love music may genuinely benefit from it, or they may enjoy studying more and mistake that enjoyment for better understanding. Future research would need to test whether perceived benefits actually show up in comprehension scores.

The near-even split between listeners and avoiders, combined with the finding that musical identity, more than working memory or attention span, was linked to the choice, suggests that blanket advice to either always or never study with music misses the point.

For students sorting out their own study habits, gut instinct may be a useful starting point. Of course, the real test is whether they understand and remember what they read.


Paper Notes

Limitations

This study relied entirely on self-reported data from participants about their own music listening habits, preferences, and perceptions, meaning the results reflect what students believe about their behavior rather than what is objectively measured. Reading comprehension was not directly tested, so it is not possible to confirm whether students who listen to music while reading actually perform better or worse as a result. The sample was drawn exclusively from university students, with a notable skew toward female participants and those studying full-time, which limits how broadly the findings can be applied. Additionally, the study was conducted online, meaning participants completed surveys and tests in self-selected environments without researcher oversight. The authors also note that it is not possible to determine the specific musical features, such as lyrical content or tempo, of the music participants were actually listening to, which makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions about which types of music are most or least distracting.

Funding and Disclosures

The authors reported receiving no financial support for the research, authorship, or publication of the article. A conflict-of-interest statement was not included in the paper.

Publication Details

Authors: Lindsey Cooke, Craig Speelman, and Ross Hollett, all affiliated with the School of Arts and Humanities, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia. Journal: Psychology of Music Paper Title: “Music as a distraction during reading: Music listening habits of university students” DOI: 10.1177/03057356261421209 Year: 2026

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment