Tablets scattered on the table of the

(© H_Ko - stock.adobe.com)

Viagra Plus Statins Tied to Better Cancer Survival Odds, Study Suggests

In A Nutshell

  • Viagra’s active ingredient, sildenafil, appears to trap cholesterol inside cancer cells, potentially limiting their ability to spread.
  • In mice, sildenafil reduced metastasis across breast, lung, and colon cancer models.
  • Health records from more than 40,000 male cancer patients linked combined sildenafil and statin use to a 31% lower risk of death within five years, compared to using neither drug.
  • The findings are observational and come from lab and animal studies, so clinical trials are needed before doctors could prescribe the combination for cancer.

Viagra has been quietly racking up a second résumé. Best known for treating erectile dysfunction, sildenafil turns out to have a separate, previously unrecognized effect inside cancer cells: it appears to disrupt their cholesterol supply, potentially leaving them poorly equipped to spread through the body.

A new study published in Cancer Research found that sildenafil disrupts how cancer cells handle cholesterol, a fat tumors depend on to build the flexible membranes they need to invade new tissue. By trapping cholesterol inside a cellular recycling compartment, the drug may limit how much cholesterol cancer cells have to work with. Mouse experiments across breast, lung, and colon cancer models, conducted in female mice, showed reduced metastasis, while cell-line experiments showed reduced migration and viability.

An analysis of health records from more than 40,000 male cancer patients found that men who had filled at least three sildenafil prescriptions in the six months before diagnosis and also used statins were associated with a 31% lower risk of death within five years, compared to those who used neither drug.

Sildenafil Traps Cholesterol Inside Cancer Cells

Cholesterol has a bad reputation in heart disease, but inside cells it’s a building material for outer walls and internal parts. Tumor cells breaking away from a primary mass need a lot of it to rebuild those walls and push through surrounding tissue.

Sildenafil works by blocking an enzyme called PDE5a. That enzyme’s job is to break down a molecule called cGMP, so blocking it lets cGMP build up. This is the same chemistry behind Viagra’s original use: more cGMP relaxes blood vessels. But the research team found that cGMP does something else entirely once it’s inside a cancer cell. It attaches to a protein called NPC1, which normally acts like a delivery truck, hauling cholesterol out of the cell’s internal trash-and-recycling depot (a compartment called a lysosome) and out to where the cell can actually use it. When cGMP builds up and jams that delivery truck, cholesterol piles up inside the depot instead of reaching the rest of the cell.

Cancer cells respond by trying to make their own cholesterol from scratch, flipping on an internal alarm switch. But it isn’t enough. Usable cholesterol still runs low, the cell’s outer wall gets flimsier, and its power plants sputter. Cells in that state struggle to migrate, invade nearby tissue, or spread to new organs.

Close up of a Statin Tablet on a Blister Pack
Sildenafil may block cholesterol cancer cells need to spread, and paired with statins, it’s linked to better survival odds. (Credit: Roger Ashford on Shutterstock)

Sildenafil Cuts Metastasis Across Multiple Cancer Types

Investigators tested sildenafil in three mouse cancer models, breast, lung, and colon, all in female mice. In every case, the drug cut lung metastases. In the breast cancer model, sildenafil barely touched the tumor’s size but slashed the number of metastatic colonies reaching the lungs.

To rule out a fluke, the team tried a related drug, vardenafil, and got the same result, then shut down the PDE5a gene directly and saw the same drop in metastases, evidence that the enzyme is what matters. The pattern held even in mice with badly weakened immune systems, pointing to sildenafil acting on tumor cells directly.

Across human cancer cell lines involving breast, prostate, colon, and lung cancers, sildenafil restricted cell movement and viability. Triple-negative breast cancer cells derived from patient tumors and grown in mouse models showed the same pattern: cholesterol-making machinery ramped up, usable cholesterol fell, and stored cholesterol piled up, signs of a cell stuck in a traffic jam it couldn’t clear.

Combining Sildenafil With Statins Improves Cancer Patient Survival

Statins, among the most widely prescribed drugs in the world, work by cutting cholesterol production at the source. Pairing sildenafil with a statin could block both the supply route and the recycling route at once.

