Rössler-Portia-adultMale-Sleep

The spider Portia fimbriata in a sleeping position, hanging upside down beneath its self-spun web. Photo: Daniela C. Rößler

Spiders Have a Twitchy Sleep Stage Resembling REM in Mammals

In A Nutshell

  • A jumping spider species twitched its legs and eyes in bursts that resemble REM sleep in mammals.
  • Spiders mid-twitch reacted slower to a sound than awake ones, and four of 10 did not react at all.
  • After one night of fruit fly disruption, spiders showed about 65% more twitching bursts.
  • No brain activity was measured, so the evidence is behavioral, not brain-confirmed.

Lose a night of sleep, and the body tends to make up for it later. A small jumping spider from Queensland, Australia, appears to do the same. After one night pestered by fruit flies, the spiders returned the next night with about 65% more bursts of twitching, according to a new study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The bursts, which involve twitching legs and shifting eyes, resemble REM sleep in mammals. REM, short for rapid eye movement, is the sleep stage marked by darting eyes and twitching limbs.

An earlier report of similar twitching in a different jumping spider raised an obvious question: was the animal really asleep, or just resting? Scientists use a behavioral checklist to tell the difference, including a distinct sleeping posture, long stretches of stillness, and being harder to rouse. The species studied here, Portia fimbriata, passed all of it.

That matters because sleep science leans heavily on mammals and birds, whose brains are built very differently from a spider’s. Octopuses and fruit flies have recently shown signs of sleeping in stages too, and spiders now have behavioral evidence pointing the same way.

Spider Sleep Has a REM-Like Stage Marked by Twitching

Researchers studied 92 spiders, all lab-raised offspring of spiders from a captive breeding program in Queensland, kept on a 12-hour light and 12-hour dark schedule. Portia is an unusually clever hunter that preys on other spiders.

First came a test of whether the spiders have an internal body clock. Forty were watched by infrared camera for 60 hours under normal day-night lighting, constant dim light, or constant bright light. Their cycle of rest and activity carried on in constant dim light, and weakened but did not vanish in constant bright light, a sign that the rhythm comes from inside the spider rather than from changes in light.

Then 10 spiders were filmed overnight. At dusk, the spiders searched for a sleeping spot, often a silk retreat, and hung upside down beneath a silk platform with their rear ends sagging, a posture unlike their daytime stance. Sleep began about 15 minutes after the lights went out and lasted nearly 11 hours. Twitching came in bursts, averaging about 11 a night among those 10 spiders, each lasting around 80 seconds. The first showed up about four hours in on average, though timing varied widely from spider to spider.

spider sleep
The spider Portia fimbriata hunting an orb-web spider. Credit: Daniela C. Rößler

Four of 10 Spiders in REM-Like Sleep Ignored a Sound

Twitching alone does not prove a different brain state, since it could be random muscle jitter. So 30 adult spiders, half male and half female, were each tested once with a tone that slowly grew louder over 10 seconds. Ten spiders were awake, 10 had been motionless for at least 15 minutes, and 10 were mid-twitch.

Awake spiders reacted in under two seconds on average. Motionless ones took a bit longer, and twitching spiders were slowest, at more than four seconds. Every awake and motionless spider reacted within the 10 seconds, but only six of the 10 twitching spiders did. The other four responded right away when retested awake, which rules out a hearing or movement problem.

One catch: twitching spiders were reliably slower than awake ones, but the gap between twitching and plain motionless spiders was too small to rule out chance. Motionless spiders also varied widely, with some reacting as fast as awake ones and others as slowly as twitching ones. That hints that stillness includes both light rest and deeper sleep, though the sample was small and the authors call the idea tentative.

Disrupted Spider Sleep Brought More REM-Like Episodes the Next Night

A final experiment asked whether spiders need this sleep. Seventeen spiders each spent one night with 25 live fruit flies in their enclosure. Flies suit the job because Portia specializes in hunting other spiders, so they jostle it without triggering a full hunt. Spiders stayed in resting postures but were repeatedly startled, shifted around, and sometimes tried to dislodge the flies. Usable recordings came from 13 of them.

On the next night, twitching episodes became more frequent without getting any longer, and overall sleep time grew by about 8.5%. A control group of five undisturbed spiders, tracked for three nights, did not sleep longer as the nights went on, so the extra rest traced back to the flies.

Why a spider would need a twitchy stage is an open question. The authors note that Portia lives in a dense rainforest, where it must make sense of constant motion, light, and shape, and that REM sleep in mammals has been linked to learning and memory. A spider’s brain may use the bursts to sort through the day’s sights, though that idea was not tested. Brain waves were not measured either, so some quiet stretches may have been calm wakefulness.

Spiders appear to need their sleep, twitching included. Behavior alone makes a strong case that they sleep in stages, and brain recordings will show how close the match to mammal REM really is.


Paper Notes

Limitations

Without brain-monitoring tools such as EEGs, which are not yet feasible for most invertebrates, the researchers cannot completely rule out that some quiet periods were light wakefulness rather than true sleep. Sample sizes were small for some experiments: the overnight filming analysis involved 10 spiders, and the sound test used 30 adults, each tested once in a single state. The difference in reaction time between twitching and resting spiders did not reach statistical significance after correction. The authors call their manipulation “sleep disruption” rather than full sleep deprivation, since brief or shallow sleep could not be entirely excluded, and only 13 of 17 disrupted spiders produced recordings suitable for analysis. All spiders were one species raised in a lab, and individuals varied noticeably in sleep timing, structure, and responsiveness. The authors say this variation may reflect flexibility in how sleep is regulated, though it also adds uncertainty to broad conclusions.

Funding and Disclosures

The study was supported by the Zukunftskolleg at the University of Konstanz and the Emmy Noether Programme of the German Research Foundation, with open access funding provided by the Max Planck Society. The authors declared no competing interests. They disclosed using AI tools (Deepseek, ChatGPT, and Gemini) to assist with code for data analysis and plotting, and Grammarly and ChatGPT for grammar checking and minor translation help. They stated these tools were not used for writing the text or generating figures, and that they reviewed all AI-generated code and take full responsibility for its accuracy.

Publication Details

The paper, “Behavioral evidence for two-stage sleep in spiders,” was published October 26, 2026, in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), Vol. 123, No. 45, e2618030123. Authors are Nadja Geiger, Maxim Q. Capelle, Phillip Rosentreter, Marie E. Herberstein, Armin Bahl, Massimo De Agrò, Barrett A. Klein, and Daniela C. Rößler. Amita Sehgal of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, edited the paper, which was received June 2, 2026, and accepted September 16, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2618030123. Data, code, and supplemental material are available through Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18501385.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor