Vape device

Red and black vaping device. (Credit: Photo by Vaporesso on Unsplash)

A few days of vaping was all it took. In a new study, lead, nickel, and other toxic metals pushed deep into lung tissue, clustering in concentrated hotspots instead of spreading out evenly. Researchers say it is the first study to map exactly where vaping metals settle inside living lungs.

Vaping has surged among young people in recent years. In Australia alone, use among young adults jumped from about 5% in 2019 to over 21% in 2023, with similar spikes in the United States and the United Kingdom. E-cigarettes have long been marketed as a safer alternative to cigarettes, yet the new work, published in the journal Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, complicates that message.

At the heart of the problem are the devices themselves. Internal components like heating coils and solder joints can release metals into the liquid and vapor, while others, including arsenic and mercury, appear to trace back to the e-liquid ingredients. Beyond the familiar metals, the researchers also detected metal-containing compounds in the vapor that had never been reported before.

How Toxic Metals From Vaping End Up in Lung Tissue

A team of researchers exposed young lab mice to e-cigarette vapor for a short period, then examined their lung tissue using advanced imaging technology that can pinpoint individual metals at precise locations within the organ. The mice, a strain commonly used in respiratory research because their lung responses closely mirror those of human smokers, were divided into four groups of eight. Three groups were exposed to different amounts of vapor (8, 16, or 32 puffs per session), while a fourth group breathed only normal air as a control. Each group received two 30-minute exposure sessions per day over four consecutive days.

Their device was a refillable e-cigarette with a nickel-chromium heating element, loaded with a tobacco-flavored liquid containing nicotine. Before exposing the mice, the researchers ran the liquid and the resulting vapor through a battery of analytical instruments to figure out exactly what was in them. The liquid alone contained measurable levels of zinc, aluminum, copper, nickel, arsenic, tin, chromium, mercury, and lead, among other metals.

When the researchers analyzed the vapor itself, they found something no previous study had reported: signals of metals linked to organic molecules in the inhaled mist. They detected species containing aluminum, nickel, copper, arsenic, bromine, tin, and mercury, though the instruments could not pin down their exact chemical structures. Such metal-organic forms are a particular concern because the body absorbs them more easily than metals in their pure mineral state. Organic forms of mercury and tin, for example, are toxic even in tiny amounts and can cross cell walls and build up in tissues.

Where Toxic Metals From Vaping Collect in the Lungs

After the four-day exposure period, the researchers used a laser-based imaging system to create detailed maps showing exactly where metals had settled in the mouse lungs. The results were far from uniform. Lead, nickel, and tin tended to concentrate in the upper section and along the outer lining of the lung, while zinc was more common in lower regions. This patchy, uneven distribution may help explain the spotty lung injury sometimes linked to vaping, with some regions potentially taking on more metal than others.

Exposure left clear marks in the measurements. In the group receiving 32 puffs per session, peak lead concentrations in lung tissue were more than 25 times higher than in control mice that breathed only clean air. Copper levels were about three times higher than controls. Tin concentrations in the highest-exposure group spiked to more than 15 times the control level, though this metal accumulated in such a focused area that the increase didn’t reach statistical significance when averaged across the whole lung.

Nickel showed a statistically meaningful increase, with average levels rising from about 77 nanograms per gram in control lungs to 368 nanograms per gram in the group receiving eight puffs, nearly a fivefold jump. More puffs didn’t always mean proportionally more metal in the tissue, a pattern that could reflect the body’s clearance systems partially compensating at higher doses, or a change in how particles settle in the lungs as exposure rises.

Iron moved in the opposite direction, and the size of its drop stood out. Average iron concentrations fell from about 4,180 nanograms per gram in control lungs to just 667 nanograms per gram in the eight-puff group, a reduction of roughly 84%. This is the opposite of what studies on traditional cigarettes have found; conventional smoking typically increases iron in the lungs. The researchers noted that iron is critical for cell function, immune defense, and maintaining the balance between helpful and harmful chemical reactions in tissue. Its disruption has been linked to chronic lung diseases and serious respiratory conditions, a sign that vaping may harm the lungs in ways distinct from traditional smoking.

Infographic showing increased nickel and lead, decreased iron, and metal-related signals in mouse lungs after four days of vaping exposure.
Infographics by StudyFinds

No Safety Limits Exist for Metals in Vaping Products

When the researchers compared the metal levels found in the e-liquid to established safety benchmarks for inhaled pharmaceutical products, the closest existing standard since no specific limits exist for e-cigarettes, the results were sobering. Arsenic exceeded the benchmark by 480 times. Nickel surpassed it by 250 times. Mercury was 180 times over, chromium 60 times, and lead 17 times. Copper and tin also exceeded their respective limits. Only antimony fell within the acceptable range. These figures compare metal concentrations in the e-liquid with pharmaceutical limits, so they don’t translate directly into how much of each metal a person would inhale while vaping.