Laboratory experiments supported that idea. Adding the statin lovastatin to sildenafil cut cancer cell movement and colony growth further than either drug alone, and pushed more cancer cells to die off. The combination barely touched healthy, noncancerous cells in the same experiments, a difference tied to cancer cells’ weaker internal recycling systems, which may leave them more exposed when that route gets blocked. Mouse experiments in breast and prostate cancer models backed this up, with the combined treatment affecting tumor behavior more than either drug alone.

Behind the 31% figure mentioned earlier is a database of health records at Clalit Health Services in Israel, covering roughly five million people over two decades. To be sure the effect wasn’t just a coincidence of who happens to take Viagra, that patient group was matched against similar non-users on income level, weight, health conditions, and cancer type before the survival numbers were calculated. As a further check, researchers looked at whether an unrelated drug called papaverine produced any similar benefit. It didn’t, supporting the idea that the effect is specific to this drug class rather than some other factor about the patients who take it.

Cancer stage at diagnosis wasn’t tracked in the database, a real gap, and people who got sildenafil outside the formal healthcare system went uncounted. Retrospective studies, however carefully designed, can’t fully prove cause and effect the way a clinical trial can.

Together, the lab work, animal studies, and health-record findings give researchers reason to test the combination in clinical trials. A medication with decades of safety data behind it warrants a closer look as a possible companion to existing cancer treatments. A familiar drug’s second act as a cancer-fighting agent is a reminder that useful treatments sometimes turn up where no one thought to look.


Disclaimer: This article is based on findings from a peer-reviewed study and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice. Sildenafil is not an approved cancer treatment, and individuals should consult a physician before making any changes to their medication or treatment plans.


Paper Notes

Study Limitations

The authors identify several important limitations. The observational analysis of health records relied on electronic dispensing data, meaning patients who obtained sildenafil privately or through informal channels would not have been captured, potentially leading to misclassification of exposure. The retrospective design makes it impossible to draw firm causal conclusions from the human data alone, even though the animal experiments provide biological support for causality. Cancer stage at the time of diagnosis was not available in the database and represents a meaningful unmeasured factor that could influence both drug use patterns and survival outcomes. The authors also note that while animal experiments were conducted in female mice using breast and colon cancer models, this means the study does not capture effects that might be specific to male physiology or to the conventional male context in which PDE5a inhibitors are typically used. Finally, certain cellular experiments may not fully replicate the complexity of human tumor environments.

Funding and Disclosures

The authors declare no conflict of interest. Funding sources listed in the paper include Minerva, the Israel Ministry of Health (grant 3-18791), the Israel Science Foundation (grant 873/23), the Israel Cancer Research Fund (grant 837124), the MAVRI (grant 2335/25), and the Mark Endeavor Foundation. Additional support was provided by the Moross Integrated Cancer Center, the EKARD Institute for Cancer Diagnosis Research, the Abisch-Frenkel RNA Therapeutics Center, the Koret Foundation, and the Vera and John Schwartz Family Center for Metabolic Biology. Individual researcher funding included support from the Dwek Institute for Cancer Therapy Research. The paper acknowledges the use of AI-based tools, specifically Grammarly and ChatGPT, for English language editing.

Publication Details

Title: PDE5a Inhibition Restricts Cancer Metastasis by Disrupting NPC1-Mediated Cholesterol Trafficking Through a Non-canonical cGMP-Dependent Pathway | Authors: Yarden Ariav, Samah Hayek, Thomas Cantore, Neel Sanghvi, Lital N. Adler, Naama Darzi, Lipika R. Pal, David Robert Crawford, Tomer Malleron, Josh Silverbeck, Eliane Yardeni, Emma Hajaj, Efrat Ben-Zeev, Sanju Sinha, Shahar Ziman, Amir Shlomai, Sergey Malitsky, Maxim Itkin, Smadar Levin-Zaidman, Inna Goliand, Omer Goldman, Hila Tishler, Alexander Brandis, Tevie Mehlman, Yuri Kuznetsov, Noga Kozer, Karen Shamash, Ella Itzhaki, Neta Ben-Chaim Moskovits, Dean Ranmar, Salomon M. Stemmer, Shay Ben-Shachar, Eytan Ruppin, and Ayelet Erez. | Corresponding Author: Ayelet Erez, Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. Email: [email protected] | Journal: Cancer Research (American Association for Cancer Research) | DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-26-1818


About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor