(Photo by fizkes on Shutterstock)
Even With Insomnia, a Regular Routine Was Linked to Less Pain and Better Mood
In A Nutshell
- Older adults with chronic insomnia kept daily routines just as regular as good sleepers, challenging the assumption that poor sleep automatically disorganizes daily life.
- Across both groups, adults with steadier daily schedules for waking, eating, and socializing reported less pain, lower body mass index, and fewer depressive symptoms.
- Having insomnia did not weaken or change these links between routine regularity and health, suggesting the benefits may apply broadly to older adults.
- The findings come from a modest, single-site study, so they show an association rather than proof that adjusting a daily schedule will improve health.
It would be easy to assume that chronic insomnia throws an older adult’s entire schedule off course: irregular meals, erratic bedtimes, a life that falls apart because sleep already has. New research complicates that picture entirely. Adults with insomnia kept just as steady a daily routine as good sleepers did. What was consistently linked to pain, body mass index, and depressive symptoms across both groups was the regularity of a person’s daily schedule.
A team of researchers from the University of Missouri, Washington State University, Trinity College, the University of Macau, and the University of Pittsburgh set out to examine how consistent daily schedules relate to physical and mental health in older adults. Their findings, published in the Journal of Behavioral Medicine, suggest the timing of daily life may be another important piece of older adults’ health, even when insomnia is present.
Researchers call this consistency behavioral-social rhythms: the regularity of daily activities that act like internal clock cues, known scientifically as zeitgebers, helping the body’s circadian system stay in sync with the 24-hour day.
Insomnia Group Kept Routines Just As Regular As Good Sleepers
Researchers recruited 67 older adults with an average age of 68. Thirty-seven had been diagnosed with chronic insomnia, while 30 were identified as “good sleepers” with no significant sleep complaints. Participants in the insomnia group met strict clinical criteria, including a formal diagnosis, elevated scores on a standard insomnia severity test, and sleep diary data showing more than 40 minutes spent lying awake at night. Good sleepers reported little trouble falling or staying asleep and met the study’s threshold for efficient sleep during screening.
To measure daily routine regularity, participants used a tool called the Social Rhythm Metric-5. For seven days straight, they recorded the exact times they woke up, had their first social interaction, started work or another daily task, ate dinner, and went to bed. Researchers then checked how close each day’s timing came to a person’s own weekly average. Someone who did all five activities within 45 minutes of their usual time every day scored a perfect 7, reflecting high regularity, while a schedule that shifted wildly from day to day scored closer to 0.
Pain and depressive symptoms were assessed with established questionnaires. Body mass index was calculated from height and weight measured by trained staff, not self-reported figures.
Group comparisons turned out nearly identical on routine regularity and body mass index, undercutting the assumption that a broken night’s sleep also breaks a person’s daily structure. As expected, participants with insomnia did report significantly more pain and considerably more depressive symptoms than good sleepers, tracking with earlier research connecting poor sleep to physical and emotional strain in later life.
Regular Routines Were Linked to Less Pain Across Both Groups
A more consequential finding emerged when researchers looked across the entire sample, insomnia sufferers and good sleepers combined. Adults with steadier daily schedules reported measurably less pain, lower body mass index, and fewer depressive symptoms, no matter which sleep group they belonged to, and having insomnia did not change or weaken any of those connections. Male participants did report somewhat less pain than female participants overall, a separate finding unconnected to the main routine results.
This pain finding was a newer contribution, since this connection has received little research attention. Earlier research on behavioral-social rhythms has focused mostly on mood and metabolism.
Why a Predictable Schedule Might Be Linked to Better Health
Study authors propose several reasons why a predictable routine might be linked to better health. Consistent activity timing may help anchor the body’s internal clock, a mechanism that could plausibly support healthier metabolism and ease pain sensitivity, though the study did not test these pathways directly. There’s also a possible social dimension: regular routines often mean steady social contact, which could reinforce stability, reduce stress, and support mood in ways that ripple outward to physical health.
Study authors are careful to note limitations. A modest sample of 67 adults recruited in the Pittsburgh area, and a cross-sectional design that captured data at a single point in time, make it impossible to say irregular routines cause worse health. It’s equally possible that pain, weight gain, or depression make it harder to keep a steady schedule, or that a separate factor, like personality traits, drives both patterns simultaneously. The pain finding is also preliminary, since pain was measured with a brief general scale rather than a detailed chronic-pain assessment, and the sample may have been too small to detect subtler effects of insomnia on these relationships.
Sleep quality can be stubbornly difficult to fix, especially for someone already living with insomnia. Routine may be a more workable target. Getting up, eating meals, and keeping social contact at fairly consistent times could be worth exploring as a practical way to support health in later life, though the findings show a link, not proof that changing a schedule will reduce pain, lower body mass index, or prevent depression.
Disclaimer: This article summarizes findings from a single peer-reviewed study and is intended for general informational purposes only. It is not medical advice. Anyone with concerns about insomnia, chronic pain, weight, or depression should speak with a qualified healthcare provider.
Paper Notes
Limitations
The study’s authors point to several factors that call for caution. The sample of 67 participants, while adequate to detect medium-sized statistical effects according to a post hoc power analysis, lacked the power to reliably detect smaller effects or the three-way interactions the researchers had hoped to test. Behavioral-social rhythm scores relied on self-reported activity timing recorded in daily diaries, which introduces a risk of recall inaccuracy. The pain measure, drawn from a general health survey, was not designed specifically to assess chronic pain, so the pain findings should be viewed with some caution. Most significantly, the study’s cross-sectional design, meaning all data were collected at a single point in time, prevents any conclusion about cause and effect. It remains possible that unmeasured factors, such as personality traits like conscientiousness, independently drive both routine regularity and better health outcomes.
Funding and Disclosures
The research was funded by a grant from the National Institute on Aging (R01AG20677) awarded to Daniel J. Buysse. The authors reported no actual or potential conflicts of interest with the funding organization.
Publication Details
The study, titled “Behavioral-social rhythms and insomnia symptoms: associations with pain, body mass index, and depressive symptoms among older adults,” was authored by Eunjin Lee Tracy, Christine J. So, Brian Chin, Yuxi Xie, H. Matthew Lehrer, Jill A. Kanaley, Brant P. Hasler, and Daniel J. Buysse. Tracy and So served as co-first authors. The authors are affiliated with the University of Missouri, Washington State University, Trinity College, the University of Macau, and the University of Pittsburgh. The paper was published in the Journal of Behavioral Medicine, Volume 49, pages 551 to 556, in 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-026-00646-6.







