A Rutgers smart shoe prototype analyzes movement and could one day help track changes in how people walk. Credit: Veronica Mendez/Rutgers University
Smart Shoes Powered by Footsteps Can Tell Walking, Running, and Stair Climbing Apart
In A Nutshell
- Prototype sneakers with no battery ran an AI motion sensor on footstep power, averaging just 86 microwatts.
- Onboard AI told walking, running, and stair climbing apart, counted steps, and estimated calories.
- A slimmed-down AI model reached 95.4% accuracy on test data from four healthy volunteers.
- Operation is shown only while the wearer moves, and calorie figures are estimates.
A smartwatch that turns off mid-workout is a familiar frustration. A prototype pair of sneakers sidesteps the problem with no battery and no charging cable, yet it can tell walking from running from stair climbing, count steps, and estimate calories burned. Engineers led by a Rutgers University team report in Science Advances that the shoe’s motion sensor and artificial intelligence (AI) software run on electricity generated by the wearer’s own footsteps, drawing an average of just 86 microwatts of power.
Comparable wearable AI systems typically run in the 10 to 100 milliwatt range, the authors report, making this design roughly a hundred times leaner. A milliwatt is one-thousandth of a watt, and a microwatt is one-millionth.
Each footstep squeezes and releases an energy-harvesting layer tucked into the shoe’s air cushion, and the team built the electronics to run on that pulsed current. Operation continues as long as the wearer keeps moving, and the paper does not show uninterrupted operation through long motionless stretches such as sleep. Even so, a battery-free design targets a real problem, since a dead battery interrupts monitoring in devices meant to track walking over long periods.
Battery-Free Smart Shoes Can Start From Zero Charge in as Little as 5.95 Seconds of Lab Tapping
Four connected parts make up the system. An energy harvester, a layered material that produces a small electrical charge each time its layers press together and spring apart, sits in the sole’s air cushion, measures about 3.1 by 2.3 inches, and weighs under 2 ounces. A power management circuit smooths that jumpy trickle into steady power. An accelerometer, a tiny chip that senses motion in three directions, gathers movement data. A compact AI program on the shoe’s built-in computer chip interprets it.
Starting from nothing was its own puzzle. A device with a fully drained battery cannot turn itself back on, and control circuits normally need some power just to wake up. The team added a cold-start module that captures the first small bursts of energy from footsteps, uses them to wake the circuit, then switches to a more efficient charging route. In a laboratory test where an operator tapped the harvester as fast as possible, the power management circuit started from zero stored energy in as little as 5.95 seconds.
Counting the power management circuitry, the full system drew about 108 microwatts, still well below what the harvester produced in lab tapping tests.
Even Slow Walking Can Power the Battery-Free Smart Shoes’ Entire System
Four healthy volunteers, three men and one woman between ages 23 and 26, wore the shoes. They stood roughly 5 feet 5 inches to 5 feet 11 inches tall and weighed about 159 to 205 pounds. Each used a treadmill set to 1.3 mph for slow walking, 2.0 mph for fast walking, and 3.0 mph for running, staying at each pace for several minutes. A stair climber set to 60 steps per minute covered the stair-climbing trials.
After trimming the start and end of each trial, the team sliced the recordings into 537 windows of 15 seconds each. About 80% trained the AI, while the remaining 20%, held back until later, tested it. The accelerometer’s readings were also checked against an iPhone’s built-in motion sensor during side-by-side shaking tests.
In intended use, raw movement data does not need to leave the shoe. The chip processes each window itself and shows finished results, including step count, activity type, and estimated calories, on a small low-power screen mounted on the shoe. The authors chose a screen over wireless streaming because radio communication would demand far more energy, and future versions could send compact summaries wirelessly. Step counts from the left and right shoes matched closely and agreed with hand counts, according to the authors. Even slow walking can sustainably power the entire system, the paper reports.
A Slimmed-Down AI Model Runs 15 Times Faster and Reaches 95.4% Accuracy on Test Data
Fitting AI onto a chip that sips power took trimming. An early version of the activity classifier was slightly more accurate but needed more memory than the chip could hold and took 6.1 seconds to process each 15-second window of data.
A technique that ranks which pieces of motion data matter most for telling activities apart pointed to just three measurements: how much the foot’s acceleration varies along each of three directions. Dropping everything else also let the researchers skip a math-heavy processing step. That slimmed-down version classified the four activities with 95.4% accuracy on the study’s test data. Processing time fell to 0.4 seconds per window, and electrical current dropped more than sixfold.
Calorie estimates come from a standard formula that multiplies body weight, time spent, and a preset intensity value for each activity. The program assumed 75 kilograms (about 165 pounds) when a wearer’s weight was unavailable, so the numbers are estimates, not direct measurements.
Gait, or the way a person walks, serves as a warning sign for conditions including cystic fibrosis, Parkinson’s disease, spinal cord injury, and rare bone diseases, the authors note. They see the platform eventually tracking outcomes such as fall risk or recovery, though that would require retraining and validating the AI with larger, more varied groups, including people with health conditions.
For now, the shoe shows that AI activity tracking can run on walking power alone. Whether it holds up in patients remains untested.
Paper Notes
Limitations
Testing involved only four healthy volunteers, all between 23 and 26 years old, a small and narrow sample. The 95.4% accuracy comes from a test set of 108 windows drawn from those same four people, so it does not show performance across a broader population. Calorie estimates rely on a standard formula with preset activity values, and the paper does not report checking them against laboratory measurements. Activities took place on a treadmill and a stair climber, and the 5.95-second start-up was measured in a laboratory tapping test rather than during everyday walking. Operation is demonstrated while gait motion continues, not through long periods of stillness. The authors note that future work will need larger and more varied groups, including different ages, body weights, gait patterns, and health conditions, before the system could be applied to populations with mobility disorders.
Funding and Disclosures
According to the paper, the work was supported by a Rutgers Startup Package, a New Jersey Health Foundation grant, a New Jersey Commission on Brain Injury Research grant, and a New Jersey Commission on Spinal Cord Injury Research grant. Three of the authors, Simiao Niu, Fuying Dong, and Chi Han, are inventors on a U.S. provisional patent application related to this work, titled “Wearable Gait Analysis System and Method,” with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, as the current assignee. The authors state they have no other competing interests and that no AI-assisted technologies were used in preparing the manuscript.
Publication Details
Study title: “A biomimetic, ultralow-power edge-AI-empowered and self-sustaining gait analysis system.” Authors: Fuying Dong, Chi Han, Pengchong Xu, Jasleen Chhatwal, Xinnian Jiang, Tengteng Wang, Abigail Hsu, Minzhu Baek, Di Wu, Rui Li, Yuanwen Jiang, Bozhi Tian, Jason Y. Fang, and Simiao Niu, with Niu of Rutgers University as corresponding author. Journal: Science Advances, volume 12, issue 34, article eaeh9625, published August 19, 2026. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aeh9625.