No current regulatory framework, not in the European Union, not from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and not from the World Health Organization, defines specific limits for metal contamination in e-cigarette liquids or vapor. Existing regulations focus mainly on nicotine content and ingredient disclosure. Researchers pointed to this as a major gap, especially given the popularity of disposable e-cigarettes among teenagers. That absence of any metal-specific rule points to an urgent need for safety standards that cover every component of an e-cigarette.

Health risks from these metals reach well beyond the lungs. Nickel can damage the cells lining the airways, impair tissue repair, and drive changes that raise the risk of scarring and chronic lung disease. Lead is readily absorbed across lung tissue into the bloodstream, where it can spread to bones, the brain, and other organs, contributing to high blood pressure, blood vessel damage, and cognitive problems. Copper imbalances promote harmful chemical stress in cells, and organic tin and arsenic compounds can cause nerve damage and genetic harm.

One critical question remains unanswered: whether the metals deposited in the lungs stay there or eventually enter the bloodstream and build up in distant organs. If metals spread throughout the body, the health consequences of vaping could reach far beyond lung injury, a possibility that demands further investigation.

Just four days of exposure produced measurable changes in lung tissue metal levels. Researchers acknowledged that the refillable device they tested, chosen because it allowed controlled, reproducible experiments, may underestimate real-world exposure, since disposable e-cigarettes, the type most popular with young people, have been reported to release even higher concentrations of nickel, copper, and lead. A review cited by the team found that metal levels in biological samples from e-cigarette users were often similar to or higher than those found in people who smoke traditional cigarettes, and sometimes even higher than levels seen in cigar users.

Four days of vaping left higher levels of toxic metals in the lungs of young mice, sent iron levels crashing, and turned up metal-containing vapor compounds never reported before. With e-cigarette use climbing among teenagers worldwide, these results make a forceful case that what goes into vaping devices, from the metals in the coils to the chemicals in the liquid, demands the same kind of rigorous safety testing required of other inhaled products. Right now, that testing simply doesn’t exist.

Disclaimer: This article describes a preclinical study conducted in mice over a short, four-day exposure period. Results from animal research do not always translate to humans, and a brief exposure window cannot speak to the long-term effects of vaping. The study measured where metals accumulated in lung tissue and compared e-liquid metal concentrations against pharmaceutical benchmarks; it did not establish disease outcomes in people. These results point to areas that need further investigation, not confirmed health effects in humans.


Paper Notes

Limitations

This study has several important limitations. The exposure period was short, only four days, making it impossible to draw conclusions about what happens with long-term or chronic vaping. Researchers used a single refillable e-cigarette device and a single e-liquid formulation, so results may not apply across the wide variety of devices and liquids on the market. The study used a mouse model, and while the strain chosen is considered a good stand-in for human respiratory responses, animal results do not always translate directly to people. Metal distribution patterns were not strictly dose-dependent, and the mechanisms behind metal deposition and clearance in the lung are not fully understood. The metal-containing species detected in the vapor could not be fully identified at the molecular level because of limitations in the analytical techniques; the researchers described those findings as tentative and called for further investigation with additional methods. Zinc levels in lung tissue could not be definitively tied to vaping rather than normal baseline levels, since zinc is naturally present in lung tissue. Sample size was eight mice per group, which is relatively small.

Funding and Disclosures

The University of Technology Sydney Seed Funding scheme (grant 0200804, 2024) funded the study, and CAUL and its member institutions supported open-access publication. Two of the authors, Andrew Thorpe and Oliver Royle, are supported by Research Training Program scholarships from the Australian government. The team also acknowledged philanthropic support from the Mikos Family and an in-kind contribution of analytical equipment from Agilent Technologies Australia. The authors declared no competing financial interests, with one noted exception: co-author David Clases is a member of ABC’s International Advisory Board but was not involved in the peer review of the paper. The authors also disclosed that they used generative AI tools only to assist with language editing of the manuscript, and that they reviewed and verified all content.

Publication Details

Paper Title: “Analytical investigation of metal distribution from e-cigarette aerosols to lung deposition using multi-platform mass spectrometry”

Authors: Jack McGrath, Oliver Royle, Andrew Thorpe, Janice Irene McCauley, Maiken Ueland, Irina Kabakova, Hui Chen, David Clases, Brian G. Oliver, and Dayanne Mozaner Bordin, with Dayanne Mozaner Bordin (University of Technology Sydney) as corresponding author

Journal: Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, volume 418, pages 3821–3835, and appeared online on April 16, 2026

DOI: 10.1007/s00216-026-06487-1

Animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Ethics Committee at the University of Technology Sydney (approval #ETH18-3179).

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor