(Credit: Prime.Pixels on Shutterstock)
In a Nutshell
- Nuclear DNA from a roughly 15,800-year-old dog at Pınarbaşı, Turkey, and a roughly 14,300-year-old dog at Gough’s Cave, UK, is the oldest firm genetic proof of dogs yet, pushing the record back about 5,000 years.
- Though they lived thousands of miles apart, the two dogs were nearly identical genetically, showing a single dog population had already spread across western Eurasia by the end of the Ice Age.
- Their human communities were culturally and genetically distinct, so dogs were likely being passed between groups that otherwise kept to themselves.
A jawbone pulled from the depths of a famous British cave and tiny bones buried alongside humans at a site in central Turkey have rewritten what scientists can prove about Earth’s oldest friendship. For the first time, nuclear DNA, the gold standard of genetic identification, confirms that dogs lived with people across a vast stretch of the ancient world thousands of years earlier than any hard genetic evidence had shown before.
Until now, the earliest dogs definitively identified through their DNA came from a site in northwestern Russia dating to roughly 10,900 years ago, well after the end of the Ice Age. Older bones claimed as dogs have surfaced across Europe and Asia, some supposedly tens of thousands of years old, but without nuclear DNA, the genetic code stored in a cell’s nucleus, telling a dog from a wolf in those early stages of domestication was all but impossible.
Now, an international research team reporting in the journal Nature has recovered nuclear DNA from canine remains at two sites: Pınarbaşı in Turkey, dating to roughly 15,800 years ago, and Gough’s Cave in the United Kingdom, dating to about 14,300 years ago. Both animals were genetically dogs, not wolves. Most remarkable, these two dogs, separated by thousands of miles and more than a millennium, were genetically very similar. That points to a single, relatively uniform dog population that had already fanned out across western Eurasia by the tail end of the Ice Age.
Ancient DNA Proves Dogs Spread Earlier Than Anyone Knew
For decades, that difference stumped researchers. Wolves and early dogs looked almost identical, their skulls, teeth, and skeletons overlapping in size and shape, and the usual tools, bone measurements, dietary chemistry, and short fragments of simpler DNA, kept producing murky answers. Several specimens once celebrated as the world’s oldest dogs, from Belgium, the Czech Republic, and the Altai Mountains of Russia, turned out to be extinct wolves once researchers finally read their nuclear DNA.
Researchers tackled the problem directly, pulling nuclear DNA from eight previously unanalyzed canine specimens across multiple sites. Six of the eight clustered genetically with known dogs rather than wolves. The standouts were the Pınarbaşı individual, at roughly 15,800 years old, and the Gough’s Cave dog at about 14,300 years old, which push the firm genetic evidence for dogs back by roughly 5,000 years beyond the previous record holder in Russia. The team also identified a wolf from the same layer at Gough’s Cave, along with later dogs from two sites in Serbia.
Same Dogs, Different People
What caught the researchers’ attention was less the age of these dogs than how alike they were despite the enormous distance between them. Pınarbaşı sits on a high plateau in modern Turkey; Gough’s Cave is a limestone cavern in southwest England. Yet their DNA showed the two were more closely related to each other than to any other dog in the dataset. Using a time-calibrated family tree, the team estimated that their lineages split no earlier than about 18,500 years ago, just a few thousand years before the Pınarbaşı dog died.
Even more intriguing, these closely related dogs lived alongside human groups that were genetically and culturally distinct. The people at Gough’s Cave belonged to one cultural tradition, and suspected dogs from sites in Germany, Switzerland, and Italy were linked to a second, both of them European. The humans at Pınarbaşı, by contrast, were Anatolian hunter-gatherers, a separate population altogether. The two European groups had already split by the peak of the last Ice Age, roughly 24,000 to 21,000 years ago. Yet they all kept dogs drawn from one shared population.
This mismatch between human diversity and dog uniformity points to a likely explanation: dogs were exchanged between culturally distinct bands of Ice Age hunter-gatherers, even when the people themselves were not mixing enough to leave a genetic trace. Across 35 sites spanning thousands of years, the team found a strong overall match between how similar humans were to each other and how similar their dogs were. But in the late Ice Age, the dogs were far more alike than their human companions, a pattern that stands out.
How Ancient Dogs Traveled With and Between Peoples
Researchers propose one plausible scenario for how this happened. Roughly 16,000 years ago, people carrying one particular ancestry and set of customs began expanding across Europe, gradually replacing older cultural groups across much of the continent. Dogs, the team suggests, spread alongside them. Under this model, people in places like Britain and possibly Spain acquired dogs through contact with the newcomers, even though that contact left no detectable genetic mixing between the human groups themselves.
That timing fits. The window in which the ancestral dog population must have spread, between roughly 18,500 and 14,000 years ago, lines up with the expansion. Later people in Britain carried ancestry linked to the newcomers, and shifts in stone-tool styles over the same stretch point to contact between the two groups.
Beyond the genetics, the remains show how closely these ancient dogs and humans were intertwined. At Gough’s Cave, the human bones bear dramatic marks of funerary cannibalism, with skulls shaped into cups and bones engraved. The dog remains from the same site were treated much the same way after death, including a deliberate piercing through the jaw. At Pınarbaşı, newborn and juvenile dogs were buried in the same part of the site as people. Such shared burial and body-treatment practices suggest dogs carried deep symbolic meaning, pushing behaviors once documented only in later eras back into the deep Ice Age.
Diet offered another clue. Using chemical signatures locked in bone proteins, the team compared what the dogs and humans at both sites ate. At Gough’s Cave, dogs and people sat at a similar spot in the food chain, eating comparable amounts of meat. At Pınarbaşı, the signatures in the dog bones, which came from newborns and so reflected their mothers’ diets, pointed to a diet of freshwater fish, a food common in the site’s human-occupied layers. That hints dogs were being fed by people, directly or through scraps.
An Eastern Wave Reshaped Europe’s Dogs
Researchers also traced how the genetic makeup of European dogs shifted over the following millennia. Dogs fall into two broad lineages: a western one, seen in European and Near Eastern dogs, and an eastern one, seen in Arctic, East Asian, and ancient American dogs. The Ice Age dogs from Gough’s Cave and Pınarbaşı belong firmly to the western branch, pushing the split between east and west back to at least 15,800 years ago.
After the Ice Age, a major wave of eastern dog ancestry reached Europe. Dogs from Serbian sites of that period carried roughly 44 percent eastern ancestry on average, and the timing matches the known movement of eastern hunter-gatherers into Europe. Earlier work had chalked up this east-west blending to much later migrations of herding peoples in the Bronze Age, but the new DNA shows it happened thousands of years sooner. That mixed ancestry then carried through every later period and into modern breeds, which still run about 20 percent eastern today.
One of the study’s most surprising findings is how little wolf DNA made it into dogs over the past 15,000-plus years. Dogs and wolves shared the same landscapes across western Eurasia that whole time. Even so, European dogs picked up almost no wolf ancestry. That sets them apart from pigs and cattle, which bred freely with wild boar and aurochs after reaching Europe. The Near East was the exception. There, signs of wolf ancestry reach back at least 15,800 years, to the Pınarbaşı dog itself. They peak in a roughly 7,000-year-old dog from Israel that carried about 19 percent wolf ancestry, then fade in later populations. Whatever kept dogs and wolves apart, whether behavioral, social, or cultural, was already in place by the late Ice Age. It shows how thoroughly domestication had reshaped these animals.
Fifteen thousand eight hundred years is a long time. Civilizations had not yet been imagined. Agriculture was millennia away. Yet across the cold, thinly peopled landscapes of Ice Age Europe and Turkey, dogs were already there: buried with their people, eating their food, passed between groups with different customs and stone-tool traditions. The genetic proof was simply waiting, locked inside ancient bone, for someone to read it.
Paper Notes
Limitations
The study’s conclusions about the geographic spread of Ice Age dogs rest on a relatively small number of specimens. Nuclear genomes were generated from just eight newly sequenced individuals, most at low coverage, and only two of these date to the late Ice Age. Several of the Serbian dogs yielded very low-quality genomes, which limits the precision of ancestry modeling. The researchers acknowledge that the scenario linking the spread of dogs to a specific cultural expansion, while consistent with available evidence, cannot be confirmed definitively given the scarcity of surviving dog remains from this period, and alternative scenarios involving other exchange networks cannot be ruled out. Dietary analysis, while suggestive of close human-dog association, lacks the resolution to definitively distinguish between wild and domestic canines, since different diets can produce identical chemical signatures. Sample selection was opportunistic rather than statistically predetermined, limited to specimens that preserved enough bone or tooth material, and the study design did not call for blinding or randomization. The authors also note uncertainties in interpreting the Pınarbaşı newborn dog data, which assumes a minimal isotopic offset between the mothers and their unborn pups.
Funding and Disclosures
The research was supported by a Wellcome Senior Research Fellowship (grant no. 100719/Z/12/Z) and a Natural Environment Research Council grant (no. NE/X01469X/1), with open-access publication funded by Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. Computational work relied on several high-performance computing systems, including the BioHPC and the Linux cluster of the Leibniz Supercomputing Centre in Munich, the Smithsonian High-Performance Computing Cluster, the Natural History Museum’s internal cluster, and the CropDiversity HPC at the James Hutton Institute. The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics review was not required, as the study analyzed archaeological remains, and all newly generated ancient DNA sequences are publicly available in the European Nucleotide Archive under BioProject PRJEB104454. The paper is published open access under a CC BY 4.0 license.
Publication Details
Paper Title: Dogs were widely distributed across western Eurasia during the Palaeolithic
Authors: William A. Marsh and Lachie Scarsbrook (co-first authors, contributed equally), with co-authors. Corresponding authors: William A. Marsh ([email protected]) and Ian Barnes ([email protected]), Natural History Museum, London; Lachie Scarsbrook ([email protected]); Greger Larson ([email protected]), University of Oxford; and Laurent A. F. Frantz ([email protected]), Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich. Larson, Barnes, and Frantz jointly supervised the work.
Journal: Nature, vol. 651, pp. 995–1003 (published online 25 March 2026; print 26 March 2026)
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-026-10170-x
Full citation: Marsh, W. A., Scarsbrook, L., et al. “Dogs were widely distributed across western Eurasia during the Palaeolithic.” Nature 651, 995–1003 (2026).







